The Impact of Categorical Status, Numeric Representation, and Work Group Prestige on Preference for Demographically Similar Others: A Value Threat Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0565

References

  • Alderfer C. (1987) An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. , Lorsch J. W., ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) , 190–222.Google Scholar
  • Allport G. W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Anderson C., Srivastava S., Beer J. S., Spataro S. E., Chatman J. A. (2006) Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6) 1094–1110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Mael F. (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1) 20–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banaji M. R., Bazerman M. H., Chugh D. (2003) How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(12) 56–64.Google Scholar
  • Baumeister R. F. (1982) A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psych. Bull. 91(1) 3–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister R. F., Leary M. (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3) 497–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beauregard K. S., Dunning D. (1998) Turning up the contrast: Self-enhancement motives prompt egocentric contrast effects in social judgments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3) 606–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell M. P., McLaughlin M. E., Sequeira J. M. (2002) Discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling: Women executives as change agents. J. Bus. Ethics 37(1) 65–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Webster M., Ridgeway C., Rosenholtz S. J. (1986) Status cues, expectations, and behavior. , Lawler E. J., ed. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 3. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 1–22.Google Scholar
  • Biernat M., Manis M., Nelson T. E. (1991) Stereotypes and standards of judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 60(4) 485–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B. (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. 86(2) 307–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B. (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5) 475–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B. (1996) When contact is not enough: Social identity and intergroup cooperation. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 20(3–4) 291–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown D. A. (1986) The role of mentoring in the professional lives of university faculty women. Dissertation Abstr. Internat. 47 160A.Google Scholar
  • Budig M. J. (2002) Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Soc. Problems 49(2) 258–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S. (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4) 557–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. (Academic Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Catalyst (2008) 2008 Catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the Fortune 500. . http://www.catalyst.org/file/241/08_census_cote_final.pdf. [Correction available at http://www.catalyst.org/page/234/correction2008-catalyst-census-of-women-corporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fortune-500.]Google Scholar
  • Chatman J. A., Flynn F. J. (2001) The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Management J. 44(5) 956–974.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J. A., O'Reilly C. A. (2004) Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Acad. Management J. 47(2) 193–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J. A., Polzer J. T., Barsade S. G., Neale M. A. (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4) 749–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P. (2003) Can dissimilarity lead to positive outcomes? The influence of open versus closed minds. J. Organ. Behav. 24(3) 295–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P., George E., Shulman A. D. (2008) The asymmetrical influence of sex dissimilarity in distributive vs. colocated work groups. Organ. Sci. 19(4) 581–593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P., Tluchowska M., George E. (2004) Identifying the in-group: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2) 180–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen G. L., Garcia J. (2005) “I am us”: Negative stereotypes as collective threats. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(4) 566–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen L. L., Swim J. K. (1995) The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(9) 876–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen P. N., Hoffman M. L. (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. Amer. Social. Rev. 72(5) 681–704.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conan N. (2009) What have we learned about Sotomayor? By S. Goodwin. Talk of the Nation (broadcast July 9), (National Public Radio, Washington, DC) .Google Scholar
  • Cooley C. H. (1902) Human Nature and the Social Order. (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Correll S. J., Ridgeway C. L. (2003) Expectation states theory. , Delamater J., ed. Handbook of Social Psychology. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York) , 29–51.Google Scholar
  • Correll S. J., Benard S., Paik I. (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5) 1297–1338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker J., McGraw K. M. (1984) What's good for the goose is not good for the gander: Solo status as an obstacle to occupational achievement for males and females. Amer. Behav. Scientist 27(3) 357–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., Wilke H., van Knippenberg A. (1993) Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(5) 766–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., van den Heuvel H., de Gilder D., Maass A., Bonvini A. (2004) The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British J. Soc. Psych. 43(Part 3) 315–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Bhattacharya C. B. (2001) Defining who you are by what you're not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organ. Sci. 12(4) 393–413.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ely R. J. (1994) The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2) 203–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely R. J. (1995) The power in demography: Women's social construction of gender identity at work. Acad. Management J. 38(3) 589–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely R. J., Thomas D. A. (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2) 229–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagenson E. A. (1990) Perceived masculine and feminine attributes examined as a function of individuals sex and level in the organizational power hierarchy—A test of 4 theoretical perspectives. J. Appl. Psych. 75(2) 204–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foschi M. (1996) Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Soc. Psych. Quart. 59(3) 237–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George E., Chattopadhyay P. (2002) Do differences matter? Understanding demography-related effects in organisations. Australian J. Management 27(1 Suppl) 47–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY) .Google Scholar
