Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership

References

• Abrahamsen M.Cooperative Business Enterprises (1976) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• 199924(2):191–241Acad. Management Rev. (A series of articles and exchanges on stakeholder theory)Google Scholar
• Alchian A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62:777–795Google Scholar
• Aoki M.Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M. Toward an economic model of the Japanese firm. J.Econom. Literature (1990) 28(1):1–27Google Scholar
• Arrow K.The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior (1996) (MacMillan, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard C.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Becker G.Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (1964) (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York:) Google Scholar
• Bennett M.New Roles for Unions in a Team Environment (1988) . Manuscript. Work in America Productivity ForumGoogle Scholar
• Berle A., Means G.Private Property and the Modern Corporation (1932) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Blair M.Ownership and Control (1995) (The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Blasi J. R., Kruse D.The New Owners (1991) (Harper Business, Champaign, IL) Google Scholar
• Bowman E., Useem M., Bowman E., Kogut B. The anomalies of corporate governance. Redesigning the Firm (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 21–48Google Scholar
• Brenner S. N., Cochran P. L., Mahon J. F. The stakeholder model of the firm: Implications for business and society research. Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (1991) Sundance, UT:449–467Google Scholar
• Business and Society The Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. (1994) 33(1):82–131Google Scholar
• (Special issue devoted to stakeholder issues) (1994) 4(1):493–497Business Ethics QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
• Saturn: GM finally has a real winner but success brings a fresh batch of problems Business Week (1992) August 17):86–91Google Scholar
• Calomiris C. W., Ramirez C. D., Kaysen C. Financing the American corporation: The changing menu of financial relationships. The American Corporation Today (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) 128–186Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.The Visible Hand (1977) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Child J. Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6(1):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chinoy E.Automobile Workers and the American Dream (1955) (California Press, Garden City, CA) Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. Trends in team effectiveness research: From the shop floor to the executive suite. (1996) . Unpublished paper. Center for Effective Organizations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the ideas for the new organizational forms? Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(1):I–viGoogle Scholar
• Dertouzos M. R., Lester, Solow R.Made in America (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Donaldson T., Preston L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(1):65–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Zucker L. G. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 3–22Google Scholar
• DiMaggio p., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drucker P.Managing in Turbulent Times (1980) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Stakeholder capitalismThe Economist (1996) August 10):23–25Google Scholar
• Evan W.Organization Theory (1978) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Evan W., Freeman R. E., Beauchamp T., Bowie N. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. Ethical Theory and Business (1988) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 75–93Google Scholar
• Fine C.Clockspeed (1998) (Perseus, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
• Fligstein N.The Transformation of Corporate Control (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fox A.Beyond Contract: Work, Trust, and Authority Relations (1974) (Macmillan, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Pitman, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Freeman R. E., Reed D., Huizinga C. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. Corporate Governance (1983) (University Press, Los Angeles, CA) 89–106Google Scholar
• Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine (1970) September 13Google Scholar
• Frooman J. Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):191–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B., Strauss A.The Discovery of Grounded Theory (1967) (Aldine, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Gould W.Agenda for Reform (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Harbour and AssociatesThe Harbour Report (1995-1999) (Harbour and Associates, Detroit) Google Scholar
• Hart O., Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Economy (1990) 98:1119–1158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L., Jones T. M. Stakeholder-agency theory. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(2):131–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosseni J., Brenner S. The stakeholder theory of the firm: A methodology to generate value matrix weights. Bus. Ethics Quart. (1992) 2(2):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutton W.The State We're In (1995) (Jonathan Cape, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prenushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87:291–313Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:256–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1989) 89:61–74Google Scholar
• Jick T. Mixing quantitative and qualitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:602–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz H. C.Shifting Gears (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kaysen C.The Changing American Corporation (1996) (Oxford, New York) Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A. Using the Dunlop report to achieve mutual gains. Indust. Relations (1995) 34(3):350–366Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A., Katz H. C., McKersie R. B.The Transformation of American Industrial Relations (1986) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A., McKersie R. B., Cappelli P. Strategic choice and industrial relations theory. Indust. Relations (1984) 23:16–39Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A., McKersie R. B., Cappelli P., Chalykoff J. Corporate strategy, workplace innovation, and union members. Indust. and Labor Relations Rev. (1986) 39:487–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochan T. A., Osterman P.The Mutual Gains Enterprise (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Kotter J., Heskett J.Corporate Culture and Performance (1992) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Landers R., Rebitzer J., Taylor L. Rat race redux: Adverse selection in the determination of work hours. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):329–348Google Scholar
• Lawler E.High Involvement Management (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Mason E. S.The Corporation in Modern Society (1959) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J.Economics, Organizations, and Management (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., Wood D. J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):853–886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downsizing of America (1995) (Times Books, New York) . The New York TimesGoogle Scholar
• GM strike: Any winners?The New York Times (1998) July 28):A1Google Scholar
• O'Toole J.Forming the Future (1996) (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Parker M., Slaughter J.Choosing Sides (1988) (South End Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Phahalad C. K. Corporate governance or corporate value added: Rethinking the primacy of shareholder value. Stud. Internat. Corporate Finance and Governance Systems. (1993) May):46–56Google Scholar
• Phillips R. A. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Bus. Ethics Quart. (1997) 7(1):51–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post J. E., Frederick W. C., Lawrence A. T., Weber J.Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, and Ethics (1996) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Power J. D.AssociatesThe Customer Satisfaction Index (1993-1998) (J. D. Power and Associates, Augura Hills, Ca) Google Scholar
• Reich R. The new corporate citizenship. (1996) April 16(U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Roe M. J.Strong Managers, Weak Owners (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Rothschild J.The Cooperative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation (1986) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rousseau D.The Psychological Contract (1995) (Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Rowley T. J. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):887–910Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy D. Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop. Amer. J. Sociology (1952) 55:427–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein S. A. The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of Saturn Corporation. Indust. Labor Rel. Rev. (2000) 53:179–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein S. A., Bennett M., Kochan T., Kaufman B., Kleiner M. The Saturn partnership: Co-management and the reinvention of the local union. Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions (1993) (IRRA Press, Madison, WI) 339–370Google Scholar
• Schmidt S., Kochan T. Conflict: Toward conceptual clarity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:359–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P.TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization (1949) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Selznick P. Institutionalism: ‘Old’ and ‘new’. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:270–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slichter S., Healy J. J., Livernash E. R.The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management (1960) (The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Smith G. D., Dyer D., Kaysen C. The rise and transformation of the American corporation. The Changing American Corporation (1996) (Oxford, New York) 28–73Google Scholar
• Stanford Research Institute Internal memorandum. (1963) Google Scholar
• Stern R. N., Barley S. R. Organizations and social systems: Organization theory's neglected mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:146–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. L., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 142–193Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I. The virtues of closet qualitative science. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:97–102Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Thurow L. C.The Future of Capitalism (1996) (W. Morrow & Co., New York) Google Scholar
• Useem M.Investor Capitalism (1996) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Vanek J.Self-Management: The Economic Liberalism of Man (1975) (Penguin, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Walton R. E., McKersie R. B.A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations (1965) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Webb S., Webb B.The Consumer Cooperative Movement (1930) (Longmans, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Weick K. What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:385–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiler P.Governing the Workplace (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wever K.Negotiating Competitiveness (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Wicks A., Freeman R. E. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organ. Stud. (1998) 9:123–140Google Scholar
• Williamson O.Markets and Hierarchies (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zald M. Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:513–528Link, Google Scholar