Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

References

• Alvesson M. (1996) Communication, Power and Organization. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel C. A., Garud R. (2003) Narrative knowledge in action: Adaptive abduction as a mechanism for knowledge creation and exchange in organizations. , Eastery-Smith M., Lyles M. A., eds. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. (Blackwell, Malden, MA) , 324–342.Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3) 312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. (2006) Talking about machines, thick description, and knowledge work. Organ. Stud. 27(12) 1757–1768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V. (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4) 350–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5) 555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9) 1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Clegg C. W., Wall T. D., Pepper K., Stride C., Woods D., Morrison D., Cordery J., et al. (2002) An international survey of the use and effectiveness of modern manufacturing practices. Human Factors Ergonomics Manufacturing 12(2) 171–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corlett W. S. (1989) Community Without Unity: A Politics of Derridian Extravagance. (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2) 179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Engeström Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. (Orienta Konsultit, Helsinki, Finland) .Google Scholar
• Engeström Y. (1995) Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence Medicine 7(5) 395–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engeström Y., Blackler F. (2005) On the life of the object. Organization 12(3) 307–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewenstein B., Whyte J. (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as epistemic objects. Organ. Stud. 30(1) 7–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubrium J. F., Holstein J. A. (2007) The construction mosaic. , Holstein J. A., Gubrium J. F., eds. Handbook of Constructionist Research. (Guilford Press, New York) , 3–12.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O., Lundberg N. (2001) Designing work oriented infrastructures. J. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 10(3–4) 347–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson K. (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci., Tech. Human Values 16(4) 448–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin V., Nardi B. A. (2006) Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina K. (1997) Sociality with objects. Theory, Culture Soc. 14(4) 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koskinen K. U. (2005) Metaphoric boundary objects as co-ordinating mechanisms in the knowledge sharing of innovation processes. Eur. J. Innovation Management 8(3) 323–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B. (1996) On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, Activity 3(4) 228–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J. (2002) On hidden heterogeneities: Complexity, formalism, and aircraft design. , Law J., Mol A., eds. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) , 116–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E., Mohrman S., Ledford G. (1992) Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
• Leont'ev A. N. (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Levina N. (2005) Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2) 109–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N., Vaast E. (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2) 335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miettinen R. (2005) Object of activity and individual motivation. Mind, Culture, Activity 12(1) 53–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miettinen R., Virkkunen J. (2005) Epistemic objects, artefacts, and organizational change. Organization 12(3) 437–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D. (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. 30(12) 1391–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D. (2011) Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22(3) 602–620.Link, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G., Bechky B. (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Ann. Acad. Management 3(1) 463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3) 249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9) 1435–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. (2010) The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge J. Econom. 34(1) 125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orr J. E. (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) .Google Scholar
• Osterlund C., Carlile P. (2003) How practice matters: A relational view of knowledge sharing. , Huysman M., Wenger E., Wulf V., eds. Communities and Technologies. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) , 1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswick C., Robertson M. (2009) Boundary objects reconsidered: From bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. J. Change Management 9(2) 179–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pawlowski S. D., Robey D. (2004) Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. 28(4) 645–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafaeli A., Pratt M. G. (2006) Artifacts and Organization: Beyond Mere Symbolism. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Rheinberger H. (2005) A reply to David Bloor: “Toward a sociology of epistemic things”. Perspect. Sci. 13(3) 406–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rheinberger H.-J. (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) .Google Scholar
• Silverman B. S. (2007) A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book About Qualitative Research. (Sage, London) .Google Scholar
• Spradley J. P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) .Google Scholar
• Star S. L. (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. Amer. Behav. Sci. 43(3) 377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S. L. (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci., Tech. Human Values 35(5) 601–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3) 389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S. L., Ruhleder K. (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1) 111–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A. L. (1993) Continual Permutations of Action. (Columbia University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Suchman L. A. (2007) Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Swan J. (2006) Commentary on Wanda Orlikowski's “Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability”. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(5) 467–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swan J., Bresnen M., Newell S., Robertson M. (2007) The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations 60(12) 1809–1837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor J. R., Robichaud D. (2004) Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization 11(3) 395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trist E., Bamforth K. (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations 4(1) 3–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trompette P., Vinck D. (2009) Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 3(1) 3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wartofsky M. W. (1979) Models: Representation and the Scientific Understanding. (Riedel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenger E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yanow D., Schwartz-Shea P. (2006) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) .Google Scholar
• Zeiss R., Groenewegen P. (2009) Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement. Organization 16(1) 81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar