Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies?

References

• Alper S., Tjosvold D., Law K. S. Conflict management, efficacy and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psych. (2000) 53:625–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., Staw B. M. Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:367–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:150–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D.Organizational Learning (1983) (Addison-Wesley, MA) Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:359–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axtell C. M., Holman D. J., Unsworth K. L., Wall T. D., Waterson P. E., Harrington E. Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. (2000) 73:265–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal D. J., Cohen R. R., Burke M. J., McLendon C. L. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:989–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J. Paradox of corporate entrepreneurship. Strategy Bus. (2003) 30:46–58Google Scholar
• Bresman H. External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(1):81–96Link, Google Scholar
• Brodbeck F. C., Kerschreiter R., Mojzisch A., Schulz-Hardt S. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Acad. Management Rev (2007) 32:459–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:875–893Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E., Feinstein J. A., Jarvis W., Blair G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psych. Bull. (1996) 119:197–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron K. S., Quinn R. E., Quinn R. E., Cameron K. S. Organizational paradox and transformation. Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management (1988) (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA) 12–18Google Scholar
• Cardinal L. B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):19–36Link, Google Scholar
• Chatman J., Spataro S. Getting people to cooperate: Understanding relational demography-based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational inducements. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:321–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Polzer J. T., Barsade S. G., Neale M. A. Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:749–780Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg S. R., Cunha J. V., Cunha M. P. Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations (2002) 55:483–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooke R. A., Szumal J. L. The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. (1994) 30:415–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin M. A., Weingart L. R. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management Rev (2007) 32:761–773Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. R. Task versus relationship conflict, team perfomance and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:741–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:612–631Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Nord W. R. Organizing for innovation in the 21st century. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2006) (Sage Publications, London) 598–617Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engle E. M., Lord R. G. Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:988–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford J. D., Ford L. W. Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:756–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frese M., Teng E., Wijnen C. J. D. Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. J. Organ. Behav. (1999) 20:1139–1155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gebert D., Boerner S. The open and the closed corporation as conflicting forms of organization. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. (1999) 35:341–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. J. G. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:10–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn M. A. Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:1081–1111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z.-L., Wong P.-K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:481–494Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E., Joshi A., Erhardt N. L. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Management (2003) 29:801–830Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Groupthink (1982) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:238–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:56–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1183–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:81–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller R. T. Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:167–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller R. T. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:547–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski A. W., Webster D. M. Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psych. Rev. (1996) 103:263–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self management teams. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:385–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1986) (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Leonard D., Swap W.When Sparks Fly: Harnessing the Power of Group Creativity (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lewis M. W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:760–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis M. W., Welsh M. A., Dehler G. E., Green S. G. Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:546–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord R. G., Brown D. J. Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. Leadership Quart. (2001) 12:133–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace K., Shapiro D., Weingart L. R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:779–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E., Goodwin G. F., Heffner T. S., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:273–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miura A., Hida M. Synergy between diversity and similarity in group-idea generation. Small Group Res. (2004) 35:540–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Ringseis E. Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 85:310–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooney A. C., Holahan P. J., Amason A. C. Don't take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44:733–758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H., Chung M. H., Labianca G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:860–875Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):370–386Link, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of group work diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelz D. C., Andrews F. M.Scientists in Organizations (1966) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Peng K., Nisbett R. E. Culture, dialecticism, and reasoning about contradiction. Amer. Psych. (1999) 54:741–754Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A. M., Fenton E. M., Pettigrew A. M., Fenton E. M. Complexities and dualities in innovative forms of organizing. The Innovating Organization (2000) (Sage, London) 279–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. Using paradox to build organization and management theories. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 15:562–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management (2008) 34:375–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517Link, Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. Not so different at all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:393–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein E. H.Organizational Culture and Leadership (1985) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L., Wienk J. A. Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24:779–802Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheremata W. A. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:398–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheremata W. A. Finding and solving problems in software new product developement. J. Product Innovation Management (2002) 19:144–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T. L., Peterson R. S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:102–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:662–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Collins C. J., Clark K. D. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:346–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Sundaramurthy C., Lewis M. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:397–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggar S. Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Acad. Management J (2002) 45:315–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D., De Dreu C. K. W., Van de Vliert E. Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. Using Conflict in Organizations (1997) (Sage Publications, London) 39–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A.Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S. Learning and performance in multi-disciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:532–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D., De Dreu C. K. W., Homan A. C. Work group diversity and performance: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89:1008–1022Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):559–577Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson J. M., Goodman P. S., Cronin M. A. Group learning. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:1041–1059Crossref, Google Scholar