The Prince and the Pauper: Search and Brokerage in the Initiation of Status-Heterophilous Ties

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0594

References

  • Baum J. A. C., Dahlin K. B. Aspiration performance and railroads' patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):368–385LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V., Rowley T. J. Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):697–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(4):536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(3):563–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Power and centrality: The family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(5):1170–1183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S., Everett M., Freeman L. C.UCINet 5 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buskens V., van de Rijt A. Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. Amer. J. Sociol. (2008) 114(2):371–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castellucci F., Ertug G. What's in it for them: Advantages of higher status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. (2010) 53(1):149–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W.-R., Miller K. D. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D research intensity. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(4):369–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung S. A., Singh H., Lee K. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corwin S. A., Schultz P. The role of IPO underwriting syndicates: Pricing, information production, and underwriter competition. J. Finance (2005) 60(1):443–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Greve H. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 103(1):1–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., Crane D. B.Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work (1988) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Benassi M. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):183–196LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. V., Fernandez R. M. Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodol. (1989) 19:89–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Sticky aspirations: Organizational time perspective and competitiveness. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(1):1–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(3):476–494CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guimerà R., Amaral L. A. N. Cartography of complex networks: Modules and universal roles. J. Statist. Mech. (2005) 2005(P02001):1–13Google Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M., Tatarinovycz A. The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure. Organ. Sci. (2010) . ePub ahead of print December 29, doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0592Google Scholar
  • Haleblian J., Kim J.-Y. J., Rajagopalan N. The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(2):357–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks' entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):466–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry: When do social status and structural holes work against you? Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(4):723–743CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King G., Zeng L. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. (2001) 9(2):137-163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. (1999) 16(1):183–210Google Scholar
  • Li S. X., Rowley T. J. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1104–1120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mezias S. J., Chen Y., Murphy P. Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1285–1301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mitsuhashi H., Greve H. R. A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(5):975–995CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E (2004) 69(6, Part 2):066133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(1):33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Phillips D. J. The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5(2):453–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E., Hannan M. T. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. (1996) 102(3):659–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock T., Porac J., Wade J. Constructing deal networks: Brokers as network “architects” in the U.S. IPO market and other examples. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(1):50–72Google Scholar
  • Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social dimensions of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(6):1320–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., White D., Koput K., Owen-Smith J. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 110(4):1132–1205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raftery A. E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol. Methodol. (1995) 25:111–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J., Baum J. A. C. Sophistication of interfirm network strategies in the Canadian investment banking industry. Scand. J. Management (2004) 20(1–2):103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J., Greve H. R., Rao H., Baum J. A., Shipilov A. V. Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(3):499–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V. Should you bank on your network? Relational and positional embeddedness in the making of financial capital. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3(3):279–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V. Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(3):590–604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V., Li S. X. Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2008) 53(1):73–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. V. Performance slack and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(3):562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B., Greve H., Chen W. Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(3):696–712LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):109–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Bell G. G. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes and performance. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(9):809–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.