The Coevolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety

References

• Baer M., Frese M. (2003) Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24(1) 45–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin T. T., Bedell M. D., Johnson J. L. (1997) The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. 40(6) 1369–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P., Harrison D. A. (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about the effects of network structure on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(1) 49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Foster P. C. (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management 29(6) 991–1013.Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4) 518–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Burkhardt M. E. (1993) Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3) 441–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. P., Leigh T. W. (1996) A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 81(4) 358–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. (Academic Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Casciaro T., Lobo M. S. (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4) 655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R. B., Kallgren C. A., Reno R. R. (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. , Zanna M. P., ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24. (Academic Press, San Diego) , 202–235.Google Scholar
• Collins N. L., Miller L. C. (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3) 457–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contractor N. S., Wasserman S., Faust K. (2006) Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3) 681–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J. A. (1970) Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 35(5) 843–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean J. W., Brass W. D. J. (1985) Social interaction and the perception of job characteristics in an organization. Human Relations 38(6) 571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert J. R., Burris E. R. (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Management J. 50(4) 869–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewhirst H. D. (1971) Influence of perceived information-sharing norms on communication channel utilization. Acad. Management J. 14(3) 305–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. (1996) Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behav. Psych. 32(1) 5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2) 350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Mogelof J. P. (2005) Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: Organizational culture, team dynamics, or personality? , Thompson L., Choi H., eds. Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 109–136.Google Scholar
• Fehr B. (2004) Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(2) 265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2) 117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E. (1991) Social Cognition. (McGraw Hill Education, New York) .Google Scholar
• Floyd K. (2006) Communicating Affection: Interpersonal Behavior and Social Context. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons D. E. (2004) Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2) 238–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg L. R. (1992) The development of markers for the big five factor structure. Psych. Assessment 4(1) 26–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gully S. M. (2000) Work teams research. , Beyerlein M. M., ed. Work Teams: Past, Present, and Future. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) , 25–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huston T. L., Levinger G. (1978) Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Rev. Psych. 29 115–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Andrews S. B. (1993) Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2) 277–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn W. A. (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4) 692–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley H. H. (1973) The processes of causal attribution. Amer. Psychologist 28(2) 107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M., Crossland C., Tsai W., Krackhardt D. (2008) Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1) 15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Lim B.-C., Saltz J. L., Mayer D. M. (2004) How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 952–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J., Ilgen D. R. (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3) 77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J., Klein K. J. (2000) A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. , Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J., eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) , 3–90.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. (1990) Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2) 342–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. , Nohria N., Eccles R. G., eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) , 215–239.Google Scholar
• Labianca G., Brass D. J. (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3) 596–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G., Brass D. J., Gray B. (1998) Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Acad. Management J. 41(1) 55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N. (1982) Social resources and instrumental action., Marsden P. V., Lin N., eds. Social Structure and Network Analysis. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) , 131–145.Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R., Miller J. (1979) Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2) 181–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks M. A., Mathieu J. E., Zaccaro S. J. (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3) 356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J., Maynard M. T., Rapp T., Gilson L. (2008) Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Management 34(3) 410–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• May D. R., Gilson R. L., Harter L. M. (2004) The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 77(1) 11–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L. (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3) 370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1) 415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. J. (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1) 121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S. (2003) Theories of Communications Networks. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L. (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messick D. M., eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nebus J. (2006) Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3) 615–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7) 941–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neubert M. J., Taggar S. (2004) Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. Leadership Quart. 15(2) 175–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor J.-C., Meindl J. R., Mayo M. C. (2002) A network effects model of charisma attributions. Acad. Management J. 45(2) 410–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S. (1999) Collective information processing in groups. , Frey L. R., Gouran D. S., Poole M. S., eds. The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) , 235–250.Google Scholar
• Pronin E. (2007) Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(1) 37–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reeder G. D., Pryor J. B., Wohl M. J., Griswell M. L. (2005) On attributing negative motives to others who disagree with our opinions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 31(11) 1498–1510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ripley R., Snijders T. A. B. (2009) Manual for SIENA Version 4.0. (Department of Statistics, Nufield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
• Sahlins M. D. (2003) Stone Age Economics. (Routledge, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2) 224–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sears D. O. (1986) College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(3) 515–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah P. P. (1998) Who are employees' social referents? Using a network perspective to determine referent others. Acad. Management J. 41(3) 249–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B. (2005) Models for longitudinal network data. , Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S., eds. Models in Social Network Analysis. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) , 215–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B., Baerveldt C. (2003) A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on network evolution. J. Math. Sociol. 27(2–3) 123–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B., Steglich C., Schweinberger M. (2007) Modelling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. , van Montfort K., Oud J., Satorra A., eds. Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 41–72.Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B., van de Bunt G. G., Steglich C. E. G. (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc. Networks 32(1) 44–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steglich C., Snijders T. A. B., West P. (2006) Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology 2(1) 48–56.Google Scholar
• Tucker A. L., Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. (2007) Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Sci. 53(6) 894–907.Link, Google Scholar
• Umphress E. E., Labianca G., Brass D. J., Kass E., Scholten L. (2003) The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees' perceptions of organizational justice. Organ. Sci. 14(6) 738–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Vroom V. (1995) Work and Motivation. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Wellman B., Wong R., Tindall D., Nazer N. (1997) A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and and stability in personal communities. Soc. Networks 19(1) 27–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zohar D., Tenne-Gazit O. (2008) Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 93(4) 744–757.Crossref, Google Scholar