Overcoming Network Overload and Redundancy in Interorganizational Networks: The Roles of Potential and Latent Ties

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0634

References

  • Afuah A. (2000) How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management J. 21(2) 397–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3) 425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J. (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Baker W. E., Faulkner R. R., Fisher G. A. (1998) Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(2) 147–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A.-L., Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439) 509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4) 536–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biggart N. W., Delbridge R. (2004) Systems of exchange. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1) 28–49.Google Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J., Bessant J., Delbridge R. (2007) Finding, forming and performing: Creating new networks for discontinuous innovation. Calif. Management Rev. 49(3) 67–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breiger R. L. (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53(2) 181–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. (1992) Structural holes: The social structure of competition. , Nohria N., Eccles R., eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) , 57–91.Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2000a) Decay functions. Soc. Networks 22(1) 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2000b) The network structure of social capital. , Sutton R. I., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 22. (Elsevier/JAI, New York) , 345–423.Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2001) Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. , Lin N., Cook K. S., Burt R., eds. Social Capital: Theory and Research. (Aldine de Gruyter, Berlin) , 201–247.Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2) 349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coffey A., Atkinson P. (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement) S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danermark B., Ekstrom M., Jakobsen L., Karlsson J. (2002) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Dhanaraj C., Parkhe A. (2006) Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3) 659–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2) 147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 345–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4) 660–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Cho D. S., Chu W. (1998) Strategic supplier segmentation: The next “best practice” in supply chain management. Calif. Management Rev. 40(2) 57–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4) 532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfring T., Hulsink W. (2007) Networking by entrepreneurs: Patterns of tie-formation in emerging organizations. Organ. Stud. 28(12) 1849–1872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faems D., Janssens M., van Looy B. (2007) The initiation and evolution of interfirm knowledge transfer in R&D relationships. Organ. Stud. 28(11) 1699–1728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faulkner R. R. (1983) Music on Demand: Composer and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry. (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • Fichman M., Levinthal D. A. (1991) Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2) 442–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Benassi M. (1999) The dark side of social capital. , Leenders R. T. A. J., Gabbay S. M., eds. Corporate Social Capital and Liability. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) , 298–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6) 1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1992) Problems of explanation in economic sociology. , Nohria N., Eccles R., eds. Networks and Organizations. (Harvard Business Press, Boston) , 25–26.Google Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1995) Familiarity breeds trust? The implications of repeated ties. Acad. Management J. 38(1) 85–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439–1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M., Tatarynowicz A. (2012) The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 449–471.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational sub-units. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1) 82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. (1992) Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements toward a network theory of getting things done. , Nohria N., Eccles R., eds. Networks and Organizations. (Harvard Business Press, Boston) , 156–189.Google Scholar
  • Inkpen A. C., Tsang E. W. K. (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1) 146–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins M., Floyd S. (2001) Trajectories in the evolution of technology: A multi-level study of competition in Formula One racing. Organ. Stud. 22(6) 945–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5) 502–518.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. , Nohria N., Eccles R. G., eds. Network and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business Press, Boston) , 216–239.Google Scholar
  • Larson A. (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1) 76–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Cross R. (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11) 1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. (1988) Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(3) 345–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V., Campbell K. E. (1984) Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces 63(2) 482–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maurer I., Ebers M. (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(2) 262–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A. (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in comparative capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12) 1133–1156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen M. A., Semadeni M., Cannella A. (2009) Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organ. Sci. 20(3) 552–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L. (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3) 370–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muthusamy S. K., White M. A. (2005) Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organ. Stud. 26(3) 415–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2) 242–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nooteboom B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1) 100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. (2003) The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Res. Policy 32(9) 1695–1711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkhe A., Wasserman S., Ralston D. (2006) New frontiers in network theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3) 560–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parsons T. (1968) The Structure of Social Action, Vol. 2. (Free Press, Weber, NY) .Google Scholar
  • Patton M. Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Harper & Row, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3) 458–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W. (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. , Staw B. M., Cummings L. L., eds. Research in Organization Behavior, Vol. 12. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 295–336.Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W. (1998) Learning from collaboration. Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Calif. Management Rev. 40(3) 228–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1) 116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W., White D., Koput K., Owen-Smith J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4) 1132–1205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pye M. (2001) Autosport directory 2001. . Autosport, http://www.autosport.com/directory/.Google Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., van de Ven A. H. (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. 13(7) 483–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Padula G. (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5) 669–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T. J., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. (2000) Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R. (1995) WANTED: A good network theory of organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2) 345–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seabright M., Levinthal D., Fichman M. (1992) The role of individual attachments in interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management J. 35(1) 122–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V., Li S. X. (2012) The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 472–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6) 1546–1588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2) 266–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starkey K., Barnatt C., Tempest S. (2000) Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organ. Sci. 11(3) 299–305.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steier L., Greenwood R. (2000) Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. Organ. Stud. 21(1) 163–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A., Corbin J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Todeva E. (2006) Business Networks: Strategy and Structure. (Routledge, London) .Google Scholar
  • Tsai W., Ghoshal S. (1998) Social capital and value creation: An empirical study of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. 41(4) 464–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(August) 481–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Gillespie J. J. (2002) Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and the firm's debt performance. Strategic Management J. 23(7) 595–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684) 440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E. (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(1) 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Soda G. (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1) 1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A. (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Acad. Management J. 43(5) 925–950.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.