Introduction to the Special Issue: Bringing Status to the Table—Attaining, Maintaining, and Experiencing Status in Organizations and Markets

References

• Anderson C., Kilduff G. J. (2009) The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(5) 295–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkow J. H. (1975) Strategies for self-esteem and prestige in Maradi, Niger Republic. , Williams T. R., ed. Psychological Anthropology. (Mouton Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands) , 373–388.Google Scholar
• Bendersky C., Hays N. A. (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C., Shah N. P. (2012) The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals' status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger C. J., Fisek M. H., Norman R. Z., Zelditch M. (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. (Elsevier, New York) .Google Scholar
• Bianchi A. J., Kang S. M., Stewart D. (2012) The organizational selection of status characteristics: Status evaluations in an open source community. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 341–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Blader S. L., Chen Y. (2011a) Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. . Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Blader S. L., Chen Y.-R. (2011b) What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organ. Sci. 22(4) 1040–1060.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. (1955) Class, status and power: A reader in social stratification. Amer. J. Sociol. 60(4) 410–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
• Bothner M. S., Kim Y.-K., Smith E. B. (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B. (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. 86(2) 307–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4) 557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Reagans R. E. (2011) Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1182–1194.Link, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (2009) Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
• Chen Y.-R., Brockner J., Greenberg J. (2003) When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 92(1–2) 1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid M. M., Loyd D. L., Tolbert P. S. (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Emerson R. M. (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1) 31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan E. T., Gruenfeld D. H. (1998) When needs outweigh desires: The effects of resource interdependence and reward interdependence on group problem solving. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 20(1) 45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. (2010) Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. , Fiske S. T., Gilbert D. T., Lindzey G., eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) , 941–982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J., Amanatullah E. T. (2012) Psyched up or psyched out? The influence of coactor status on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 402–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J., Reagans R. E., Amanatullah E. T., Ames D. R. (2006) Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6) 1123–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank R. H. (1985) Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• George E., Chattopadyay P., Zhang L. L. (2012) Helping hand or competition? The moderating influence of perceived upward mobility on the relationship between blended workgroups and employee attitudes and behaviors. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 355–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Glomb T. M., Liao H. (2003) Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influences, reciprocal, and individual effects. Acad. Management J. 46(4) 486–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldhamer H., Shils E. A. (1939) Types of power and status. Amer. J. Sociol. 45(2) 171–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6) 1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C. L., Van Vugt M. (2006) Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(10) 1402–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J., Gil-White F. J. (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol. Human Behav. 22(3) 165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American leadership theories apply abroad? Organ. Dynam. 9(1) 42–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan R., Hogan J. (1991) Personality and status. , Gilbert D. G., Connolly J. J., eds. Personality, Social Skills, and Psychopathology: An Individual Differences Approach. (Plenum Press, New York) , 137–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans G. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York) .Google Scholar
• House R., Rousseau D. M., Thomas-Hunt M. (1995) The MESO paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 17. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 71–114.Google Scholar
• Humphrey R. (1985) How work roles influence perception: Structural-cognitive processes and organizational behavior. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50(2) 242–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackman M. R. (1994) The Velvet Glove: Paternalism, and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44(2) 238–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost J. T., Banaji M. R. (1994) The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British J. Soc. Psych. 33(1) 1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost J. T., Banaji M. R., Nosek B. A. (2004) A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psych. 25(6) 881–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leavitt H. J. (2003) Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(3) 96–102.Google Scholar
• LeBlanc M. M., Barling J. (2004) Workplace aggression. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 13(1) 9–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner M. J. (1980) The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. (Plenum, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2 351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U., Tate G. (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4) 1593–1638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masling J., Greer F. L., Gilmore R. (1955) Status, authoritarianism, and sociometric choice. J. Soc. Psych. 41 297–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T., Phillips K. W. (2011) Getting even or being at odds? Cohesion in even- and odd-sized small groups. Organ. Sci. 22(3) 738–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. (1968) Science and democratic social structure. Social Theory and Social Structure, 3rd ed. (Free Press, New York) , 604–615.Google Scholar
• Moors A., De Houwer J. (2005) Automatic processing of dominance and submissiveness. Experiment. Psych. 52(4) 296–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P. D., Berry N. H. (1965) The relationship between an individual's sociometric status in different groups over a two-year period. J. Psych. 60(1) 31–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pareto V. (1991) The Rise and Fall of Elites: An Application of Theoretical Sociology. (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) . . [Orig. pub. 1968. Bedminster Press, Somerville, NJ.]Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L. (2011) Status in Management and Organizations. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L., Xu Q. J. (2012) Rating performance or contesting statust: Evidence against the homophily explanation for supervisor demographic skew in performance ratings. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 373–385.Link, Google Scholar
• Peterson R. S., Harvey S. (2009) Leadership and conflict: Using power to manage conflict in groups for better rather than worse. , Tjosvold D., Wisse B., eds. Power and Interdependence in Organizations. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) , 281–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J. (2001) Cultural construction of manhood in prison. Psych. Men Masculinity 2(1) 13–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J. (2005) Organizational genealogy and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3) 440–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J., Zuckerman E. W. (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2) 379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2) 367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Balkwell J. W. (1997) Group processes and the diffusion of status beliefs. Soc. Psych. Quart. 60(1) 14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Correll S. J. (2004) Motherhood as a status characteristic. J. Soc. Issues 60(4) 683–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Diekema D. (1989) