Text Me! New Consumer Practices and Change in Organizational Fields

References

• Ahonen T.Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2009—Mobile Telecoms Industry Review (2009) (TomiAhonen Consulting). http://www.tomiahonen.comGoogle Scholar
• Ansari S., Garud R. Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications. Res. Policy (2009) 38(2):382–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S., Munir K. How valuable is a piece of the spectrum? Determination of value in external resource acquisition. Indust. Corporate Change (2008) 17(2):301–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M.Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker S., Clifford M. Tale of a bubble: How the 3G fiasco came close to wrecking Europe. Bus. Week (2002) June 3). http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_22/b3785010.htmGoogle Scholar
• Barley S. R., Tolbert P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):93–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron S., Patterson A., Harris K. Beyond technology acceptance: Understanding consumer practice. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management (2006) 17(2):111–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson R. The joy of text. Guardian (2000) June 3). http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article-1720309.eceGoogle Scholar
• Bijker W., Law J.Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (1997) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Brief A. P., Bazerman M. Editor's comments: Bringing in consumers. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):187–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carphone Warehouse The mobile life report 2006: How mobile phones change the way we live. (2006) . London School of Economics and Political Science/Carphone Warehouse, http://www.mobilelife2006.co.ukGoogle Scholar
• Centre for Economics and Business Research The changing economic impact of mobile phones. (2004) . Report, mmO2, Berkshire, UKGoogle Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Crabtree J., Nathan M., Roberts S. Mobile UK: Mobile phones and everyday life. (2003) . Report, The Work Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Dacin M. T., Goldstein J., Scott W. R. Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):43–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Marquis C. Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):332–343Link, Google Scholar
• Delbridge R., Edwards T. Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during non isomorphic institutional change. Human Relations (2008) 61(3):299–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S.Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Zucker L. G. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 3–22Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorado S. Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(3):385–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The Mobile phones: Battling for the palm of your hand. (2004) April 29). http://www.economist.com/node/2628495Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M. The dialectics of institutional development in emerging and turbulent fields: Pricing conventions in the online database industry. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):848–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkner P., Runde J. On the identity of technical objects and user innovations in function. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(3):442–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortunati L. The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Inform., Comm. Soc. (2002) 5(4):513–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox K. Evolution, alienation and gossip: The role of mobile telecommunications in the 21st century. (2001) . Report, Social Issues Research Centre, London. http://www.sirc.org/publik/gossip.shtmlGoogle Scholar
• Friedland R., Alford R. R., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 232–263Google Scholar
• Galvin T. L., Ventresca M. J., Hudson B. A. Contested industry dynamics. New directions in the study of legitimacy. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. (2005) 34(4):56–82Google Scholar
• Gartner Gartner's top predictions for IT organizations and users 2007 and beyond. (2006) . Report, Gartner, Stamford, CTGoogle Scholar
• Garud R., Hardy C., Maguire S. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(7):1101–1122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giussani B.Roam: Making Sense of the Wireless Internet (2001) (Random House, London) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research (1967) (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London) Google Scholar
• Goggin G., Spurgeon C. Premium rate culture: The new business of mobile interactivity. New Media Soc. (2007) 9(5):753–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopinath S. Ringtones, or the auditory logic of globalization. First Monday (2005) 10(12):1–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S. Rhetorical theory of diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(4):653–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Suddaby R. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):27–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haig M.Mobile Marketing: The Message Revolution (2002) (Kogan Page, London) Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. B., Douglas Y. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):476–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargrave T. J., Van de Ven A. H. A collective action model of institutional innovation. Acad. Management Rev (2006) 31(4):864–888Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harkins J. Mobilization: The growing public interest in mobile technology. (2003) . Report, Demos, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Hensmans M. Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organ. Stud. (2003) 24(3):355–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchby I.Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union (2009) . Corporate Annual Report 2009. ITU, GenevaGoogle Scholar
• Katz J. E., Aakhus M. A. Introduction: Framing the issues. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
• Kaufman J., Patterson O. Cross-national cultural diffusion: The global spread of cricket. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(1):82–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopomaa T.The City in Your Pocket: Birth of the Mobile Information Society (2000) (Gaudeamus, Helsinki) Google Scholar
• Kvale S.InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Lacohée H., Wakeford N., Pearson I. A social history of the mobile telephone with a view of its future. BT Tech. J. (2003) 21(3):203–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampel J., Meyer A., Ventresca M. Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42(5):1099–1100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence T. B., Phillips N. From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization (2004) 11(5):689–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R., Clegg S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Nord W. R. Institutions and institutional work. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2006) (Sage, London) 215–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence T. B., Hardy C., Phillips N. Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):281–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H., Salancik G. R., Copay A., King T. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):333–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G.Naturalistic Inquiry (1985) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K. D.Grounded Theory in Management Research (2001) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M., Crumley E. T. New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(7):993–1012Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S., Hardy C., Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Oliver C., Sahlin Andersson K. Institutional entrepreneurship. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 198–217Google Scholar
• Marshall P. D.New Media Cultures (2004) (Edward Arnold, London) Google Scholar
• Menon N., Page M., Watt M., Bell S. Mobinet 2005: An A. T. Kearney/University of Cambridge Study. (2005) . Survey, A. T. Kearney, London; and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
• Meyer A. D. Adapting to environmental jolts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(4):515–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Mobile Data Association Latest statistics. (2009) . Press release (March 4). Retrieved August 13, 2009, http://www.themda.org/Google Scholar
• Munir K. A., Phillips N. The birth of the “Kodak moment”: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(11):1665–1687Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munir K., Jones M., Orlikowski W., Runde J., Nikolychuk L. From photos to pixels. Micro-institutional dynamics in institutional change. (2007) Presentation, Academy of Management ConferenceAugust 2–7PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Office of Communications The communications market. (2009) . Report, Office of Communications, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q.Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (2002) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A. M. Longitudinal research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(3):267–292Link, Google Scholar
• Plant S. On the mobile: The effect of mobile telephones on social and individual life. (2000) . Retrieved September 10, 2005, http://www.motorola.com/Google Scholar
• Priem R. L. A consumer perspective on value creation. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(1):219–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H.Market Rebels: How Activists Make or Break Radical Innovations (2009) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Rao H., Monin P., Durand R. Institutional change in Tocque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003) 108(4):795–843Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Morrill C., Zald M. N. Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav. (2000) 22:237–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T., Hinings C. R. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ. Stud. (2009) 30(6):629–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rheingold H.Smart Mobs. The Next Social Revolution (2002) (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.The Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sanders W. G., Tuschke A. The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):33–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin A. The role of mobile phones in increasing accessibility and efficiency in healthcare. (2006) . Vodafone Policy Paper 4 (March 24), Vodafone, Newbury, UKGoogle Scholar
• Sauder M. Interlopers and field change: The entry of U.S. news into the field of legal education. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2008) 53(2):209–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schatzki T. R., Knorr Cetina K., von Savigny E.The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (2001) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing and network externalities. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(2):387–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M. Combining new institutionalisms: Explaining institutional change in American property insurance. Sociol. Forum (2005) 20(1):93–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Seo M., Creed W. E. D. Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management J. (2002) 27(2):222–247Google Scholar
• Stern B. B. A revised communication model for advertising: Multiple dimensions of the source, the message and the recipient. J. Advertising (1994) 23(2):5–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D., Meyer J. W. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc. (1993) 22(4):487–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman M. C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):571–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A. Culture and action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1986) 51(2):273–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A. S., Harper R. The gift of the gab? A design oriented sociology of young people's use of mobiles. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2003) 12(3):267–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A. S., Vincent J., Hamil L., Lasen A. An SMS history. Mobile World: Past, Present and Future (2005) (Springer, New York) 75–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Polley D. E., Garud R., Venkataraman S.The Innovation Journey (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):409–421Link, Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Applications of Case Study Research (1993) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Zeitz G., Mittal V., McAulay B. Distinguishing adoption and entrenchment of management practices: A framework for analysis. Organ. Stud. (1999) 20(5):741–776Crossref, Google Scholar