Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices

References

• Abell P., Felin T., Foss N. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial Decision Econom. (2008) 29(6):489–502Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Allen T. J., Cohen S. I. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14(1):12–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M. Horizontal vs. vertical information structures of the firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):971–983Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) 1(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banbury C. M., Mitchell W. The effect of introducing important incremental innovation on market share and business survival. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(S1):161–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):267–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R., Griffiths R., Reenen J. V. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(3):529–554Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bock G.-W., Zmud R. W., Kim Y.-G., Lee J.-N. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):87–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T. F., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. Information assets, technology and organization. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1645–1662Link, Google Scholar
• Burnkrant R. E., Page T. J. An examination of the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of Fishbein's behavioral intention model. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(4):550–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design (1998) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Fiske D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. (1959) 56(2):81–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capelli P., Neumark D. Do “high-performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes? Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2001) 54(4):737–775Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cefis E., Marsili O. A matter of life and death: Innovation and firm survival. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(6):1167–1192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H.Open Innovation (2003) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Child J., McGrath R. G. Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1135–1148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo M. G., Delmastro M. The determinants of organizational change and structural inertia: Technological and organizational factors. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2002) 11(4):595–635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki D., Kraft K. Innovation indicators and corporate credit ratings: Evidence from German firms. Econom. Lett. (2004) 82(3):377–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(3):555–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta D. K., Guthrie J. P., Wright P. M. Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(1):135–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E.Intrinsic Motivation (1975) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desouza K. C., Awazu Y., Jha S., Dombrowski C., Papagari S., Baloh P., Kim J. Y. Customer-driven innovation: To be a marketplace leader, let your customers drive. Res.-Tech. Management (2008) 51(3):35–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1511Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):612–631Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Hardy C. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1120–1153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):345–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ennen E., Richter A. The whole is more than the sum of its parts: Or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organization. J. Management (2010) 36(1):207–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fey C. F., Birkinshaw J. External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. J. Management (2005) 31(4):597–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher T. D., Germano L. M., Selgrade K. A. On the use of partial covariances in structural equation modeling. (2006) Paper, Twenty-first Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational PsychologyDallas http://www.umsl.edu/∼fletchert/papers/partialcov.pdfCrossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss N. J. Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon spaghetti organization. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):331–349Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman C. Chemical process plant: Innovation and the world market. National Inst. Econom. Rev. (1968) 45(August):29–51Google Scholar
• Gagné M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26(4):331–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces (1974) 4(3):28–36Link, Google Scholar
• Gardiner J. P., Rothwell R. Tough customers: Good designs. Design Stud. (1985) 6(1):7–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gassmann O. Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R&D Management (2006) 36(3):223–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerbing D. W., Anderson J. C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(2):186–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski P., Machin S., van Reenen J. The profitability of innovating firms. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):198–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinstein A. The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: A meta-analysis. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2008) 36(2):166–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guthrie J. P. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):180–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haefliger S., von Krogh G., Spaeth S. Code reuse in open source software. Management Sci. (2008) 54(1):180–193Link, Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (1995) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Barro R., Mason G., O'Mahony M. Innovation and market value. Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 177–198Google Scholar
• Hamilton B. H., Nickerson J. A., Owan H. Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. (2003) 111(3):465–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han J. K., Kim N., Srivastava R. K. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? J. Marketing (1998) 62(4):30–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S1):63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J., von Hippel E. Welfare implications of user innovation. J. Tech. Transfer (2005) 30(1–2):73–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B., Roberts J. The boundaries of the firm revisited. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 12(4):73–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurley R. F., Hult G. T. M. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J. Marketing (1998) 62(3):42–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huselid M. A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):635–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K. The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U.S. and Japanese plants. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):704–721Link, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
• Jaccard J. J., Wan C. K.LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):999–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H., Werin L., Wijkander H. Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Contract Economics (1992) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 251–274Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K.-G., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modelling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (1993) (Scientific Software International, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Laudon K. C., Laudon J. P.Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (2002) 7th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Laursen K., Foss N. New human resource management practices, complementarities, and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge J. Econom. (2003) 27(2):243–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K., Salter A. J. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(2):131–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E. I., Mohrman S. A., Ledford G. E.Strategies for High Performance Organizations: Employee Involvement, TQM, and Reengineering Programs in Fortune 1000 Corporations (1998) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D., Sinha D. K. Developer-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(5):1125–1139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler U. Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2008) 55(1):148–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G. L., Morrison P. D., Searls K., Sonnack M., von Hippel E. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1042–1059Link, Google Scholar
• Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linder S. B.An Essay on Trade and Transformation (1961) (Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm) Google Scholar
• Love J. H., Roper S. Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams. Technovation (2009) 29(3):192–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lukas B. A., Ferrell O. C. The effect of market orientation on product innovation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28(2):239–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynex A., Layzell P. J. Organisational considerations for software reuse. Ann. Software Engrg. (1998) 5:105–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matusik S., Choo C. W., Bontis N. Managing public and private firm knowledge within the context of flexible firm boundaries. Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 605–620Google Scholar
• McEvily S. K., Chakravarthy B. The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(4):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):513–529Link, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Pillai R. R. Information age organizations, dynamics, and performance. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1999) 38(3):253–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narver J. C., Slater S. F. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narver J. C., Slater S. F., MacLachlan D. L. Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. J. Product Innovation Management (2004) 21(5):334–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neale M. R., Corkindale D. R. Co-developing products: Involving customers earlier and more deeply. Long Range Planning (1998) 31(3):418–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):617–632Link, Google Scholar
• Osterloh M., Frey B. S. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational form. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(3):538–550Link, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Policy (1984) 13(6):343–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter L. W., Lawler E. E.Managerial Attitudes and Performance (1968) (Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Roberts J.The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (2007) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. Learning by using. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 120–140Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local research: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothwell R., Freeman C., Jervis P., Robertson A., Townsend J. SAPPHO updated—Project SAPPHO phase II. Res. Policy (1974) 3(3):258–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(3):427–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle (1934) (Oxford University Press, London) . [Originally published in 1912 as Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig, Germany.]Google Scholar
• Slater S. F., Narver J. C. Does competitive environment moderate market orientation-performance relationship? J. Marketing (1994) 58(1):46–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter special issue):27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J.Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):996–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Nadler D. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):613–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Katz R. External communication and project performance—An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. (1980) 26(11):1071–1085Link, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L., von Hippel E. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):569–582Link, Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W., Foss N. J., Lyles M. A. Absorbing the notion of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(4):931–951Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. The dominant role of users in scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy (1976) 5(3):212–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):791–805Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T. R., Hesterly W. S. The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives and molecular units. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):209–222Link, Google Scholar
• Zott C. Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):97–125Crossref, Google Scholar