The Division of Gains from Complementarities in Human-Capital-Intensive Activity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0659

References

  • Adams J. S. (1963) Toward an understanding of inequity. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 67(5) 422–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S. (1990) Shared learning. Management Sci. 36(8) 938–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P. S. (1993) The learning bureaucracy: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.. , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 111–194.Google Scholar
  • Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5) 777–795.Google Scholar
  • Amason A. C., Mooney A. C. (2008) The Icarus paradox revisited: How strong performance sows the seeds of dysfunction in future strategic decision-making. Strategic Organ. 6(4) 407–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B. N., Galetovic A., Stein A. (2007) Incentives versus synergies in markets for talent. . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Zivin J. S. G., Wang J. (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2) 549–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, Vol. 1. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barra A. (2001) By the numbers. Wall Street Journal (April 27) W10.Google Scholar
  • Beaulieu N. D., Zimmerman A. M. G. (2005) The New England Patriots: Making the team. . HBS Case 9-905-011, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Bebchuk L. A., Cremers M., Peyer U. (2007) CEO centrality. . Harvard Law School Olin Discussion Paper 601, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Becker G. S., Murphy K. M. (1992) The division of labor, coordination costs and knowledge. Quart. J. Econom. 107(4) 1137–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berman S. L., Down J., Hill C. W. L. (2002) Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. 45(1) 13–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berri D. J., Jewell R. T. (2004) Wage inequality and firm performance: Professional basketball's natural experiment. Atlantic Econom. J. 32(2) 130–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berri D. J., Schmidt M. B., Brook S. L. (2004) Stars at the gate: The impact of star power on NBA gate revenues. J. Sports Econom. 5(1) 33–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. (Chicago University Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B. (1980) A computer simulation test of the M-form hypothesis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(3) 457–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell J. Y., Lettau M., Malkiel B. G., Xu Y. (2001) Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. J. Finance 56(1) 1–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E. (2001) Reflections on shared cognition. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2) 195–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chacar A. S., Hesterly W. (2008) Institutional settings and rent appropriation by knowledge-based employees: The case of major league baseball. Managerial Decision Econom. 29(2–3) 117–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen B. P., Zhou X. (1991) Status processes in enduring work groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56(2) 179–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1) 128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A., Dillon J., Roloff K. (2007) Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Acad. Management Ann. 1 269–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eschker E., Perez S. J., Siegler M. V. (2004) The NBA and the influx of international basketball players. Appl. Econom. 36(10) 1009–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D., Roy R. R. (2008) The dual role of modularity: Innovation and imitation. Management Sci. 54(5) 939–955.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Ramasubbu N., Krishnan M. S. (2012) Does complexity deter customer-focus? Strategic Management J. 33(2) 137–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felps W., Mitchell T. R., Byington E. (2006) How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. , Staw B. M., ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 175–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frei F. X., Campbell D. (2006) Moneyball (A): What are you paying for? . HBS Case 9-606-025, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Gibson C., Vermeulen F. (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 202–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilson R. J., Mnookin R. H. (1985) Sharing among human capitalists: An economic inquiry into the corporate law firm and how partners split profits. Stanford Law Rev. 37(2) 313–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griliches Z. (1996) The discovery of the residual: A historical note. J. Econom. Literature 34(3) 1324–1330.Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Lee L.-E., Nanda A. (2008a) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Sci. 54(7) 1213–1230.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Sant L., Abrahams R. (2008b) When “stars” migrate, do they still perform like stars? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(1) 41–46.Google Scholar
  • Hansmann H. (1996) The Ownership of Enterprise. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Harder J. W. (1992) Play for pay: Effects of inequity in a pay-for-performance context. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2) 321–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Price K. H., Gavin J. H., Florey A. T. (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45(5) 1029–1045.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J. A., Leonard G. K. (1997) Superstars in the National Basketball Association: Economic value and policy. J. Labor Econom. 15(4) 586–624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman R. W. (2002–2003) The hidden costs of lawyer mobility: Of law firms, law schools, and the education of lawyers. Kentucky Law J. 91 299.Google Scholar
  • Huckman R. S., Pisano G. P. (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4) 473–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman R. S., Staats B. R., Upton D. M. (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1) 85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3) 291–313.Google Scholar
