The Cost of Status Enhancement: Performance Effects of Individuals' Status Mobility in Task Groups

References

• Abdi H. (2007) Kendall rank correlation. , Salkind N. J., ed. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) , 87–89.Google Scholar
• Ames D. R., Flynn F. J. (2007) What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(2) 307–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C., Kilduff G. J. (2009a) The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(5) 295–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C., Kilduff G. J. (2009b) Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(2) 491–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C., John O. P., Keltner D., Kring A. M. (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1) 116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C., Srivastava S., Beer J., Spataro S., Chatman J. A. (2006) Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6) 1094–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bales R. (1958) Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. , Maccoby E., Newcomb T., Hartley E., eds. Social Psychology, 3rd ed. (Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York) , 437–447.Google Scholar
• Barley S. (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3) 404–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1) 78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3) 720–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker T. E. (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organ. Res. Methods 8(3) 274–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belliveau M. A., Oreilly C. A., Wade J. B. (1996) Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(6) 1568–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Cohen B. P., Zelditch M. J. (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3) 241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Conner T. L., Fisek M. H. (1974) Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program. (Winthrop Publishers, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6 479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Fisek M. H., Norman R. Z. (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 379–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh D. D., Fairbank J. F. (2002) Measuring and testing change in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 23(4) 359–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bienenstock E. J., Bianchi A. J. (2004) Activating performance expectations and status differences through gift exchange: Experimental results. Soc. Psychol. Quart. 67(3) 310–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4) 557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carli L. L., Loeber C. C., Lafleur S. J. (1995) Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(6) 1030–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase I. D. (1980) Social-process and hierarchy formation in small-groups—A comparative perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 45(6) 905–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C. C., Chen X. P., Meindl J. R. (1998) How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Acad. Management J. 23(2) 285–304.Google Scholar
• De Kelaita R., Munroe P. T., Tootell G. (2001) Self-initiated status transfer—A theory of status gain and status loss. Small Group Res. 32(4) 406–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dryer D. C., Horowitz L. M. (1997) When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(3) 592–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden D., Shani A. B. (1982) Pygmalion goes to boot camp: Expectancy, leadership, and trainee performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 67(2) 194–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elangovan A. R., Xie J. L. (1999) Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. J. Organ. Behav. 20(3) 359–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J. (2003) How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. 46(5) 539–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J., Reagans R. E., Amanatullah E. T., Ames D. R. (2006) Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6) 1123–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladstein D. L. (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4) 499–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goar C., Sell J. (2005) Using task definition to modify racial inequality within task groups. Sociol. Quart. 46(3) 525–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C. L., Van Vugt M. (2006) Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(10) 1402–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan R., Hogan J. (1991) Personality and status. , Gilbert D. G., Connolly J. J., eds. Personality, Social Skills and Psychopathology: An Individual Differences Approach. (Plenum Press, New York) , 137–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman B. A., Loch C. H., Onculer A. (2004) Status as a valued resource. Soc. Psychol. Quart. 67(1) 103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 67(2) 219–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Thoresen C. J., Bono J. E., Patton G. K. (2001) The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psych. Bull. 127(3) 376–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkhoff W. (2005) Collective validation in multi-actor task groups: The effects of status differentiation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 68(1) 57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkhoff W., Thye S. R. (2006) Expectation states theory and research—New observations from meta-analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 35(2) 219–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanfer R., Ackerman P. L. (1989) Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J. Appl. Psych. 74(4) 657–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim U., Triandis H. C., Kagitcibasi C., Choi S. G., Yoon G. (1994) Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Application. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
• Lee M. T., Ofshe R. (1981) The impact of behavioral style and status characteristics on social influence: A test of two competing theories. Soc. Psych. Quart. 44(2) 73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester S. W., Meglino B. M., Korsgaard M. A. (2002) The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Acad. Management J. 45(2) 352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N. (1999) Social networks and status attainment. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25 467–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linn R. L., Slinde J. A. (1977) The determination of the significance of change between pre- and posttesting periods. Rev. Ed. Res. 47(1) 121–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Huberman B. A., Stout S. (2000) Status competition and performance in work groups. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(1) 35–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1) 351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markovsky B., Smith L. R. F., Berger J. (1984) Do status interventions persist. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(3) 373–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazur A. (1985) Biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Soc. Forces 64(2) 377–402.Google Scholar
• McClelland D. (1987) Human Motivation. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810) 56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Wasserman W. (1996) Applied Linear Regression Models, 3rd ed. (Irwin, Chicago) .Google Scholar
• Overbeck J. R., Correll J., Park B. (2005) Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. , Thomas-Hunt M. C., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. (Elsevier, Oxford, UK) , 169–199.Google Scholar
• Owens D. A., Sutton R. I. (2001) Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. , Turner M. E., ed. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) , 299–316.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Fong C. T. (2004) The business school “business”: Some lessons from the US experience. J. Management Stud. 41(8) 1501–1520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4) 829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. (2005) Status Signals. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Phillips D. J. (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2) 453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer J., Caruso H. (2008) Identity negotiation processes amidst diversity. , Brief A. P., ed. Diversity at Work. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) , 89–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer J., Milton L. P., Swann W. B. (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2) 296–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath C. L., Overbeck J. R., Pearson C. M. (2008) Picking up the gauntlet: How individuals respond to status challenges. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 38(7) 1945–1980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugh M. D., Wahrman R. (1983) Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups—Do women have to be better than men. Amer. J. Sociol. 88(4) 746–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. (1982) Status in groups—The importance of motivation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(1) 76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. (1991) The social construction of status value—Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2) 367–386.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Berger J. (1986) Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(5) 603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Erickson K. G. (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3) 579–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Walker H. A. (1995) Status structures. , Cook K., Fine G., House J., eds. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. (Allyn & Bacon, Newton, MA) , 281–310.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Diekema D., Johnson C. (1995) Legitimacy, compliance, and gender in peer groups. Soc. Psych. Quart. 58(4) 298–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Boyle E. H., Kuipers K. J., Robinson D. T. (1998) How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 331–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R., Jacobson L. (1968) Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development. (Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York) .Google Scholar
• Rothstein J. A. (2004) College performance predictions and the SAT. J. Econometrics 121(1–2) 297–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slack W., Porter D. (1980) The scholastic aptitude test: A critical appraisal. Harvard Ed. Rev. 50(2) 154–175.Google Scholar
• Strauss A. (1978) Negotiations. (Jossey Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4) 685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thye S. R. (2000) A status value theory of power in exchange relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(3) 407–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens L. Z., Fragale A. R. (2003) Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 84(3) 558–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens L. Z., Unzueta M. M., Young M. J. (2007) An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 93(3) 402–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. L., Foa E. B., Foa U. G. (1971) Interpersonal reinforcers: Classification, interrelationship, and some differential properties. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 19(2) 168–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willer R. (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1) 23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter D. (1973) The Power Motive. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Zelditch M. (2001) Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social. Psych. Quart. 64(1) 4–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou X. (2005) The institutional logic of occupational prestige ranking: Reconceptualization and reanalyses. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1) 90–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziller R. C., Exline R. V. (1958) Some consequences of age heterogeneity in decision-making groups. Sociometry 21(3) 198–211.Crossref, Google Scholar