Playing Offense vs. Defense: The Effects of Team Strategic Orientation on Team Process in Competitive Environments

References

• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):634–655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S. Assessing game theory, role playing, and unaided judgment. Internat. J. Forecasting (2002) 18(3):345–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(4):557–591Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Sormunen J., Parks D. Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(2):123–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Nijstad B. A., van Knippenberg D. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2008) 12(1):22–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations (1949) 2(2):129–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Driskell J. E., Salas E. Group decision making under stress. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76(3):473–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Jackson S. E. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):76–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Fahey L., Narayanan V. K. Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. (1983) 4(4):307–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989a) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989b) 32(3):543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Graebner M. E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):25–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot A. J. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psych. (1999) 34(3):169–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot A. J., Friedman R., Little B. R., Salmela-Aro K., Phillips S. D. Approach-avoidance: A central characteristic of personal goals. Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing (2007) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 97–118Google Scholar
• Elliot A. J., Harackiewicz J. M. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70(3):461–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericksen J., Dyer L. Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(3):438–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faddegon K., Ellemers N., Scheepers D. Eager to be the best, or vigilant not to be the worst: The emergence of regulatory focus in disjunctive and conjunctive group tasks. Group Processes Intergroup Relations (2009) 12(5):653–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faddegon K., Scheepers D., Ellemers N. If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2008) 38(5):880–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Xiao Y. Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1155–1169Link, Google Scholar
• Florack A., Hartmann J. Regulatory focus and investment decisions in small groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2007) 43(4):626–632Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forster J., Grant H., Idson L. C., Higgins E. T. Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2001) 37(3):253–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganesh U., Miree C. E., Prescott J. Competitive intelligence field research: Moving the field forward by setting a research agenda. J. Competitive Intelligence Management (2003) 1(1):1–14Google Scholar
• Gilad B. U. S. Intelligence system: Model for corporate chiefs? J. Bus. Strategy (1991) 12(3):20–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
• Green K. C. Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: A comparison of game theory, role-playing, and unaided judgment. Internat. J. Forecasting (2002) 18(3):321–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin M. A., Tesluk P. E., Jacobs R. R. Bargaining cycles and work-related attitudes: Evidence for threat-rigidity effects. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(6):1709–1725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas M. R. Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1170–1184Link, Google Scholar
• Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J., Lorsch J. W. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R.Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(2):253–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henry R. A. Improving group judgment accuracy: Information sharing and determining the best member. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 62(2):190–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heuer R.Psychology of Intelligence Analysis (1999) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Higgins E. T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psychologist (1997) 52(12):1280–1300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (1982) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Karau S. J., Williams K. D. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1993) 65(4):681–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110(2):265–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latane B., Williams K., Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 37(6):822–832Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee C., Tinsley C. H., Bobko P. An investigation of the antecedents and consequences of group-level confidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2002) 32(8):1628–1652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Higgins E. T., Choi H.-S. Development of strategic norms in groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):88–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1519–1533Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K., Belliveau M., Herndon B., Keller J. Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 103(2):159–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Littlepage G., Robison W., Reddington K. Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(2):133–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyles M. A., Schwenk C. R. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(2):155–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• May M. A., Doob L. W.Competition and Cooperation (1937) (Social Science Research Council, New York) Google Scholar
• May R. C., Stewart W. H., Sweo R. Environmental scanning behavior in a transitional economy: Evidence from Russia. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(3):403–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• McRaven W. H.SPEC OPS: Case Studies in Special Warfare: Theory and Practice (1996) (Presidio Press, Novato, CA) Google Scholar
• Menon T., Pfeffer J. Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):497–513Link, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Sci. (1978) 24(9):934–948Link, Google Scholar
• Moore D. A., Oesch J. M., Zietsma C. What competition? Myopic self-focus in market-entry decisions. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):440–454Link, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S., Barr P. S. Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(13):1395–1427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paese P. W., Bieser M., Tubbs M. E. Framing effects and choice shifts in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 56(1):149–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierro A., Kruglanski A. W., Higgins E. T. Regulatory mode and the joys of doing: Effects of “locomotion” and “assessment” on intrinsic and extrinsic task-motivation. Eur. J. Personality (2006) 20(5):355–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(Winter):95–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N. Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: Evidence from electric utility firms. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(10):761–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N., Finkelstein S. Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(S1):127–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M., Harvey O. J., White B. J., Hood W. R., Sherif C. W.Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment (1961) (University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, Norman) Google Scholar
• Simmel G.Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations (1955) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Sniezek J. A., Henry R. A. Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1989) 43(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegel S., Grant-Pillow H., Higgins E. T. How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2004) 34(1):39–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Stewart D. D., Wittenbaum G. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1995) 31(3):244–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):501–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein A. A. Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature. J. Conflict Resolution (1976) 20(1):143–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart D. D., Stasser G. Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1995) 69(4):619–628Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tasa K., Whyte G. Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96(2):119–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas J. B., McDaniel R. R. Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):286–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tindale R. S., Sheffey S., Scott L. A. Framing and group decision-making: Do cognitive changes parallel preference changes? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 55(3):470–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):942–962Link, Google Scholar
• Wason P. C., Johnson-Laird P. N.Thinking and Reasoning (1968) (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK) Google Scholar
• Wong S.-S. Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):645–656Link, Google Scholar
• Woolley A. W. Means vs. ends: Implications of process and outcome focus for team adaptation and performance. Organ. Sci. (2009a) 20(3):500–515Link, Google Scholar
• Woolley A. W. Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in knowledge work teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2009b) 30(3):427–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley A. W., Gerbasi M. E., Chabris C. F., Kosslyn S. M., Hackman J. Bringing in the experts: How team composition and work strategy jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Res. (2008) 39(3):352–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar