European and North American Approaches to Organizations and Strategy Research: An Atlantic Divide? Not.

References

• Augier M., March J. G., Sullivan B. N. Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):85–95Link, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Observations on CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):61–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Baum J. A. C., McKelvey B. Whole-part coevolutionary competition in organizations. Variations in Organizations: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell (1999) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 113–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C.Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C. Cultural group selection in organization studies. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(1):37–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Baum J. A. C.Companion to Organizations: An introduction (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 1–34Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H., Pieters R. The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. J. Marketing (2003) 67(2):123–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.A Realist Theory of Science (1978) (Harvester Press, Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.Reclaiming Reality (1989) (Verso, London) Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. The genesis of the concepts of habitus and field. Sociocriticism (1985) 2(2):11–24Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Vive la crise! For heterodoxy in social science. Theory Soc. (1988) 17(5):773–787Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyacigiller N. A., Adler N. J. The parochial dinosaur: The organizational sciences in a global context. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(2):262–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B. In-group bias in the minimal group situation: A cognitive–motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86(2):307–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrell G., Morgan G.Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life (1979) (Heinemann, London) Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. How individual and face-to-face group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 23–38Google Scholar
• Carter C., Clegg S. R., Kornberger M. M. Strategy as practice? Strategic Organ. (2008) 6(1):83–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Nord W. Introduction: Organizations, organization and organizing. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, London) 1–28Google Scholar
• Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Nord W.Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):177–183Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J., March J. G. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):523–538Link, Google Scholar
• Foucault M.The Archaeology of Knowledge (1972) (Pantheon Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (1979) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory (1982) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Grey C. Organizing studies: Publications, politics and polemic. Organ. Stud. (2010) 31(6):677–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacking I.Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hickson D. J. The ASQ years then and now through the eyes of a Euro-Brit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(2):217–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings C. R. Defining organization theory: A British view from North America. Organ. Stud. (1988) 9(1):2–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings C. R. Thirty years of Organization Studies: Enduring themes in a changing institutional field. Organ. Stud. (2010) 31(6):659–675Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. An American in Paris: The influence of nationality on organization theories. Organ. Stud. (1996) 17(3):525–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P., Kaplan S., Baum J. A. C., Lampel J. Taking “strategy-as-practice” across the Atlantic. The Globalization of Strategy Research: Advances in Strategic Management (2010) 27(Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK) 51–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P., Whittington R. Hard to disagree, mostly: A comment on Carter, Clegg and Kornberger. Strategic Organ. (2008) 6(1):101–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kassem M. S., Hofstede G., Kassem M. S. Introduction: European versus American organization theories. European Contributions to Organization Theory (1976) (Van Gorcum, Amsterdam) 1–17Google Scholar
• Koza M. P., Thoenig J.-C. Organizational theory at the crossroads: Some reflections on European and United States approaches to organizational research. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):1–8Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Lakatos I., Musgrave A.Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (1970) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lammers C. J. Sociology of organizations around the globe: Similarities and differences between American, British, French, German and Dutch brands. Organ. Stud. (1990) 11(2):179–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeVine R. A., Campbell D. T.Ethnocentricism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behavior (1972) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. L., Haas M., Lee B., Zhang N. Book review: The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):318–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G.Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago) Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(2):278–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management Organ. Rev. (2004) 1(1):5–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. The study of organizations and organizing since 1945. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(1):9–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden R., Townley B., Clegg S. R., Hardy C. The owl of Minerva: Reflections on theory in practice. Studying Organization: Theory and Method (1999) (Sage, London) 405–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCann L. Book review: The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Work Employment Soc. (2007) 21(1):167–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer R. E., Boxenbaum E. Exploring European-ness in organization research. Organ. Stud. (2010) 31(6):737–755Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu M. C., Baum J. A. C., Baum J. A. C. Contemporary debates in organizational epistemology. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 733–751Google Scholar
• Olson N., Perkins S. J., Mantere S., Üsdiken B., Wexler M. Special book review. Organ. Stud. (2004) 25(4):489–500Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A. M.The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries (1985) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(4):599–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popper K. R.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1999) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Powell T. C. Fallibilism and organizational research: The third epistemology. J. Management Res. (2001) 1(4):201–219Google Scholar
• Putnam H.Reason, Truth and History (1981) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quine W. O., Foster L., Swanson J. W. Grades of theoreticity. Experience and Theory (1970) (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst) 1–17Google Scholar
• Ranson S., Hinings B., Greenwood R. The structuring of organizational structures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spicer A. Opening the Companion. Ephemera (2004) 4(1):7–20Google Scholar
• Symon G., Buehring A., Johnson P., Cassell C. Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labor process. Organ. Stud. (2008) 29(10):1315–1336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Amer. (1970) 223:96–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H., Knudsen C.The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Theory: Meta-Theoretical Perspectives (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Üsdiken B. Between contending perspectives and logics: Organizational studies in Europe. Organ. Stud. (2010) 31(6):715–735Crossref, Google Scholar
• Üsdiken B., Pasadeos Y. Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of co-citation networks. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16(3):503–526Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J. Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(6):687–692Link, Google Scholar
• Westwood R., Clegg S. R., Westwood R., Clegg S. The discourse of organization studies: Dissensus, politics, and paradigms. Debating Organization: Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 1–42Google Scholar
• Whitley R. The development of management studies as a fragmented adhocracy. Soc. Sci. Inform. (1984a) 23(4–5):125–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley R. The fragmented state of management studies: Reasons and consequences. J. Management Stud. (1984b) 21(3):331–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington R.Corporate Strategies in Recession and Recovery: Social Structures and Strategic Choice (1989) (Unwin Hyman, London) Google Scholar
• Whittington R. Putting Giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(6):693–712Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington R. Strategy after modernism: Recovering practice. Eur. Management Rev. (2004) 1(1):62–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willmott H., Hassard J., Pym D. Beyond paradigmatic closure in organizational enquiry. The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations: Critical Issues and New Perspectives (1990) (Routledge, London) 44–60Google Scholar
• Willmott H. Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(5):681–719Crossref, Google Scholar