Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities

References

• Ahuja M. K., Galletta D. F., Carley K. M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):21–38Link, Google Scholar
• Arguello J., Butler B., Joyce E., Kraut R., Ling K. S., Wang X. Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2006) Montréal(ACM, New York) 959–968Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási A.-L.Linked: The New Science of Networks (2002) (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Barabási A.-L. Network theory—The emergence of the creative enterprise. Science (2005) 308(5736):639–641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási A.-L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., McKelvey B., Ketchen D. J., Bergh D. D. Analysis of extremes in management studies. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (2006) 3(JAI Press, Oxford, UK) 123–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearman P. Generalized exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 102(5):1383–1415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P.NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software (2002) (Manual, Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KY) Google Scholar
• Box G. E. P., Jenkins G. M.Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1976) (Holden-Day, Oakland, CA) Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–819Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):198–213Link, Google Scholar
• Burke P. J. An identity model for network exchange. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(February):134–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler B. S. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362Link, Google Scholar
• Calhoun C., Gerteis J., Moody J., Pfaff S., Virk I.Contemporary Sociological Theory (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1973) 33(1):107–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135Link, Google Scholar
• Contractor N. S., Wasserman S., Faust K. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):681–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook K. S., Rice E., Delamater J. Social exchange theory. Handbook of Social Psychology (2006) (Springer, New York) 53–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook K. S., Rice E. R. W., Turner J. H. Exchange and power: Issues of structure and agency. Handbook of Sociological Theory (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York) 699–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462Link, Google Scholar
• Crouch B., Wasserman S. A practical guide to fitting p* social network models. Connections (1998) 21:87–101Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Monge P. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):693–703Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Ekeh P. P.Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Emerson R. M., Berger J., Zelditch M., Anderson B. Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks. Sociological Theories in Progress (1972) 2(Houghton-Mifflin, Boston) 58–87Google Scholar
• Feldman D. C. The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(1):47–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher D., Smith M., Welser H. T. You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups. Proc. 39th Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (2006) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagin A. J. Commercial markets as communication markets: Uncertainty reduction through mediated information exchange in online auctions. New Media Soc. (2007) 9(3):401–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Waguespack D. M. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):165–180Link, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J. Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(4):737–750Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J., Heino R., Flanagin A. J., Monge P. R., Bar F. A test of the individual action model for organizational information commons. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):569–585Link, Google Scholar
• Heinz M., Rice R. E., Beck C. S. An integrated model of knowledge sharing in contemporary communication environments. Communication Yearbook (2009) 33(Routledge, London) 135–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesselbein F., Goldsmith M., Beckhard R., Schubert R. F.The Drucker Foundation: The Community of the Future (1998) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Hiltz S. R., Turoff M.The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Kiesler S.Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Frederiksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):45–63Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson S. L., Faraj S. Preferential attachment and mutuality in electronic knowledge networks. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2005) Las Vegas, NV(Association for Information Systems, Atlanta) 287–299Google Scholar
• Jones Q., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):194–210Link, Google Scholar
• Joyce E., Kraut R. E. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2006) 11(3). Article 3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadushin C. Networks and small groups. Structure Dynam.: eJournal Anthropol. Related Sci. (2005) 1(1). Article 5Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai P., Yoo Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):783–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K.-K. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):113–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz J. E., Rice R. E.Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M., Tsai W., Hanke R. A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of organizational social network research program. Acad. Management J. (2006) 31(4):1031–1048Google Scholar
• Kuk G. Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1031–1042Link, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):569–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markovsky B., Willer D., Patton T. Power relations in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1988) 53(2):220–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mashima R., Takahashi N., Biel A., Eek D., Gärling T., Gustafsson M. The emergence of generalized exchange by indirect reciprocity. New Issues and Paradigms in Research on Social Dilemmas (2008) (Springer, New York) 159–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm L. D., Collett J. L., Schaefer D. R. Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 113(1):205–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. (2003) 45(2):167–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J., Barabási A. L., Watts D. J.The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (2006) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Yates J., Okamura K., Fujimoto M. Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):423–444Link, Google Scholar
• Peddibhotla N. B., Subramani M. R. Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(3):327–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedhazur E. J., Schmelkin L. P.Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach (1991) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJ) Google Scholar
• Porter C. E. A typology of virtual communities: A multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2004) 10(1). Article 3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Comm. Res. (2000) 26(3):341–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece J.Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Preece J., Nonnecke B., Andrews D. The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Comput. Human Behav. (2004) 20(2):201–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam R. D.Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (2000) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafaeli S., Sudweeks F., Sudweeks F., McLaughlin M., Rafaeli S. Interactivity on the Nets. Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 173–189Google Scholar
• Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Asynchronous discussion groups as small world and scale free networks. First Monday (2004) 9(9). http://131.193.153.231/www/issues/issue9_9/ravid/index.htmlCrossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y., Kraut R., Kiesler S. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(3):377–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rheingold H.The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (1993) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Rice R. E., Burgoon M. Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. Communication Yearbook (1982) 6(Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 925–944Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice R. E., Aydin C. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):219–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards W. D., Seary A. J. MultiNet for Windows 4.55. (2004) . User's manual, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Ridings C. M., Gefen D. Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2004) 10(1). Article 4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins G., Pattison P., Kalish Y., Lusher D. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Networks (2007) 29(2):173–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seary A. J., Richards W. D. Fitting to p* models in MultiNet. Connections (2000) 23(1):84–101Google Scholar
• Shah S. K. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1000–1014Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H. R.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Bidgoli H. Online communities. The Internet Encyclopedia (2004) 2(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 733–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sudweeks F., McLaughlin M., Rafaeli S.Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Takahashi N. The emergence of generalized exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 105(4):1105–1134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaast E. What goes online comes offline: Knowledge management system use in a soft bureaucracy. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(3):283–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Lee C.-H. Preferential linkage and network evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):876–892Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• Wagner C. S., Leydesdorff L. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res. Policy (2005) 34(10):1608–1618Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker H. A., Thye S. R., Simpson B., Lovaglia M. J., Willer D., Markovsky B. Network exchange theory: Recent developments and new directions. Soc. Psych. Quart. (2000) 63(4):324–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace P. M.The Psychology of the Internet (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M. M., Faraj S. “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2000) 9(2–3):155–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M. M., Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):35–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Pattison P. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika (1996) 61(3):401–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(2):493–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. The new science of networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2004) 30:243–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B., Gulia M., Wellman B. Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities (1999) (Westview, Boulder, CO) 331–366Google Scholar
• Willer D.Network Exchange Theory (1999) (Praeger, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T., Cook K. S. Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1993) 56(4):235–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T., Gillmore M. R., Cook K. S. Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 93(4):833–851Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J., Orlikowski W. J., Okamura K. Explicit and implicit structuring of genres in electronic communication: Reinforcement and change of social interaction. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):83–103Link, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. F., Griffith T. L., Majchrzak A., Dougherty D. J., Faraj S. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):1–14Link, Google Scholar