Knowing Where You Stand: Physical Isolation, Perceived Respect, and Organizational Identification Among Virtual Employees

References

• Ashforth B. E., Mael F. (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1) 20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey D. E., Kurland N. B. (2002) A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. J. Organ. Behav. 23(4) 383–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6) 1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel C. A. (2001) Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members' organizational identity and identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3) 379–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister R. F., Leary M. R. (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. 117(3) 497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergami M., Bagozzi R. P. (2000) Self-categorization and commitment as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to antecedents and consequences. British J. Soc. Psych. 39(Part 4) 555–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader S. L., Tyler T. R. (2009) Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2) 445–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake J. (2010) More workers are choosing fear over flex time, experts say. . CNN (March 29), http://articles.cnn.com/living/flex.time_1_flex-time-sylvia-ann-hewlett-workplace-experts?_s=PM:LIVING.Google Scholar
• Branscombe N. R., Spears R., Ellemers N., Doosje B. (2002) Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(6) 744–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burisch M. (1984) Approaches to personality inventory construction. A comparison of merits. Amer. Psych. 39(3) 214–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper C. D., Kurland N. B. (2002) Virtual work, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 23(4) 511–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Pearlson K. (1998) Two cheers for the virtual office. Sloan Management Rev. 39(4) 51–65.Google Scholar
• De Cremer D. (2002) Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28(10) 1335–1341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Cremer D., Tyler T. R. (2005) A matter of intragroup status: The importance of respect for the viability of groups. , Thomas-Hunt M. C., ed. Status and Groups: Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 7. (Elsevier Science Press, Oxford, UK) , 1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DuBrin A. J. (1991) Comparison of the job satisfaction and productivity of virtual workers versus in-house employees: A research note on work in progress. Psych. Rep. 68(3) 1223–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukerich J. M., Golden B. R., Shortell S. M. (2002) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3) 507–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2) 239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N., Doosje B., Spears R. (2004) Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 34(2) 155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emler N., Hopkins N. (1990) Reputation, social identity, and the self. , Abrams D., Hogg M. A., eds. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. (Springer-Verlag, New York) , 113–130.Google Scholar
• Feldman D. C., Gainey T. W. (1997) Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: Framing the research agenda. Human Resource Management Rev. 7(4) 369–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gainey T. W., Kelley D. E., Hill J. A. (1999) Telecommuting's impact on corporate culture and individual workers: Examining the effect of employee isolation. SAM Advanced Management J. 64(Autumn) 4–10.Google Scholar
• Gajendran R. S., Harrison D. A. (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about virtual work: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6) 1524–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden T. D., Veiga J. F. (2005) The impact of extent of virtual work on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. J. Management 31(2) 301–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden T. D., Veiga J. F., Dino R. N. (2008) The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? J. Appl. Psych. 93(6) 1412–1421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K., Locke K. (1997) Composing Qualitative Research. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
• Hill E. J., Miller B. C., Weiner S. P., Colihan J. (1998) Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel Psych. 51(3) 667–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1) 121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Hardie E. A., Reynolds K. J. (1995) Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 25(2) 159–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jetten J., Branscombe N. R., Spears R. (2002) On being peripheral: Effects of identity security on personal and collective self-esteem. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 32(1) 105–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M. (1991) Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 191–228.Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M. (1998) Paranoid cognition in social systems. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(4) 251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurland N. B., Bailey D. E. (1999) Telework: The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime. Organ. Dynam. 28(Autumn) 53–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind E. A., Tyler T. R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. (Plenum Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mael F. A., Ashforth B. E. (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13(2) 103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason J. C. (1992) Flexing more than muscle: Employees want time on their side. Management Rev. 81(3) 6–9.Google Scholar
• McCloskey D. W., Igbaria M. (2003) Does “out of sight” mean “out of mind”? An empirical investigation of the career advancements prospects of virtual workers. Inform. Resources Management J. 16(2) 19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L. (1985) Social categorization and the assimilation of “new” group members. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(5) 1173–1190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilles J. M. (1994) Making Telecommuting Happen: A Guide for Telemanagers and Telecommuters. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York) .Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G. (1998) To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. , Whetten D. A., Godfrey P. C., eds. Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) , 171–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2) 367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockmann K. W., Pratt M. G., Northcraft G. B. (2007) Divided loyalties: Determinants of identification in interorganizational teams. Small Group Res. 38(6) 727–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon B., Stürmer S. (2003) Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(2) 183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith H. J., Tyler T. R. (1997) Choosing the right pond: The influence of the status of one's group and one's status in that group on self-esteem and group-oriented behaviors. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 33(2) 146–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples D. S., Hulland J. S., Higgins C. A. (1999) A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. 10(6) 758–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. , Worchel S., Austin W. G., eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago) , 7–24.Google Scholar
• Thatcher S. M. B., Zhu X. (2006) Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4) 1076–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R. (1989) The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(5) 830–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R. (1994) Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(5) 850–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R. (1999) Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. , Sutton R. I., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21. (JAI Press, Stamford, CT) , 201–246.Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. (2000) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. (Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia) .Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. (2002) Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 89(1) 813–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25 115–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Degoey P., Smith H. (1996) Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(5) 913–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L., Kossek E. E., Lobel S. (2007) Less need to be there: Cross level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB. Human Relations 60(8) 1123–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D. (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Appl. Psych.: Internat. Rev. 49(3) 357–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D., Hogg M. A. (2003) A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. , Staw B. M., Kramer R. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 243–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte W. H. (1956) The Organization Man. (Simon & Schuster, New York) .Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. (1999) Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ. Sci. 10(6) 777–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. (2001) Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. J. Management 27(2) 213–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WorldatWork (2009) Telework trendlines 2009. . Report, WorldatWork, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar