Including the “I” in Virtuality and Modern Job Design: Extending the Job Characteristics Model to Include the Moderating Effect of Individual Experiences of Electronic Dependence and Copresence

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Altman I., Taylor D. A.Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships (1973) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
• Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 167–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997) (W. H. Freeman & Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (1980) (Anchor Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregations and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 349–381Google Scholar
• Brdiczka O., Su N. M., Begole J. Using temporal (T-patterns) to relieve stress factors of routine tasks. Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conf. Human Factors (CHI'09) (2009) (ACM, New York) 4081–4086Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):875–897Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chudoba K. M., Wynn E., Lu M., Watson-Manheim M. B. How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Inform. Systems J. (2005) 15(4):279–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J., Staw B. M., Kramer R. M. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior (2004) 26(Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 231–263Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Orvis K. L., Wilson J. M. Situation invisibility and attribution in distributed collaborations. J. Management (2007) 33(4):525–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan M. J., Markus M. L., Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L., Roberts K. H., Porter L. W. Information technologies. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1987) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 420-443Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psych. Inquiry (2000) 11(4):227–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(2):239–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards H. K., Sridhar V. Analysis of software requirements engineering exercises in a global virtual team setup. J. Global Inform. Management (2005) 13(2):21–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fielding N. G., Lee R. M.Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Fried Y., Ferris G. R. The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. (1987) 40(2):287–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J., Schmitz J., Steinfield C. W., Fulk J., Steinfield C. W. A social influence model of technology use. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 117–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Cohen S. G., Gibson C. B., Cohen S. G. The last word: Conclusions and implications. Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (2003) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 403–421Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Gibbs J. L. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2006) 51(3):451–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Vermeulen F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):202–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Zellmer-Bruhn M. Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(2):274–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E.Behavior in Public Places (1963) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Sawyer J. E., Neale M. A. Virtualness and knowledge: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):265–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinter R. E., Herbsleb J. D., Perry D. E. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in RD work. Proc. Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work (1999) Phoenix, AZ:14–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman R., Lorsch J. W. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Katz N., Fiske S. T., Gilbert D. T., Lindzey G. Group behavior and performance. Handbook of Social Psychology (2010) 5th ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 1208–1251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Lawler E. E. Employee reactions to job characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. (1971) 55(3):259–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psych. (1975) 60(2):159–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1976) 16(2):250–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R.Work Redesign (1980) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):290–307Link, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Comm. Res. (1996a) 23(2):193–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996b) 68(3):181–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B., McGrath J. E., Guzzo R. A., Salas E. Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 46–78Google Scholar
• Huang W. W., Wei K.-K., Watson R. T., Tan B. C. Y. Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems (2002) 34(4):359–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey S. E., Nahrgang J. D., Morgeson F. P. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(5):1332–1356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Johns G., Xie J. L., Fang Y. Q. Mediating and moderating effects in job design. J. Management (1992) 18(4):657–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kabanoff B. Computers can read as well as count: Computer-aided text analysis in organizational research—Introduction. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18(S1):507–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96(1):56–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J. N., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Rosen B., Tesluk P. E., Gibson C. B. Enhancing the transfer of computer assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(3):706–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Rosen B., Gibson C. B., Tesluk P. E., McPherson S. O. Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc.. Acad. Management Executive (2002) 16(3):67–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein J., Kleinhanns A., Gibson C. B., Cohen S. G. Closing the time gap in virtual teams. Virtual Teams That Work: Creating the Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (2003) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 381–400Google Scholar
• Knobloch L. K., Carpenter-Theune K. E. Topic avoidance in developing romantic relationships. Comm. Res. (2004) 31(2):173–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fish R. S., Root R. W., Chalfonte B. L., Baecker R. M. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human-Human Collaboration (1993) (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA) 287–314Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fussell S. R., Brennan S. E., Siegel J., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(4):645–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E., Mohrman S. A., Ledford G. E.Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management (1992) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Lea M., Spears R. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1992) 2(3–4):321–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K. M. Presence, explicated. Comm. Theory (2004) 14(1):27–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis R. B. NVivo 2.0 and ATLAS.ti 5.0: A comparative review of two popular qualitative data-analysis programs. Field Methods (2004) 16(4):439–466Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loher B. T., Noe R. A., Moeller N. L., Fitzgerald M. P. A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70(2):280–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D., Wajcman J.The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum (1985) (Open University Press, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
• Marrone J. A., Tesluk P. E., Carson J. B. A multi-level investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary spanning behavior. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(6):1423–1439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins L. L., Gilson L. L., Maynard M. T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30(6):805–835Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping L. M., Agarwal R. Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(6):975–990Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492Link, Google Scholar
• McCracken G.The Long Interview (1988) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Mohrman S. A., Jackson S. E., Hitt M. A., Denisi A. S. Designing work for knowledge-based competition. Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage (2003) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 94–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohrman S. A., Gibson C. B., Mohrman A. M. Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):357–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocker R., Hiltz S., Turoff M., Fjermestad J. The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams: Results on creativity and quality. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(3):127–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham G. R., Hackman J. R. Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. J. Organ. Behav. (2010) 31(2–3):463–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Leary M. B., Cummings J. N. The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. (2007) 31:433–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker S. K., Wall T. D., Anderson N., Ones D. S., Sinangil H. K., Viswesvaran C. Work design: Learning from the past and mapping a new terrain. Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology (2001) 1(Sage, London) 90–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker S. K., Wall T. D., Cordery J. L. Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. (2001) 74(4):413–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee Y. Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potter R. E., Balthazard P. S. Understanding human interaction and performance in the virtual team. J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl. (2002) 4(1). Article 6Google Scholar
• Renn R. W., Vandenberg R. J. The critical psychological states: An underrepresented component in job characteristics model research. J. Management (1995) 21(2):279–303Google Scholar
• Roberts C. W.Text Analysis for the Social Sciences (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Roberts K. H., Glick W. The job characteristics approach to task design—A critical review. J. Appl. Psych. (1981) 66(2):193–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psychologist (2000) 55(1):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson C. A., Karetsky K. H. Intimacy goals and strategies of conflict resolution in dating relationships: A meditational analysis. J. Soc. Personal Relationships (2002) 19(3):317–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt J. B., Montoya-Weiss M. M., Massey A. P. New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(4):575–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert S. E., Silver S. R., Randolph W. A. Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(3):332–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short J., Williams E., Christie B.The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, London) Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G. M. Psychological empowerment in the workplace—Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(5):1442–1465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1492–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Stanko T. L., Gibson C. B., Bhagat R. S., Steers R. M. Virtuality here and now: The role of cultural elements in virtual teams. Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organization, and Work (2009) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 272–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su N. M., Mark G. Communication chains and multitasking. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2008) (ACM, New York) 83–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan B. C. Y., Wei K.-K., Huang W. W., Ng G.-N. A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2000) 43(2):153–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor D., Altman I., Roloff M. E., Miller G. R. Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research (1987) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 257–277Google Scholar
• Tesluk P. E., Mathieu J. E. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(2):200–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas K. W., Velthouse B. A. Cognitive elements of empowerment—An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(4):666–681Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):186–203Link, Google Scholar
• Warkentin M. E., Sayeed L., Hightower R. Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a Web-based conference system. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(4):975–996Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. J. Management (2001) 27(2):213–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson J. M., O'Leary M. B., Metiu A., Jett Q. R. Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organ. Stud. (2008) 29(7):979–1002Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfe R. A., Gephart R. P., Johnson T. E. Computer-facilitated qualitative data analysis: Potential contributions to management research. J. Management (1993) 19(3):637–660Google Scholar
• Zdaniuk B., Levine J. M. Group loyalty: Impact of members' identification and contributions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2001) 37(6):502–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao S. Toward a taxonomy of copresence. Presence (2003) 12(5):445–455Crossref, Google Scholar