Better with Age? Tie Longevity and the Performance Implications of Bridging and Closure

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0566

References

  • Ahuja G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3) 425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G., Polidoro F. , Mitchell W. (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management J. 30 941–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. (Basic Books, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Baldassarri D., Diani M. (2007) The integrative power of civic networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(3) 735–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V., Rowley T. J. (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change 12(4) 697–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., van Liere D., Rowley T. J. (2007) Between closure and holes: Hybrid network positions and firm performance. Presentation, Academy of Management, August, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4) 536–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beatty R. P., Ritter J. R. (1986) Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. J. Financial Econom. 15(1–2) 213–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1980) Autonomy in a social topology. Amer. J. Sociol. 85(4) 892–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action. (Academic Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2000) The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22. (JAI/Elsevier Science, New York) , 345–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2002) Bridge decay. Soc. Networks 24(4) 333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2005) Brokerage and Closure. (Oxford University Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H.-C., Ritter J. R. (2000) The seven percent solution. J. Finance 55(3) 1105–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung S., Singh H., Lee K. (2000) Complementarity status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 21(1) 1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement) S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of the Social Theory. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Mizruchi M. S. (1999) The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the U.S. system of corporate governance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2) 215–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doreian P., Woodard K. L. (1992) Fixed list versus snowball selection of social networks. Soc. Sci. Res. 21(2) 216–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R., Crane D. (1988) Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Ellis K., Michaely R., O'Hara M. (2000) When the underwriter is the market maker: An examination of trading in the IPO aftermarket. J. Finance 55(3) 1039–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Sorenson O. (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7) 1019–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6) 1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H. (2000) Econometric Analysis, 3rd ed. (Macmillan, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1) 85–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439–1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1) 82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B. (2002) Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Res. Organ. Behav. 24 41–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffmann W. H. (2007) Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. 28(8) 827–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K. (1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Jacobson R. (1990) Unobservable effects and business performance. Marketing Sci. 9(1) 74–85.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks' entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3) 466–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge G. G., Griffiths W. E., Hill R. C., Lutkepohl H., Lee T.-C. (1985) The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Kennedy P. (1992) A Guide to Econometrics, 4th ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Khanna T., Gulati R., Nohria N. (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19(3) 193–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kmenta J. (1971) Elements of Econometrics. (Macmillan, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Koka B., Prescott J. (2002) Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management J. 23 795–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1998) Simmelian ties: Super strong and sticky. , Kramer R., Neale M., eds. Power and Influence in Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) , 21–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16 183–210.Google Scholar
  • Larson A. (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1) 76–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. (1988) Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(3) 345–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S. X., Rowley T. J. (2002) Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formations among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. 45(6) 1104–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ljungqvist A. P., Wilhelm W. J. (1999) The seven percent solution? An international perspective on underwriting spreads. . Working paper, Said School of Business, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A. (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20 1133–1156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Megginson W., Weiss K. (1991) Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. J. Finance 46(3) 879–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1) 100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4) 829–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3) 458–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Phillips D. J. (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2) 453–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock T., Porac J., Wade J. (2004) Constructing deal networks: Brokers as network “architects” in the U.S. IPO market and other examples. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1) 50–72.Google Scholar
  • Reagans R. E., McEvily B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effect of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R. E., McEvily B. (2008) Contradictory or compatible? Reconsidering the “trade-off” between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing. , Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., eds. Network Strategy: Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25. (Emerald, Bingley, UK) , 275–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1) 90–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritter J. R. (1991) The long-run performance of initial public offerings. J. Finance 46(1) 3–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J. (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4) 887–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. (2000) Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7) 1113–1126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G. (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated and comp. by , Wolff K. H.. (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) .Google Scholar
  • Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 893–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M., Krackhardt D. (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1) 167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H. (1976) On the nature, formation, and maintenance of relations among organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 1(4) 24–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Walker G. (1984) The dynamics of interorganizational cooperation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4) 598–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ. Sci. 8(2) 109–125.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J. (1999) Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2) 493–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. C. (1970) Chains of Opportunity: System Models of Mobility in Organizations. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Reuer J., Singh H. (2002) Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 13(6) 701–713.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.