Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search

References

• Allen T. J. Communication networks in R & D laboratories. R&D Management (1970) 1(1):14–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrewes W. J. H., Andrewes W. J. H. Even Newton could be wrong: The story of Harrison's first three sea clocks. The Quest for Longitude: Proc. Longitude Symp. (1996) (Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) 189–234Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) 1(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J.Thinking and Deciding (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ben-David J. Roles and innovations in medicine. Amer. J. Sociol. (1960) 65(6):557–568Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K., Lacetera N., Lakhani K. R. Racing vs. searching in innovation contests: An empirical investigation. (2009) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Che Y. K., Gale I. Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):646–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H.Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2002) (Harvard Business Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Chubin D. E. State of the field: The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociol. Quart. (1976) 17(4):448–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole J. R., Zuckerman H., Maehr M. L., Steinkamp M. W. The productivity puzzle. Advances in Motivation and Achievement (1984) (JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 217–258Google Scholar
• Croson R., Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature (2008) 47(2):448–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ding W. W., Murray F., Stuart T. E. Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science (2006) 313(5787):665–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dogan M., Pahre R.Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersection of Social Sciences (1990) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Dosi G., Levinthal D. A., Marengo L. Bridging contested terrain: Linking incentive-based and learning perspectives on organizational evolution. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):413–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Dunbar K., Bechtel W., Graham G. Problem solving. A Companion to Cognitive Science (1998) (Blackwell, London) 289–298Google Scholar
• Duncker K.On Problem Solving. Psychological Monographs (1945) 58(American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) . No. 5Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H., Kemelgor C., Uzzi B.Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes R., Simon H. A. A study of how individuals solve complex and ill-structured problems. Policy Sci. (1999) 32(3):225–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton R. L., McAfee R. P. Auctioning entry into tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 107(3):573–605Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A., Rivkin J. W. Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(8):691–712Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gieryn T. F., Hirsh H. F. Marginality and innovation in science. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1983) 13(1):87–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gieryn T. F., Hirsh H. F. Marginalia: Reply to Simonton and Handberg. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1984) 14(4):624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C., Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):715–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hamilton B. H., Nickerson J. A. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Stategic Organ. (2003) 1(1):51–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handberg R. Response to Gieryn and Hirsch. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1984) 14(4):622–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B. Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1989) 12(3):305–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L., Page S. E. Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. J. Econom. Theory (2001) 97(1):123–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L., Page S. E. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101(46):16385–16389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J.Crowdsourcing (2008) (Crown Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Jonassen D. H.Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide (2004) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Laursen K., Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(2):131–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J. The development of specialties in science: The case of x-ray protein crystallography. Sci. Stud. (1973) 3(3):275–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Lovett M. C., Anderson J. R. History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psych. (1996) 31(2):168–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luchins A. S.Mechanization in Problem Solving: The Effect of “Einstellung.” Psychological Monographs (1942) 54(American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) . No. 6Google Scholar
• March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–88Link, Google Scholar
• Marengo L., Dosi G., Legrenzi P., Pasquali C. The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9(4):757–788Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLaughlin Optimal marginality: Innovation and orthodoxy in Fromm's revision of psychoanalysis. Sociol. Quart. (2001) 42(2):271–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation (1942) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Rosenberg N.Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth (1989) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullins N. The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva (1972) 10(1):51–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A., Simon H. A.Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem solving perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):617–632Link, Google Scholar
• Niederle M., Vesterlund L. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(3):1067–1101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., von Krogh G. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):635–652Link, Google Scholar
• Page S.The Difference (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall A. G., Andrewes W. J. H. The timekeeper that won the longitude prize. The Quest for Longitude: Proc. Longitude Symp. (1996) (Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) 235–254Google Scholar
• Sheehan K. E-mail survey response rates: A review. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (2001) 6(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.htmlCrossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. The structure of ill structured problems. Artifical Intelligence (1973) 4(3/4):181–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. Is the marginality effect all that marginal? Soc. Stud. Sci. (1984) 14(4):621–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen J. B., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):81–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor C. R. Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(4):872–890Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1529–1543Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven W. P. M. M., Van Praag B. M. S. The demand for deductibles in private health insurance. J. Econometrics (1981) 17(2):229–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Y., Shauman K. A. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63(6):847–870Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman H., Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (1991) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) 27–56Google Scholar