Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control

References

• Ajzen I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2) 179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Greve H. R. (2007) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3) 337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Harrison S. H., Corley K. G. (2008) Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. J. Management 34(3) 325–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astrachan J. H., Jaskiewicz P. (2008) Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately-held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. Family Bus. Rev. 21(2) 139–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belk R. W. (1988) Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. 15(2) 139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belk R. W. (1991) The ineluctable mysteries of possessions. J. Soc. Behav. Personality 6(6) 17–55.Google Scholar
• Belk R. W. (1992) Attachment to possessions. , Altman I., Low S. M., eds. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 12. (Plenum Press, New York) , 37–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berrone P., Cruz C. C., Gómez-Mejía L. R., Larraza Kintana M. (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1) 82–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal J. A. (2009) The effect of group deliberation on the endowment effect: An experimental study. . Working paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. http://ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1427918.Google Scholar
• Boyce R. R., Brown T. C., McClelland G. H., Peterson G. L., Schulze W. D. (1992) An experimental examination of intrinsic values as a source of the WTA-WTP disparity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(5) 1366–1373.Google Scholar
• Burkart M., Panunzi F., Shleifer A. (2003) Family firms. J. Finance 58(5) 2167–2201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burmeister K., Schade C. (2007) Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias. J. Bus. Venturing 22(3) 340–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmon Z., Ariely D. (2000) Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. J. Consumer Res. 27(3) 360–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carney M. (2005) Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(3) 249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr C. (2005) Are German, Japanese and Anglo-Saxon strategic decision styles still different in the context of globalization? J. Management Stud. 42(6) 1155–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., Litz R. (2003) A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. J. Bus. Venturing 18(4) 467–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., Litz R. (2004) Comparing the agency costs of family and nonfamily firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(4) 335–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., Sharma P. (2005) Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(5) 555–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., Pearson A. W., Barnett T. (2012) Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 36(2) 267–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J., Bergiel E. B. (2009) An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 33(2) 355–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J., Chang E. P. C. (2004) Are family firms born or made? An exploratory investigation. Family Bus. Rev. 17(1) 37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J., Sharma P. (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 23(4) 19–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J., Sharma P. (2003) Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Bus. Rev. 16(2) 89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill N. C., Hatten K. J. (1987) Non-market based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business. Amer. J. Small Bus. 11(3) 53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Combs J. G., Penney C. R., Crook T. R., Short J. C. (2010) The impact of family representation on CEO compensation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 34(6) 1125–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coursey D. L., Hovis J. L., Schulze W. D. (1987) The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. Quart. J. Econom. 102(3) 679–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cruz C. C., Gómez-Mejía L. R., Becerra M. (2010) Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Acad. Management J. 53(1) 69–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curasi C. F., Price L. L., Arnould E. J. (2004) How individuals' cherished possessions become families' inalienable wealth. J. Consumer Res. 31(3) 609–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Malden, MA) .Google Scholar
• Daeppen M., Roth V. (2005) Swiss national business finance survey. . Report, Swiss National Institute of Statistics, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Dahl D. (2008) The most valuable companies in America. Inc. Magazine 30(April) 96–105.Google Scholar
• De Massis A., Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J. (2008) Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Bus. Rev. 21(2) 183–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer W. G., Whetten D. A. (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(6) 785–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eddleston K. A., Kellermanns F. W. (2007) Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 22(4) 545–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eddleston K. A., Kellermanns F. W., Sarathy R. (2008) Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. J. Management Stud. 45(1) 26–50.Google Scholar
• Galin A., Gross M., Kella-Egozy I., Sapir S. (2006) The endowment effect in individual and team negotiations. . Working Paper 8/2006, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv. http://recanati.tau.ac.il/Eng/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/WP_8-2006_Galin_Gross.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gedajlovic E., Lubatkin M., Schulze W. S. (2004) Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. J. Management Stud. 41(5) 899–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick K. E., Davis J. A., Hampton M. M., Lansberg I. (1997) Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía L. R., Larraza-Kintana M., Makri M. (2003) The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Acad. Management J. 46(2) 226–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía L. R., Makri M., Larraza-Kintana M. (2010) Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. J. Management Stud. 47(2) 223–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía L. R., Núñez-Nickel M., Gutierrez I. (2001) The role of family ties in agency contracts. Acad. Management J. 44(1) 81–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía L. R., Haynes K. T., Núñez-Nickel M., Jacobson K. J. L., Moyano-Fuentes J. (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1) 106–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grayson K., Shulman D. (2000) Indexicality and the verification function of irreplaceable possessions: A semiotic analysis. J. Consumer Res. 27(1) 17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guenterberg B. (2007) IfM Umsatzsteuerstatistik. . Report, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Black B., Babin B., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Hamilton B. H., Nickerson J. A. (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1) 51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. (2001) Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
• Holt D. T., Rutherford M. W., Kuratko D. F. (2010) Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Bus. Rev. 23(1) 76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horowitz J. K., McConnell K. E. (2002) A review of WTA/WTP studies. J. Environ. Econom. Management 44(3) 426–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howorth C., Westhead P., Wright M. (2004) Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. J. Bus. Venturing 19(4) 509–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoy F., Verser T. G. (1994) Emerging business, emerging field: Entrepreneurship and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 19(1) 9–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James H. S. (1999) Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 6(1) 41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1) 85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. (1993) rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2) 306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janjuha-Jivraj S., Spence L. J. (2009) The nature of reciprocity in family firm succession. Internat. Small Bus. J. 27(6) 702–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4) 305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1) 17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979a) Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. , Makridakis S., Wheelwright S. C., eds. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 12. (North-Holland, Amsterdam) , 313–327.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979b) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2) 263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6) 1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1) 193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellermanns F. W., Eddleston K. A., Barnett T., Pearson A. (2008) An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Bus. Rev. 21(1) 1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger N. F. (1993) The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 18(1) 5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N., Stern L. W., Anderson J. C. (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Management J. 36(6) 1633–1651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller I., Miller D., Steier L. P. (2004) Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 28(4) 305–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ling Y., Kellermanns F. W. (2010) The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. J. Management Stud. 47(2) 322–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Love L. G., Priem R. L., Lumpkin G. T. (2002) Explicitly articulated strategy and firm performance under alternative levels of centralization. J. Management 28(5) 611–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melin L., Nordqvist M. (2007) The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organ. 5(3) 321–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milton L. P. (2008) Unleashing the relationship power of family firms: Identity confirmation as a catalyst for performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 32(6) 1063–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morck R., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. (1988) Management ownership and market valuation. J. Financial Econom. 20(1–2) 293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nenova T. (2003) The value of corporate voting rights and control: A cross-country analysis. J. Financial Econom. 68(3) 325–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppenheim A. N. (1966) Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and perspectives. J. Management 12(4) 531–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollak R. A. (1985) A transaction cost approach to families and households. J. Econom. Literature 23(2) 581–608.Google Scholar
• Price L. L., Arnould E. J., Curasi C. F. (2000) Older consumers' disposition of special possessions. J. Consumer Res. 27(2) 179–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson W., Zeckhauer R. (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1) 7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz Kleine S., Menzel-Baker S. (2004) An integrative review of material possession attachment. Acad. Marketing Sci. Rev. 2004(1). . http://www.amsreview.org/articles/kleine01-2004.pdf.Google Scholar
• Schultz Kleine S., Kleine R. E., Allen C. T. (1995) How is a possession “me” or “not me”? Characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment. J. Consumer Res. 22(3) 327–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze W. S., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R. N., Buchholtz A. K. (2001) Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(2) 99–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Seidler J. (1974) On using key informants: A technique for collecting quantitative data and controlling measurement error in organization analysis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 39(6) 816–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. (Harper & Row, New York) .Google Scholar
• Sharma P., Manikutty S. (2005) Strategic divestment in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 20(3) 293–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd D. A., Zacharakis A. (2000) Structuring family business succession: An analysis of the future leader's decision making. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 24(4) 25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sternberg L., Lückgen I. (2005) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor—German Report. . Report, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed. (HarperCollins College Publishers, New York) .Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H. (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(1) 39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157) 1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59(4) S251–S278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4) 1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villalonga B., Amit R. (2006) How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? J. Financial Econom. 80(2) 385–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volery T., Bergmann H., Gruber M., Haour G., Leleux B. (2007) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. . 2007 Swiss Executive Report, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Wade-Benzoni K. A. (2002) A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Acad. Management J. 45(5) 1011–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson L. (1992) The Nature of Things: The Secret Life of Inanimate Objects. (Destiny Books, Rochester, VT) .Google Scholar
• Westhead P., Cowling M. (1998) Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 23(1) 31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westhead P., Howorth C. (2007) “Types” of private family firm: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 19(5) 405–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman R. M., Gómez-Mejía L. R. (1998) A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1) 133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Z., Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J. (2004) An exploration of agency problems in the family firm: The case of distributing equal shares to children. Proc. Admin. Sci. Assoc. Canada, Québec City, QC, Canada. . http://www.asac.ca/en/publications/conference-proceedings.Google Scholar
• Zellweger T. M., Astrachan J. H. (2008) On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Bus. Rev. 21(4) 347–363.Crossref, Google Scholar