Perspective—Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination

References

• Augier M., March J. G., Sullivan B. N. Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):85–95Link, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Bazerman M. H., Sheppard B. H., Lewicki R. Contextualizing conflict: Notes on the anthropology of disputes and negotiations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations (1991) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 165–199Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Tolbert P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):93–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner T., Buckley W., Burns T. Relational control: The human structure of cooperation and conflict. J. Conflict Resolution (1975) 19(3):417–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M. H., Curhan J. R., Moore D. A., Valley K. L. Negotiations. Annual Rev. Psych. (2000) 51:279–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003a) 109(3):720–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003b) 14(3):312–330Link, Google Scholar
• Biehl M., Kim H., Wade M. Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega (2006) 34:359–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackburn R. S., Michell M. Citation analysis in the organization sciences. J. Appl. Psych. (1981) 66(3):337–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrell G., Morgan G.Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis (1979) (Heinemann, London) Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568Link, Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Flynn F. J. Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):434–447Link, Google Scholar
• Choi J. N., Kim M. U. The organizational application of groupthink and its limitations in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(2):297–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dauphinee D., Martin J. B. Breaking down the walls: Thoughts on the scholarship of integration. Academic Medicine (2000) 75(9):881–886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Marquis C. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):332–343Link, Google Scholar
• Donnellon A., Gray B., Bougon M. G. Communication, meaning and organized action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):43–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Fine G. A. Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annu. Rev. Sociol. (1984) 10:239–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleck L.Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1979) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. The intraorganizational power struggle: Rise of finance personnel to top leadership in large corporations, 1919–1979. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1987) 52(1):44–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Follett M. P.The New State: Group Organization, the Solution of Popular Government (1918) (Longmans Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
• Fox E. M. Mary Parker Follett: The enduring contribution. Public Administration Rev. (1968) 28(6):520–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman R., Poldony J. Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):28–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallagher R., Appenzeller T. Beyond reductionism. Science (1999) 284(5411):79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Gilbert G. N. Referencing as persuasion. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1977) 7:113–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia D., Pitre E. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(4):584–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M. Does geography matter for science-based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):724–741Link, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M., Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):366–382Link, Google Scholar
• Glynn M. A. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(3):285–299Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(1):33–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Cannella A. A. Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(4):733–762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C., Sitkin S. Big-B versus Big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior? J. Organ. Behav. (2001) 22:43–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendriks P. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management (1999) 6(2):91–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):256–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):530–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Cable D. M., Colbert A. E., Rynes S. L. What causes a management article to be cited—article, author or journal? Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(3):491–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1966) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kellogg K. C., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. A. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in post bureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):22–44Link, Google Scholar
• Kieser A., Leiner L. Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. J. Management Stud. (2009) 46(3):516–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K.Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (1999) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A., Rubinstein S. A. Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):367–387Link, Google Scholar
• Kolb D. M., Bartunek J.Hidden Conflict in Organizations: Uncovering Behind-the-Scenes Disputes (1992) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M. Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization process. Res. Organ. Behav. (1991) 13:191–228Google Scholar
• Kray L. J., Galinsky A. D., Thompson L. Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2002) 87(2):386–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) 2nd ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Maines D. R., Charlton J. C. The negotiated order approach to the analysis of social organization. Stud. Symbolic Interaction (1985) 1:271–308Google Scholar
• Martin J. Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(4):339–359Link, Google Scholar
• McNulty S. E., Swann W. B. Identity negotiation in roommate relationships: The self as architect and consequence of social reality. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. (1994) 67(6):1012–1023Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159:56–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan G. Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(4):605–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan G., Smiricich L. The case for qualitative research. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5:491–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrill C. Conflict management, honor, and organizational change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1991) 97(3):585–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrill C.The Executive Way: Conflict Management in Corporations (1995) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Wasserman W.Applied Linear Regression Models (1996) 3rd ed.(Irwin, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J.New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Baumgartner H. Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. J. Econom. Lit. (2002) 40:483–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Baron J. N. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(5):673–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pondy L. Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(2):296–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Rafaeli A., Staw B. M. Symbols as a language of organizational relationships. Res. in Organ. Behavior (2001) (JAI Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 93–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H.The Art and Science of Negotiation (1982) (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. Structuring of organizational structures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raven B. The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. J. Soc. Issues (1993) 49(4):227–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces (1991) 70(2):367–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rynes S. L., Giluk T. L., Brown K. G. The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50:987–1008Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R. An index of subgroup influence in dependency networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(2):194–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt S. M., Kochan T. A. Conflict: Towards conceptual clarity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(3):359–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1992) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Shapiro D. L., Kirkman B. L., Courtney H. G. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(2):249–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele C. M. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual ability and performance. Amer. Psychologist (1997) 52(6):613–629Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A.Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order (1978) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Verniers I., Verhoef P. C. The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. J. Marketing (2007) 71:171–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R. From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):633–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel A. E., Wade-Benzoni K. A., Moag J., Bazerman M. H. The negotiation matching process: Relationships and partner selection. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1999) 80(3):252–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verschuren P. J. M. Holism versus reductionism in modern social science research. Quality & Quantity (2001) 35:389–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton R. E., McKersie R. B.A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System (1965) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Weingart L. R., Hyder E. B., Prietula M. J. Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70(6):1205–1217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J. D., Khanna P. Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in corporate elite. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):361–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• White S. B., Neale M. A. The role of negotiator aspirations and settlement expectancies in bargaining outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1994) 57(2):300–317Google Scholar
• Zhou X. The institutional logic of occupational prestige ranking: Reconceptualization and reanalyses. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111(1):90–140Crossref, Google Scholar