A Good Riddance? Spin-Offs and the Technological Performance of Parent Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0480

References

  • Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A. M., Sarkar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Zimmer C., Sexton D., Smilor R. Entrepreneurship through social networks. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (1986) (Ballinger, New York) 3–23Google Scholar
  • Amburgey T. L., Kelly D., Barnett W. P. Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(1):51–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P., Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T. Microcomputer manufacturers. Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure and Selection (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 37–58Google Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Rider C. I., Baum J. R., Frese M., Baron R. A. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Revisited. The Psychology of Entrepreneurship (2006) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 113–130Google Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Carroll G. R. Modeling internal organizational change. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1995) 21:217–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., McKendrick D. G. Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(4):535–571Google Scholar
  • Baron J. N. Employing identities in organizational ecology. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(1):3–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron D. N., West E., Hannan M. T. A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York, 1914–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. (1994) 100(1):381–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brittain J. W., Freeman J. H. Entrepreneurship in the Semiconductor Industry. (1986) (Working paper, University of California, Berkeley)Google Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Sørensen J. B., Beckman C. M., Lounsbury M., Vantresca M. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2002) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 229–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R. A stochastic model of organizational mortality: Review and reanalysis. Soc. Sci. Res. (1983) 12(4):303–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T.The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Bigelow L. S., Seidel M-D. L., Tsai L. B. The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(6):117–137Google Scholar
  • Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cooper A. C., Woo C., Dunkelberg W. C. Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms. J. Bus. Venturing (1989) 4(5):317–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Deagon B. Four founding engineers, marketer exit PrairieTek. Electronic News (1990) 36(1827):9Google Scholar
  • Disk/Trend, Inc. Various issues. . Disk/Trend Report. Mountain View, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman J. H. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 33–52Google Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):255–282LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garvin D. A. Spin-offs and the new firm formation process. California Management Rev. (1983) 25(2):3–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P., Lerner J., Scharfstein D. Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):577–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. H. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Burton M. D., Baron J. N. Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high-technology firms. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5(2):503–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R.The Logics of Organizational Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Harmon S.Zero Gravity: Riding Venture Capital from High-Tech Start-Up to Breakout IPO (1999) (Bloomberg Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Higgins M. C., Gulati R. Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S. The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):645–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Sleeper S. Entry by spinoffs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1291–1306LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Thompson P. Spinoff entry in high-tech industries: Motives and consequences. (2005) . Working paper 0503, Florida International University, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster H. Assess your own work and other life lessons. Wall Street J. (1999) December 7Google Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12:1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leow C. Two men and a disk drive. Bus. Times Singapore (1991) November 12):B1Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Organizational adaptation and environmental selection—Interrelated processes of change. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):140–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang K. Y., Zeger S. L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika (1986) 73(1):13–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKendrick D. G., Doner R. F., Haggard S.From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry (2000) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pennings J. The relevance of the structural contingency model of organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20(2):393–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(3):474–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh E., Johnson L., Palmer J.IBM's 360 and Early 370 Systems (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Romanelli E., Cummings L. L., Staw B. Organization birth and population variety: A community perspective on origins. Research in Organizational Behavior (1989) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 211–246Google Scholar
  • Saxenian A.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. A.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1950) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):448–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. (1999) 28(3):289–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. Recruitment-based competition between industries: A community ecology. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(1):149–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):81–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart J. B.Disney War (2005) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Thornton P. The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1999) 25:19–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ton Z., Huckman R. S. Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):56–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel F. C., Cattani G., Pennings J. M. Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(6):691–709LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.