  • Graves L. M., Powell G. N. (1996) Sex similarity, quality of the employment interview and recruiters' evaluation of actual applicants. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 69(3) 243–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Price K. H., Bell M. P. (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- versus deep-level diversity on work groups. Acad. Management J. 41(1) 96–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman M. E. (1995) Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know. J. Soc. Behav. Personality 10(4) 3–26.Google Scholar
  • Heilman M. E., Block C. J., Lucas J. A. (1992) Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. J. Appl. Psych. 77(4) 536–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman M. E., Block C. J., Stathatos P. (1997) The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Acad. Management J. 40(3) 603–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson-King E. I., Nisbett R. E. (1996) Anti-black prejudice as a function of exposure to the negative behavior of a single black person. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(4) 654–664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinkle S., Brown R. J. (1990) Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. , Abrams D., Hogg M. A., ed. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. (Harvester, New York), 48–70.Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Abrams D. (1988) Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Hains S. C., Mason I. (1998) Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(5) 1248–1263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hultin M., Szulkin R. (1999) Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3) 453–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. (1995) Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3) 673–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson S. E., Stone V. K., Alvarez E. B. (1993) Socialization amidst diversity: The impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers. , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 45–109.Google Scholar
  • Jeanquart-Barone S. (1996) Implications of racial diversity in the supervisor–subordinate relationship. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 26(11) 935–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jetten J., Spears R., Manstead A. S. R. (1997) Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 27(5) 603–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jost J. T. (2001) Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. , Moskowitz G., ed. Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future in Social Cognition. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 89–102.Google Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. (1977a) Men and Women of the Corporation. (Basic Books, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. (1977b) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5) 965–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila S., Meriläinen S. (1999) A serious researcher or just another nice girl?: Doing gender in a male-dominated scientific community. Gender, Work Organ. 6(3) 163–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg K. C. (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3) 657–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. (1991) Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas—The role of categorization processes. , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 191–228.Google Scholar
  • Laws J. L. (1975) The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles 1(1) 51–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus R. S. (1991) Emotion and Adaptation. (Oxford University Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping. (Springer, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Leary M. R., Kowalski R. M. (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psych. Bull. 107(1) 34–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis A. C., Sherman S. J. (2003) Hiring you makes me look bad: Social-identity based reversal of the ingroup favoritism effect. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(2) 262–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loyd D. L., Phillips K. W. (2006) Managing perceptions of ethical behavior in evaluative groups: When trying to do the right thing can lead you to do the wrong thing. , Tenbrunsel A., Mannix E., Neale M. A., eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. (JAI Press, Amsterdam) , 225–245.Google Scholar
  • Loyd D. L., White J. B., Kern M. (2008) Duo status: Disentangling the complex interactions within a minority of two. , Phillips K. W., Mannix E., Neale M. A., eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 11. (JAI Press, Amsterdam) , 75–92.Google Scholar
  • Lyness K. S., Heilman M. E. (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4) 777–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marques J. M. (1990) The black sheep effect: Out-group homogeneity in social comparison settings. , Abrams D., Hogg M. A., eds. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. (Harvester, New York), 131–151.Google Scholar
  • Marques J. M., Paez D. (1994) The black sheep effect: Social categorisation, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. , Stroebe W., Hewstone M., eds. European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 5. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) , 37–68.Google Scholar
  • Marsh H. W., Parker J. W. (1984) Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively big fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(1) 213–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J. (1986) The tolerance of injustice. , Olson J. M., Herman C. P., Zanna M. P., eds. Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 4. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) , 217–242.Google Scholar
  • McDonald T. W., Toussaint L. L., Schweiger J. A. (2004) The influence of social status on token women leaders' expectations about leading male-dominated groups. Sex Roles 50(5–6) 401–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L. (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations—Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3) 370–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mead G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Menon T., Blount S. (2003) The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation. , Kramer R. M., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 137–186.Google Scholar
  • Mussweiler T., Gabriel S., Bodenhausen G. V. (2000) Shifting social identities as a strategy for deflecting threatening social comparisons. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(3) 398–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson D. L., Quick J. C. (1985) Professional women: Are distress and disease inevitable? Acad. Management Rev. 10(2) 206–218.Google Scholar
  • Noel J. G., Wann D. L., Branscombe N. R. (1995) Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity towards out-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(1) 127–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Northcraft G. B., Martin J. (1982) Double jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries. , Gutek B., ed. Sex Role Stereotyping and Affirmative Action Policy. (Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles) , 81–130.Google Scholar
