Dormant Ties: The Value Of Reconnecting

References

• Abrams L. C., Cross R., Lesser E., Levin D. Z. Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Acad. Management Executive (2003) 17(4):64–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A., Cockburn I., McHale J. Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography (2006) 6(5):571–591Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
• Argyres N. S. The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):162–180Link, Google Scholar
• Baker W. E.Achieving Success Through Social Capital (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bolino M. C., Turnley W. H., Bloodgood J. M. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(4):505–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view on information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models (1992) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Bridge decay. Soc. Networks (2002) 24(4):333–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Brokerage and Closure (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135Link, Google Scholar
• Corredoira R. A., Rosenkopf L. Should auld acquaintance be forgot? The reverse transfer of knowledge through mobility ties. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(2):159–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin M. A., Weingart L. R. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(3):761–773Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462Link, Google Scholar
• Delbridge R., Mariotti F. Creating knowledge and overcoming redundancy in networks: Beyond the strong/weak tie dichotomy. (2007) . Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper 053, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1309583Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H. Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organ. Res. Methods (1998) 1(4):374–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar R. I. M. Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behav. Brain Sci. (1993) 16(4):681–735Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn J. R., Schweitzer M. E. Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2005) 88(5):736–748Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and maintaining a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):345–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambetta D.Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (1988) (Blackwell Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Korine H., Szulanski G. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. (1994) 40(1):96–110Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M., Marsden P. V., Lin N. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Social Structure and Network Analysis (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 105–129Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 25–56Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(4):619–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Mors M. L., Lovas B. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):776–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann D. A. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Management (1997) 23(6):723–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann D. A., Griffin M., Gavin M. B., Klein K., Kozlowski S. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 467–511Google Scholar
• Ilgen D. R., Dass P., McKellin R. A., Lee S. L. Off-task behaviours and outcomes: An exploratory investigation of a neglected domain of organisational behaviour. Appl. Psych.: Internat. Rev. (1995) 44(1):57–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killworth P. D., Johnsen E. C., Bernard H. R., Shelley G. A., McCarty C. Estimating the size of personal networks. Soc. Networks (1990) 12(4):289–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 216–239Google Scholar
• Krull J. L., MacKinnon D. P. Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Rev. (1999) 23(4):418–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G., Brass D. J. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):596–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Whitener E. M., Cross R. Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(5):1163–1171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Kurtzberg T. R., Phillips K. W., Lount R. B. The role of affect in knowledge transfer. Group Dynamics (2010) 14(2):123–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine S. S. The strength of performative ties: Three essays on knowledge, social networks, and exchange. (2005) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Marsden P. V., Scott W. R., Blake J. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology (1990) 16(Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA) 435–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V. The reliability of network density and composition measures. Soc. Networks (1993) 15(4):399–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V., Campbell K. E. Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces (1984) 63(2):482–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattioli D. Ways job seekers can find old contacts. Wall Street Journal (2008) December 16):D5Google Scholar
• McFadyen M. A., Cannella A. A. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):735–746Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(12):1129–1151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtschiem C. J., Wasserman W.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1996) 4th ed.(Irwin, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Nisbett R., Ross L.Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (1980) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H., Labianca G., Chung M.-H. A multilevel model of group social capital. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):569–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A., Wassermann S., Ralston D. A. New frontiers in network theory development. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):560–568Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T. J., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlenker B. R.Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations (1980) (Krieger Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
• Seibert S. E., Kraimer M. L., Liden R. C. A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):219–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sellers R. D. The impact of organization destruction on social capital value. (2006) . Research paper, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. http://weatherhead.case.edu/academics/doctorate/management/research/details.cfm?id=10292&topic=23Google Scholar
• Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):893–906Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Bell N. E., Clausen J. A. The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):56–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson C. Brave new world of digital intimacy. New York Times Magazine (2008) September 7):MM42Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Duijn M. A. J., van Busschbach J. T., Snijders T. A. B. Multilevel analysis of personal networks as dependent variables. Soc. Networks (1999) 21(2):187–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walter J., Lechner C., Kellermanns F. W. Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital. J. Bus. Res. (2007) 60(7):698–710Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J. D., Boivie S., Chng D. H. M. The strategic impetus for social network ties: Reconstituting broken CEO friendship ties. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(5):425–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yli-Renko H., Autio E., Sapienza H. J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6/7):587–613Crossref, Google Scholar