Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0581

References

  • Aguilera R. V., Jackson G. F. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):447–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Missing Data (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Arbuckle J.AMOS 7.0 User's Guide (2006) (AMOS Development Corporation, Mount Pleasant, SC.) Google Scholar
  • Barney J. B., Hansen M. H. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S1):175–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becerra M., Gupta A. K. Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):32–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bigley G. A., Pearce J. L. Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):405–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair M. M.Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century (1995) (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Boersma M. F., Buckley P. J., Ghauri P. N. Trust in international joint venture relationships. J. Bus. Res. (2003) 56(12):1031–1042CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branzei O., Vertinsky I., Camp R. D. Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 104(1):61–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brickson S. L. Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organization's relations with stakeholders. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(4):576–609CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Siegel P. A., Daly J. P., Tyler T. R., Martin C. When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):558–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler J. K. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. J. Management (1991) 17(3):643–663CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman D. W., Carter J. F. Translation procedures for the cross cultural use of measurement instruments. Ed. Eval. Policy Anal. (1979) 1(3):71–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Currall S. C., Inkpen A. C. A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2002) 33(3):479–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currall S. C., Judge T. A. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 64(2):151–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Mayer R. C., Tan H. H. The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(5):563–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dervitsiotis K. N. Beyond stakeholder satisfaction: Aiming for a new frontier of sustainable stakeholder trust. Total Quality Management Bus. Excellence (2003) 14(5):515–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeVellis R. F.Scale Development: Theory and Applications (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Dietz G., Den Hartog D. N. Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Rev. (2006) 35(5):557–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman D. A.Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • DiPiazza S. A., Eccles R. G.Building Public Trust: The Future of Corporate Reporting (2002) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dirks K. T. The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(3):445–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):450–467LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson T., Preston L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(1):65–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doney P. M., Cannon J. P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1997) 61(2):35–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elangovan A. R., Shapiro D. L. Betrayal of trust in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):547–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enz C. A. The role of value congruity in intraorganizational power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33(2):284–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrell O. C. Business ethics and customer stakeholders. Acad. Management Executive (2004) 18(2):126–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrin D. L., Dirks K. T. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):18–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske A. P. Relativity within Moose culture: Four incommensurable models for social relationships. Ethos (1990) 18(2):180–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fombrun C. J.Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (1996) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Pitman, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Friedman A. L., Miles S. Developing stakeholder theory. J. Management Stud. (2002) 39(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Bachman B. A. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common group identity. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations (1996) 20(3–4):271–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ganesan S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1994) 58(2):1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (1991) (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Goodpaster K. E. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Bus. Ethics Quart. (1991) 1(1):53–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gottman J. M., Levenson R. W. Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63(2):221–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Westphal J. D. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(3):473–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R.Trust and Trustworthiness (2002) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hodson R. Organizational trustworthiness: Findings from the population of organizational ethnographies. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):432–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoy W. K., Tschannen-Moran M. Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. J. School Leadership (1999) 9(3):184–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huse M. Researching the dynamics of board-stakeholder relations. Long Range Planning (1998) 31(2):218–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inkpen A. C., Currall S. C. The nature, antecedents, and consequences of joint venture trust. J. Internat. Management (1998) 4(1):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., Leidner D. E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):29–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks' entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):466–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones T. M., Wicks A. C. Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):206–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenning P. Customer trust management—Ein Beitrag zum Vertrauensmanagement im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel. (2001) . Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Münster, Münster, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Kim P. H., Dirks K. T., Cooper C. D., Ferrin D. L. When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 99(1):49–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King N., Symon C. C. G., Cassell C. Template analysis. Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 118–134Google Scholar
  • Kramer R. M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:569–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Whitener E. M., Cross R. Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(5):1163–1171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B., Bunker B. B., Rubin J. Z. Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 133–173Google Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 114–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis J. D., Weigert A. Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces (1985) 63(4):967–985CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luhmann N., Luhmann N. Trust: A mechanism for the reduction of social complexity. Trust and Power (1979) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 4–103Google Scholar