  • Idson T., Kahane L. (2004) Teammate effects on pay. Appl. Econom. Lett. 11(12) 731–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn L. M. (2000) The sports business as a labor market laboratory. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(3) 75–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5) 965–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R. (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(1) 81–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keyton J. (1999) Analyzing interaction patterns in dysfunctional teams. Small Group Res. 30(4) 491–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiersh E. (1994) High and not so mighty. Golf (December) 88–89.Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5) 502–518.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7) 934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt S. D., Venkatesh S. A. (2000) An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang's finances. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3) 755–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis M. (2009) The no-stats all-star. New York Times (February 15) MM26.Google Scholar
  • MacDonald G., Ryall M. D. (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10) 1319–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A. (1958) Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • McDonnell M. (1998) Brains behind golf's bright young master. Daily Mail (April 8) 75.Google Scholar
  • Mill J. S. (1848) Principles of Political Economy. (Longmans, Green & Co., London) .Google Scholar
  • Miller D., Shamsie J. (1996) The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad. Management J. 39(3) 519–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Millhiser W. P., Coen C. A., Solow D. (2011) Understanding the role of worker interdependence in team selection. Organ. Sci. 22(3) 772–787.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Bassoff P., Moorman C. (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2) 304–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S. (1985) Local sports teams and celebration of community: A comparative analysis of the home advantage. Sociol. Quart. 26(4) 507–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C., Miner A. S. (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4) 698–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulin H. (1995) Cooperative Microeconomics: A Game-Theoretic Introduction. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler J., Thompson L., Van Boven L. (2003) Learning negotiation skills: Four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Sci. 49(4) 529–540.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. (2002) Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 370–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver D. (2004) Basketball on Paper: Rules and Tools for Performance Analysis. (Potomac Books, Dulles, VA) .Google Scholar
  • Papke L. E., Wooldridge J. M. (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. J. Econometrics 145(1–2) 121–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Davis-Blake A. (1986) Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience mediates the succession effect. Acad. Management J. 29(1) 72–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Argote L., Brooks D. (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6) 869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rico R., Sánchez-Manzanares M., Gil F., Gibson C. (2008) Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1) 163–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W. (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6) 824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. (1981) The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(5) 845–858.Google Scholar
  • Rumelt R. P. (1984) Toward a strategic theory of the firm. , Lamb R. B., ed. Competitive Strategic Management. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) , 556–570.Google Scholar
  • Scott F. A., Long J. E., Somppi K. (1985) Salary vs. marginal revenue product under monopsony and competition: The case of professional basketball. Atlantic Econom. J. 13(3) 50–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scully G. W. (1974) Pay and performance in Major League Baseball. Amer. Econom. Rev. 64(6) 915–930.Google Scholar
  • Scully G. W. (1994) Managerial efficiency and survivability in professional team sports. Managerial Decision Econom. 15(5) 403–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaiken H., Lopez S., Mankita I. (1997) Two routes to team production: Saturn and Chrysler compared. Indust. Relations 36(1) 17–45.Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6) 467–482.Google Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Hoang H. (1995) Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3) 474–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stiroh K. J. (2007) Playing for keeps: Pay and performance in the NBA. Econom. Inquiry 45(1) 145–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan A. (2001) Resource partitioning and the evolution of specialist organizations: The role of location and identity in the U.S. wine industry. Acad. Management J. 44(6) 1169–1185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Tziner A., Eden D. (1985) Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? J. Appl. Psych. 70(1) 85–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R., Gordon F. M. (2005) As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organ. Sci. 16(6) 687–700.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3) 357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , Sutton R. I., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 81–123.Google Scholar
  • Wolfe R. A., Weick K. E., Usher J. M., Terborg J. R., Poppo L., Murrell A. J., Dukerich J. M., Core D. C., Dickson K. E., Jourdan J. S. (2005) Sport and organizational studies: Exploring synergy. J. Management Inquiry 14(2) 182–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zak T. A., Huang C. J., Siegfried J. J. (1979) Production efficiency: The case of professional basketball. J. Bus. 52(3) 379–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.