  • Norton M. I., Vandello J. A., Darley J. M. (2004) Casuistry and social category bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(6) 817–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Operario D., Fiske S. T. (2001) Ethnic identity moderates perceptions of prejudice: Judgments of personal versus group discrimination and subtle versus blatant bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(5) 550–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer J. T., Milton L. P., Swann W. B. (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2) 296–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh M. D., Wahrman R. (1983) Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? Amer. J. Sociol. 88(4) 746–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins B. R. (1989) Barriers to mentoring: The female manager's dilemma. Human Relations 42(1) 1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins B. R. (1997) Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: A power perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2) 482–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins B. R. (2008) Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1) 194–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins B. R., Scandura T. A. (1999) Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. J. Organ. Behav. 20(4) 493–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R. (2005) Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data. Management Sci. 51(9) 1374–1383.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. (1988) Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitimacy account. , Webster M., Foschi M., eds. Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) , 188–206.Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4) 627–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Berger J. (1986) Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(5) 603–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Correll S. J. (2004) Unpacking the gender system—A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender Soc. 18(4) 510–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Smith-Lovin L. (1999) The gender system and interaction. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25 191–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Walker H. (1995) Status structures. , Cook K. S., Fine G. A., House J. S., eds. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. (Allyn and Bacon, New York) , 281–310.Google Scholar
  • Roberts L. M. (2005) Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4) 685–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudman L. A., Fairchild K. (2004) Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(2) 157–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sacco J. M., Scheu C. R., Ryan A. M., Schmitt N. (2003) An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 852–865.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salovey P., Rodin J. (1984) Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(4) 780–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salovey P., Rodin J. (1991) Provoking jealousy and envy—Domain relevance and self-esteem threat. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 10(4) 395–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider B. (1987) The people make the place. Personnel Psych. 40(3) 437–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinclair L., Kunda Z. (1999) Reactions to a black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5) 885–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith E. R., Zarate M. A. (1992) Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psych. Rev. 99(1) 3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stangor C., Lynch L., Duan C. M., Glass B. (1992) Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62(2) 207–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele C. M. (1997) Stereotyping and its threat are real. Amer. Psych. 53(6) 680–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele C. M., Aronson J. (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5) 797–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swann W. B., Polzer J. T., Seyle D. C., Ko S. J. (2004) Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1) 9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J. (1986) An integrative theory of social conflict. , Austin W. G., Worchel S., eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago) , 7–24.Google Scholar
  • Taylor S. E., Mettee D. R. (1971) When similarity breeds contempt. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 20(1) 75–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesser A., Millar M., Moore J. (1988) Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(1) 49–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Testa M., Major B. (1990) The impact of social comparisons after failure: The moderating effects of perceived control. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 11(2) 672–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas-Hunt M. C., Gruenfeld D. H. (1998) A foot in two worlds: The participation of demographic boundary spanners in work groups. , Neale M. A., Mannix E. A., Gruenfeld D. H., eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 1. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 39–58.Google Scholar
  • Tice D. M., Wallace H. M. (2003) The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see you. , Leary M. R., Tangney J. P., eds. Handbook of Self and Identity. (Guilford Press, New York) , 91–105.Google Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S., Simons T., Andrews A. O., Rhee J. (1995) The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 48(3) 562–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomaskovic-Devey D., Skaggs S. (2002) Sex segregation, labor process organization, and gender earnings inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(1) 102–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Troyer L., Younts C. W. (1997) Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first- and second-order expectations in determining social influence. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(3) 692–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui A. S., Egan T. D., O'Reilly A. C. (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4) 549–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25. (Academic Press, New York) , 115–191.Google Scholar
  • Williams C. L. (1995) Still a Man's World: Men Who Do Women's Work. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .Google Scholar
  • Williams M. (2007) Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2) 595–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoder J. D. (1991) Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers? Gender Soc. 5(2) 178–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoder J. D. (1994) Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Soc. Psych. Quart. 57(2) 150–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoder J. D., Schleicher T. L., McDonald T. W. (1998) Empowering token women leaders—The importance of organizationally legitimated credibility. Psych. Women Quart. 22(2) 209–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.