  • Luhmann N.Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus Zur Reduktion Sozialer Komplexität (2000) 4th ed.(Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Lusch R. F., O'Brien M., Sindhav B. The critical role of trust in obtaining retailer support for a supplier's strategic organizational change. J. Retailing (2003) 79(4):249–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macy M. W., Skvoretz J. The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63(5):638–660CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madhavan R., Grover R. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. J. Marketing (1998) 62(4):1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(3):534–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manigart S., Korsgaard A., Folger R., Sapienza H., Bayens K. The impacts of trust on private equity contracts. (2002) . Vlerick Working Papers 2002/1, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Gent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust in management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(1):123–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Gavin M. B. Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):874–888CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):24–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDaniels T. Regression analysis II. (2005) ICPSR Summer Program, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Causes of failure in network organizations. Calif. Management Rev. (1992) 34(4):53–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mishra A. K., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 261–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mishra A. K., Spreitzer G. M. Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):567–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., Wood D. J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):853–887CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(3):20–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nooteboom B. Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organ. Stud. (1996) 17(6):985–1010CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ogden S., Watson R. Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(5):526–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parmigiani A., Mitchell W. How buyers shape supplier performance: Can governance skills substitute for technical expertise in managing out-sourcing relationships? Acad. Management Proc. (2005) C1–C6CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rempel J. K., Holmes J. G., Zanna M. P. Trust in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 49(1):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rempel J. K., Ross M., Holmes J. G. Trust and communicated attributions in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(1):57–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. L. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):574–599CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross W., Lacroix J. Multiple meanings of trust in negotiation theory and research: A literature review and integrative model. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1996) 7(4):314–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotter J. B. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Amer. Psych. (1971) 26(5):443–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):393–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):887–910CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schein E. H.Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View (1985) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Schneper W. D., Guillén M. F. Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(2):263–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoorman F. D., Mayer R. C., Davis J. H. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(2):344–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott S. G., Lane V. R. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):43–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar V., Urban G. L., Sultan F. Online trust: A stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2002) 11(3–4):325–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro D., Sheppard B., Cheraskin L. Business on a handshake. Negotiation J. (1992) 8(4):365–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw R. B.Trust in the Balance: Building Successful Organizations on Results, Integrity and Concern (1997) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Sheppard B. H., Sherman D. A. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):422–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shockley-Zalabak P., Morley D. D. Creating a culture: A longitudinal examination of the influence of management and employee values on communication rule stability and emergence. Human Comm. Res. (1994) 20(3):334–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shockley-Zalabak P., Ellis K., Cesaria R. Measuring organizational trust—Trust and distrust across cultures—The organizational trust index. (1999) . Report, IABC Research Foundation, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Roth N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(3):367–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer G. M., Mishra A. K. Giving up control without losing control: Trust and its substitutes' effects on managers' involving employees decision making. Group Organ. Management (1999) 24(2):155–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swift T. Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Bus. Ethics: A Eur. Rev. (2001) 10(1):16–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J., Austin W., Worchel S. An integrative theory of social contact. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1979) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) 33–47Google Scholar
  • Tan H.-T., Libby R. Tacit managerial versus technical knowledge as determinants of audit expertise in the field. J. Accounting Res. (1997) 35(1):97–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlinson E. C., Mayer R. C. The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(1):85–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tschannen-Moran M. Collaboration and the need for trust. J. Ed. Admin. (2000) 39(4):308–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tschannen-Moran M., Hoy W. K. A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust. Rev. Ed. Res. (2000) 70(4):547–593CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turnbull S.A New Way to Govern: Organizations and Society After Enron (2002) (New Economics Foundation, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler T. R.Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (2000) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warner J. B., Watts R. L., Wruck K. H. Stock prices and top management changes. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20(January–March):461–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber J. M., Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Res. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26:75–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitener E. M., Brodt S. E., Korsgaard M. A., Werner J. M. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):513–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wicks A. C., Berman S. L., Jones T. M. The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):99–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams M. In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Acad. Management J. (2001) 28(3):377–396Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econom. (1993) 36(1, Part 2):453–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woolsey L. K. The critical incident technique: An innovative qualitative method of research. Canadian J. Counselling (1986) 20(4):242–254Google Scholar
  • Yaniv E., Farkas F. The impact of person-organization fit on the corporate brand perception of employees and of customers. J. Change Management (2005) 5(4):447–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):141–159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zey M.Rational Choice Theory and Organizaiton Theory: A Critique (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.