The (N)Ever-Changing World: Stability and Change in Organizational Routines

References

• Abbott A. Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1995) 21:93–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbott A., Hrycak A. Measuring resemblance in sequence data: An optimal matching analysis of musicians' careers. Amer. J. Sociol. (1990) 96(1):144–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbott A., Tsay A. Sequence analysis and optimal matching in sociology: Review and prospect. Sociol. Methods Res. (2000) 29(1):3–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Anderson T. W., Goodman L. A. Statistical inference about Markov chains. Ann. Math. Statist. (1957) 28(1):89–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Fried Y. The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations (1988) 41(4):305–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker J. R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):408–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M. C. The concept of routines: Some clarifications. Cambridge J. Econom. (2005) 29(2):249–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz J. P., Cohen M. D., Hoch S. V. Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):315–332Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Barringer H. R., Blanksten G. I., Mack R. W. Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory (1965) (Schenkman, Cambridge, MA) 19–48Google Scholar
• Carley K. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):20–46Link, Google Scholar
• Chatfield C. Statistical inference regarding Markov chain models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C (1973) 22(1):7–20Google Scholar
• Cohen M. Commentary on the Organization Science special issue on complexity. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):373–376Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D. Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(5):773–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):554–568Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• D'Adderio L. Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):321–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Adderio L. The dependable transfer of routines and capabilities: How replication strategy is performed in practice. (2008) Paper presented at the 24th EGOS ColloquiumJuly 10–12(European Group for Organizational Studies, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
• Douglas A., Coleman S., Oddy R. The case for ISO 9000. TQM Magazine (2003) 15(5):316–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):685–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egidi M., Narduzzo A. The emergence of path-dependent behaviors in cooperative contexts. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1997) 15(6):677–709Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. (2010) 35(2):202–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T., Becker M. C. Issues in empirical field studies of organizational routines. Handbook of Organizational Routines (2008) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 281–300Google Scholar
• Gottman J. M., Roy A. K.Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavioral Researchers (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heritage J.Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (1984) (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Hewes D. E., Monge P. R., Capella J. Stochastic modeling of communication processes. Multivariate Techniques in Human Communication Research (1980) 65(Academic Press, New York) 56–73Google Scholar
• Hillison D. Digitally-enabled organizational routines at the organization-environment boundary: Buffering and the role of technology. (2009) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East LansingGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Watson C. S. Auditory psychophysics and perception. Annual Rev. Psych. (1996) 47:461–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollister M. Is optimal matching suboptimal? Sociol. Methods Res. (2009) 38(2):235–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J. A. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):618–636Link, Google Scholar
• Jain A. K., Duin R. P. W., Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition: A review. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence (2000) 22(1):4–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaspar F., Schuster H. G. Easily calculable measure for the complexity of spatiotemporal patterns. Phys. Rev. A (1987) 36(2):842–848Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruskal J. B., Wish M.Multidimensional Scaling (1978) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazaric N., Becker M. C. Routines and routinization: An exploration of some micro-cognitive foundations. Handbook of Organizational Routines (2008) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 205–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazaric N., Denis B. Routinisation and memorisation of tasks within a workshop: The case of the introduction of ISO norms. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):873–896Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi P. M., Barley S. R. Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inform. Organ. (2008) 18(3):159–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller K. D., Pentland B. T., Choi S. Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. J. Management Stud. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):698–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(9):1435–1448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouellette J. A., Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psych. Bull. (1998) 124(7):54–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Rueter H. H. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart (1994) 39(3):484–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):781–795Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inform. Organ. (2008) 18(4):235–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Hærem T., Hillison D. Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. (2010) 31(7):917–940Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 32(2):194–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. Using paradox to build management and organizational theories. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):562–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schank R. C., Abelson R. P.Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures (1977) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Schulz M., Becker M. C. Staying on track: A voyage to the internal mechanisms of routine reproduction. Handbook of Organizational Routines (2008) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 228–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Applying information technology to organization design. Public Admin. Rev. (1973) 33(3):268–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(4):689–709Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H., Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):567–582Link, Google Scholar
• van der Aalst W. M. P., Weijters A. J. M. M. Process mining: A research agenda. Comput. Indust. (2004) 53(3):231–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanderfeesten I., Reijers H. A., van der Aalst W., Cardoso J., Mendling J., Fischer L. Quality metrics for business process models. BPM and Workflow Handbook (2007) (Future Strategies, Lighthouse Point, FL) 179–190Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Wood W., Quinn J. M., Kashy D. A. Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 83(6):1281–1297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar