The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0592

References

  • Ahuja G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3) 425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bae J., Gargiulo M. (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 843–859.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. E. (1984) The social structure of a national securities market. Amer. J. Sociol. 89(4) 775–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W., Faulkner R. R. (2009) Social capital, double embeddedness, and mechanisms of stability and change. Amer. Behav. Scientist 52(11) 1531–1555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A.-L., Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439) 509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6) 1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Cowan R., Jonard N. (2010) Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Management Sci. 56(11) 2094–2110.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V., Rowley T. J. (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change 12(4) 697–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4) 536–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belsey D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R. E. (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1977) A macrosociological theory of social structure. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1) 26–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J. (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4) 518–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F. (1999) New modes of competition: Implications for the future structure of the computer industry. , Eisenach J. A., Lenard T. M., eds. Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) , 155–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F. (2000) Competition, co-operation and predation in innovative industries. Fighting Cartels—Why and How? 3RD Nordic Competition Policy Conf., . Konkurrensverket (Swedish Competition Authority), Stockholm, 116–144.Google Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Greenstein S. (1999) Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. J. Indust. Econom. 47(1) 1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2) 349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. (Oxford University Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T. (2003) Determinants of governance structures in alliances: The role of strategic, task, and partner uncertainties. Indust. Corporate Change 12(6) 1223–1251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H. W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Clauset A., Shalizi C. R., Newman M. E. J. (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51(4) 661–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Cowan R., Jonard N. (2009) Knowledge portfolios and the organization of innovation networks. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2) 320–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowan R., Jonard N., Zimmermann J.-B. (2007) Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Management Sci. 53(7) 1051–1067.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Datamonitor (2006) Internet-based business: Bubble trouble. (February 7).Google Scholar
  • Davis J. A. (1967) Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 20(2) 181–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Greve H. R. (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1) 1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Yoo M., Baker W. E. (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. 1(3) 301–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dedrick J., Kraemer K. L. (2005) The impacts of IT on firm and industry structure: The personal computer industry. Calif. Management Rev. 47(3) 122–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doreian P., Stokman F. N. (1997) The dynamics and evolution of social networks. , Doreian P., Stokman F. N., eds. Evolution of Social Networks. (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam) , 1–17.Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1) 84–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbyaer M., Mische A. (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4) 962–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez R. M., Fernandez-Mateo I. (2006) Networks, race, and hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(1) 42–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J., Bielefeld W., Dowell M. (2006) Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3) 337–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Jain S., Kumaraswamy A. (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. 45(1) 196–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gell-Mann M. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. (W. H. Freeman, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .Google Scholar
  • Girvan M., Newman M. E. J. (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(12) 7821–7826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomes-Casseres B. (1996) The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1982) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisted. , Marsden P. V., Lin N., eds. Social Structure and Network Analysis. (Sage Publications, London) , 105–131.Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greif A. (1993) Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(3) 99–118.Google Scholar
  • Grove A. S. (1996) Only the Paranoid Survive. (HarperCollins Business, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Guimerà R., Amaral L. A. N. (2005) Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433(7028) 895–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guimerà R., Sales-Pardo M., Amaral L. A. N. (2004) Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 70(2, Part 2) 025101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4) 619–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4) 293–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1999) Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 20(5) 397–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. (2007) Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations, and Other Relational Assets. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439–1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M. (2007) Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on exchange performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1) 32–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J., Cloodt M., Roijakkers N. (2006) Trends and patterns in interfirm R&D networks in the global computer industry: An analysis of major developments, 1970–1999. Bus. History Rev. 80(4) 725–746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenerg M. (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Beckman C. M. (1998) When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4) 815–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hilbe J. M. (2007) Negative Binomial Regression. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson M. O., Rogers B. W. (2007) Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks? Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3) 890–915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson S. C. (1967) Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32(3) 241–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karinthy F. (1929) Chains: Everything Is Different. (Atheneum Press, Budapest) .Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Walker G. (2001) The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(3) 317–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossinets G. (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc. Networks 28(3) 247–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson A. (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1) 76–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4) 797–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazer D., Friedman A. (2007) The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2) 667–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S. X., Rowley T. J. (2002) Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. 45(6) 1104–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N. (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madhavan R., Koka B. R., Prescott J. E. (1998) Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management J. 19(5) 439–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malerba F., Orsenigo L. (1996) The dynamics and evolution of industries. Indust. Corporate Change 5(1) 51–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V., Friedkin N. E. (1993) Network studies of social influence. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1) 127–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A. (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12) 1133–1156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1) 415–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgram S. (1967) The small world problem. Psych. Today 2 60–67.Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S. (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S., Stearns L. B., Marquis C. (2006) The conditional nature of embeddedness: A study of borrowing by large U.S. firms, 1973–1994. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(2) 310–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(2) 404–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. (2002) Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(20) 208701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. (2003) Properties of highly clustered networks. Phys. Rev. E 68(2, Part 2) 026121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. (2004) Detecting community structure in networks. Eur. Physical J. B 38(2) 321–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J., Girvan M. (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Rev. E 69(2) 026113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. (2004) Knowledge networks in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1) 5–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ozcan P., Eisenhardt K. M. (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network srategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2) 246–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perkins A. B., Perkins M. C. (2001) The Internet bubble: The Inside Story on Why It Burst—And What You Can Do to Profit Now. (HarperBusiness, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Phillips D. J., Zuckerman E. W. (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2) 379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pimentel B. (2003) Dell says some tech firms doomed. San Francisco Chronicle (September 9) B1.Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1) 33–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac J. F., Thomas H., Wilson F., Paton D., Kanfer A. (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2) 203–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1) 116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., White D. R., Koput K. W., Owen-Smith J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4) 1132–1205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richtel M. (2000) Signs of market saturation in PC world. New York Times (October 8) C8.Google Scholar
  • Riolli-Staltzman L., Luthans F. (2001) After the bubble burst: How small high-tech firms can keep in front of the wave. Acad. Management Executive 15(3) 114–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Padula G. (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5) 669–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Schilling M. A. (2007) Comparing alliance network structure across industries: Observations and explanations. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(3–4) 191–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Tushman M. L. (1998) The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Indust. Corporate Change 7(2) 311–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Metiu A., George V. P. (2001) From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4) 748–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roussos G. (2005) Ubiquitous and Pervasive Computing: New Frontiers for Electronic Business, Computer Communications and Networks. (Springer, Berlin) .Google Scholar
  • Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. (2000) Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. (2009) Understanding alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3) 233–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7) 1113–1126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell W. H. (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1) 1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon C. E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27(July–October) 379–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V., Li S. X. (2008) To have a cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1) 73–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V., Li S. X. (2012) The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 472–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6) 1546–1586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3) 668–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8) 791–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Spiro J. (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2) 447–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waldrop M. M. (1992) Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. (Simon & Schuster, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Wang L., Zajac E. J. (2007) Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management J. 28(13) 1291–1317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J. (1999) Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2) 493–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684) 440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4) 817–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. C. (1981) Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3) 517–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Bell G. G. (2005) Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. 26(9) 809–825.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Soda G. (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1) 1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Hernandez E., Banerjee S. (2010) Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organ. Sci. 21(5) 1072–1091.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.