The Organizational Selection of Status Characteristics: Status Evaluations in an Open Source Community

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0580

References

  • Apache Software Foundation (2008) Meritocracy. Glossary of Apache-related terms. . Retrieved September 21, 2010, http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html.Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Fişek M. H. (2006) Diffuse status characteristics and the spread of status value: A formal theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(4) 1038–1079.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Webster M. (2006) Expectations, status, and behavior. , Burke P. J., ed. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) , 268–300.Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Zelditch M. (1998) Introduction to part II: Status processes. , Berger J., Zelditch M., eds. Status, Power and Legitimacy: Strategies and Theories. (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) , 97–119.Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Cohen B. P., Zelditch M. (1966) Status characteristics and expectation states. , Berger J., Zelditch M., Anderson B., eds. Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 1. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) , 26–49.Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Zelditch M. (2002) Construction of status and referential structures. Sociol. Theory 20(2) 157–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6 479–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Wagner D. G., Zelditch M. (1998) A working strategy for constructing theories: State organizing processes. , Berger J., Zelditch M., eds. Status, Power and Legitimacy: Strategies and Theories. (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) , 39–53.Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Fişek M. H., Norman R. Z., Zelditch M. (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. (Elsevier Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Fişek M. H., Norman R. Z. (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 379–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen E. G. (1982) Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Rev. Sociol. 8 209–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen B. P., Zhou X. (1991) Status processes in enduring work groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56(2) 179–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correll S., Ridgeway C. L. (2003) Expectation states theory. , Delamater J., ed. Handbook of Social Psychology. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York) , 29–51.Google Scholar
  • Dubrovsky V., Clapper D., Ullal M. (1996) The effects of a “distinct window” screen design on computer-mediated group decision making. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 4(1) 33–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubrovsky V. J., Kiesler S., Sethna B. N. (1991) The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Comput. Interaction 6(2) 119–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson C. A., Dowd T. J., Ridgeway C. L. (2006) Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32 57–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson C., Fasula A. M., Hysom S. J., Khanna N. (2006) Legitimacy, organizational sex composition, and female leadership. , Thye S. R., Lawler E. J., eds. Social Psychology of the Workplace. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 23. (Elsevier, New York) , 117–147.Google Scholar
  • Kalkhoff W., Thye S. R. (2006) Expectation states theory and research: New observations from meta-analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 35(2) 219–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalkhoff W., Younts C. W., Troyer L. (2008) Facts and artifacts in research: The case of communication medium, gender, and influence. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(3) 1008–1021.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Neter J. (2004) Applied Linear Regression Models, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Lattemann C., Stieglitz S. (2005) Framework for governance in open source communities. Proc. 38th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS-38), Waikoloa, HI, (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) , 192a.Google Scholar
  • Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 52(2) 197–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy S. (1984) Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution. (Doubleday, Garden City, NY) .Google Scholar
  • Linux Counter, The (2008) The Linux Counter. . Accessed September 21, 2010, http://counter.li.org/.Google Scholar
  • Lipnack J., Stamps J. (1997) Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Lofland J., Snow D., Anderson L., Lofland L. H. (2006) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 4th ed. (Wadsworth, Toronto) .Google Scholar
  • Lucas J. W. (2003) Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(3) 464–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mauri R. A. (2004) Unstoppable Linux. Vital Speeches of the Day 70(11) 340–344.Google Scholar
  • McGuire T. W., Kiesler S., Siegel J. (1987) Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(5) 917–930.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moon J. Y., Sproull L. (2002) Essence of distributed work: The case of the Linux kernel. , Hinds P., Kiesler S., eds. Distributed Work. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) , 381–404.Google Scholar
  • Nafus D., Leach J., Krieger B. (2006) Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Policy support—Gender: Integrated report of findings. . FLOSSPOLS Deliverable D16, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  • Open Source Initiative (2008) The open source definition. . Accessed September 21, 2010, http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd.Google Scholar
  • Raymond E. S. (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. (O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rea L. M., Parker R. A. (2005) Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide, 3rd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2) 367–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Balkwell J. W. (1997) Group processes and the diffusion of status-value beliefs. Soc. Psych. Quart. 60(1) 14–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Erickson K. G. (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3) 579–615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Walker H. A. (1995) Status structures. , Cook K. S., Fine G. A., House J. S., eds. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. (Allyn and Bacon, Boston) , 281–310.Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Berger J., Smith L. (1985) Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 90(5) 955–978.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R. (1992) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • Shah S. K. (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7) 1000–1014.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., McGuire T. W. (1986) Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(2) 157–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S. (1986) Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. 32(11) 1492–1512.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart D. (2005) Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(5) 823–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E., von Krogh G. (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2) 209–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner D. G., Berger J. (1993) Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. , Berger J., Zelditch M., eds. Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of a Theory. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) , 23–63.Google Scholar
  • Wagner D. G., Berger J. (2002) Expectation states theory: An evolving research program. , Berger J., Zelditch M., eds. New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. (Rowan and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) , 41–76.Google Scholar
  • Walker H. A., Cohen B. P. (1985) Scope statements: Imperatives for evaluation theory. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50(3) 288–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson A. (2005) Reputation in open source software. . Working paper, Northeastern University, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Webster M. (2006) Status research since 2000. Presentation, Annual Group Processes Conference, August 10, Montreal.Google Scholar
  • Webster M. , Foschi M. (1988) Overview of status generalization. , Webster M., Foschi M., eds. Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) , 1–20.Google Scholar
  • Webster M., Hysom S. J. (1998) Creating status characteristics. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 351–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisband S. (1994) Overcoming social awareness in computer-supported groups: Does anonymity really help? Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 2(4) 285–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisband S. P., Schneider S. K., Connolly T. (1995) Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Acad. Management J. 38(4) 1124–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.