Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0596

References

  • Abernathy W. J.The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry (1978) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baltagi B. H., Wu P. X. Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory (1999) 15(6):814–823CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Greve H. R., Park D. Y. An evolutionary model of organizational performance. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S1):11–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bascle G. Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. (2008) 6(3):285–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(4):536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):259–275LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R., Griffith R., Van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econom. J. (1995) 105(429):333–344Google Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brush T. H., Bromiley P., Hendrickx M. The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):455–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Staw B. M., Sutton R. I. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) 22(Elsevier, New York) 345–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., Zhang H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):781–796LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Chung S. A., Singh H., Lee K. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor F. J., Kundu S. K., Hsu C.-C. A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2003) 34(1):5–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) 2nd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Duncan R. B.The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation (1976) (North Holland, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. H.Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):209–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M., Baden-Fuller C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J. Management Stud. (2004) 41(1):61–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995a) 38(1):85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995b) 40(4):619–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(4):293–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(5):397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Higgins M. C. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):127–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Singh H. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(4):781–814CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):693–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(5):371–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton B. H., Nickerson J. A. Correction for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1(1):51–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82(5):929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J. A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46(6):1251–1271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He Z.-L., Wong P.-K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):481–494LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoang H., Rothaermel F. T. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(2):332–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffmann W. H. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(8):827–856CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen J. J. P., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1661–1674LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen R., Szulanski G. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2004) 35(6):508–523CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Dyer J. H., Singh H. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):747–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Singh H., Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):217–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalmbach C., Roussel C. Dispelling the myths of alliances. Outlook Spec. Edition (1999) October):5–32Google Scholar
  • Kleinbaum D. G., Kupper L. L., Muller K. E., Nizam A.Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods (1998) 3rd ed.(Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):255–264LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. Managing partnerships and strategic alliances: Raising the odds of success. Eur. Management J. (2000) 18(2):146–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):638–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(12):1187–1212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D., Miller S. R. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):623–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):797–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C., Lee K., Pennings J. M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):615–640CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(S2):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S. X., Rowley T. J. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1104–1119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z., Yang H., Demirkan I. The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1645–1658LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lubatkin M., Shrieves R. E. Towards reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(3):497–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala G. S.Introduction to Econometrics (2001) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter special issue):77–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan M. P. Managerial incentives for short-term results. J. Finance (1985) 40(5):1469–1484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Silverman B. S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):433–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(4):74–81Google Scholar
  • Park S. H., Chen R., Gallagher S. Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market growth and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(3):527–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S., Birkinshaw J., Probst G., Tushman M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):685–695LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reuer J. J., Ariño A. Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(3):313–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):687–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T., Deeds D. L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(3):201–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):369–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudy J. Standard and Poor's industry surveys—Computers: Software. (2000) (McGraw Hill, New York) 1–38Google Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Steensma K. H. Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):387–401LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sidhu J. S., Commandeur H. R., Volberda H. W. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):20–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stock J. H., Wright J. H., Yogo M. A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2002) 20(4):518–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(8):719–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tobin J. Estimation for relationships with limited dependent variables. Econometrica (1958) 26(1):24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P., O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: Organizational renewal through innovation streams and strategic change. Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings (1997) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 3–23Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vassolo R. S., Anand J., Folta T. B. Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: A real options-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(11):1045–1061CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–713LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.