What Influences How Higher-Status People Respond to Lower-Status Others? Effects of Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Concerns About Status

References

• Adams J. S., Berkowitz L. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) 2(Academic Press, New York) 267–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, London) Google Scholar
• Bagwell L. S., Bernheim B. D. Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):349–373Google Scholar
• Barkow J. Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropol. (1975) 16(4):553–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister R. F., Leary H. M. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. (1995) 117(3):497–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1980) 6:479–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S. L. What leads organization members to collectivize? Injustice and identification as precursors of union certification. Organ. Sci. (2007a) 18(1):108–126Link, Google Scholar
• Blader S. L. What determines people's fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2007b) 43(6):986–994Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S. L., Tyler T. R. A four component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2003) 29(6):747–758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S. L., Tyler T. R., Greenberg J., Colquitt J. A. How can theories of organizational justice explain the impact of fairness? Handbook of Organizational Justice (2005) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 329–354Google Scholar
• Blader S. L., Tyler T. R. Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (2009) 94(2):445–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bono J. E., Anderson M. H. The advice and influence networks of transformational leaders. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90(6):1306–1314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brislin R. W., Triandis H. C., Berry J. W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (1980) (Allyn & Bacon, Boston) 389–444Google Scholar
• Brockner J.Self-Esteem at Work: Research, Theory and Practice (1988) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Brockner J., Wiesenfeld B. M. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psych. Bull. (1996) 120(2):189–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J., Siegel P. A., Daly J., Tyler T. R., Martin C. When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):558–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J., Chen Y.-R., Mannix E. A., Leung K., Skarlicki D. P. Cultural and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):138–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J., Ackerman G., Greenberg J., Gelfand M., Francesco A. M., Chen Z. X., Leung K., et al. Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych (2001) 37(4):300–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D.The Attraction Paradigm (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chen Y.-R., Brockner J., Greenberg J. When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2003) 92(1–2):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C. C., Chen Y.-R., Xin K. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(2):200–209Link, Google Scholar
• Colquitt J. A., Conlon D. E., Wesson M. J., Porter C. O. L. H., Ng K. Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(3):425–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson J. F., Richter A. W. Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(4):917–926Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deaux K. From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(2):105–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Cremer D., Blader S. L. Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2006) 36(2):211–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Cremer D., Tyler T. R. Am I respected or not?: Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Soc. Justice Res (2005) 18(2):121–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Erez M.The Transplanted Executive (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Eden D. Pygmalion, goal setting, and expectancy: Compatible ways to boost productivity. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(4):639–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feather N. T., Zanna M. P. Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1994) 26(Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 1–73Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., Glick P., Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 82(6):878–902Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J., Reagans R. E., Amanatullah E. T., Ames D. R. Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 91(6):1123–1137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folger R., Cropanzano R., Greenberg J., Cropanzano R. Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Advances in Organizational Justice (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 1–55Google Scholar
• Folger R., Rosenfield D. D., Robinson T. Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 45(2):268–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank R.Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status (1985) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Furnham A., Argyle M.The Psychology of Money (1998) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
• Ginzel L., Kramer R., Sutton R. I., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. Research in Organizational Behavior (1992) 15(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 227–266Google Scholar
• Gioia D. A., Chittipeddi K. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(6):433–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey O. J., Consalvi C. Status and conformity to pressure in informal groups. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1960) 60(2):182–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill L. A.Becoming a Manager: Mastery of a New Identity (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (1980) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Hogan R., Hogan J., Gilbert D., Connolly J. Personality and status. Personality, Social Skills, and Psychopathology: An Individual Difference Approach (1991) (Plenum, New York) 137–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans G.The Human Group (1951) (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) Google Scholar
• Humphrey R. How work roles influence perception: Structural-cognitive processes and organizational behavior. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1985) 50(2):242–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackman M. R.The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations (1994) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L., Field P. B., Hovland C. I., Janis I. L. Sex differences and personality factors related to persuasibility. Personality and Persuasibility (1959) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) 55–68Google Scholar
• Jost J. T., Banaji M. R. The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British J. Soc. Psych. (1994) 33(1):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konovsky M. A., Pugh S. D. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(3):656–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 216–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R.Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary M. R., Kelly K. M., Cottrell C. A., Schreindorfer L. S. Individual differences in the need to belong. (2001) . Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NCGoogle Scholar
• Leavitt H. J. Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(March):96–112Google Scholar
• Lenski G. E.Power and Privilege (1966) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Lerner M. J.The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion (1980) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind E. A., Greenberg J., Cropanzano R. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in Organizational Justice (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 56–88Google Scholar
• Major B., Zanna M. P. From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1994) 26(Academic Press, San Diego) 293–355Google Scholar
• Marmot M. G.The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity (2005) (Henry Holt and Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (1968) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mitchell T. R., Mickel A. E. The meaning of money: An individual-difference perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):568–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickett C. L., Gardner W. L., Knowles M. Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2004) 30(9):1095–1107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Szmatka J., Skvoretz J., Berger J. Where do status value beliefs come from? New developments. Status, Network, and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes (1997) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 137–158Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Boyle E. H., Kuipers K. J., Robinson D. T. How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63(3):331–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlenker J. A., Gutek B. A. The effects of role-loss on work-related attitudes. J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 72(2):287–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schroth H. A., Shah P. P. Procedures: Do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(3):462–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sidanius J., Pratto F.Social Dominance Theory: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G., Wolff K. H.The Sociology of Georg Simmel (1950) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., Fong G. T. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2005) 89(6):845–851Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunshine J., Heuer L., Ross M., Miller D. T. Deservingness and perceptions of procedural justice in citizen encounters with the police. The Justice Motive in Everyday Life (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 397–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann W. B.Self-Traps: The Elusive Quest for Higher Self-Esteem (1996) (W. H. Freeman, New York) Google Scholar
• Troyer L., Younts C. W. Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first- and second-order expectations in determining social influence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 103(3):692–732Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L.Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (2000) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Degoey P., Smith H. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matter: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70(5):913–930Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Bos K., Lind E. A., Zanna M. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (2002) 34(Academic Press, San Diego) 1–60Google Scholar
• van Prooijen J. W., van den Bos K., Wilke H. A. M. Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedents of procedural fairness effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 83(6):1353–1361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veblen T.The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (1899) (Dover Publications, Unwin Books). [Reprinted 1905 by Macmillan, New York.]Google Scholar
• Weber M., Roth G., Wittich C.Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (1978) (University of California Press, Berkeley) . [Orig. published 1914.]Google Scholar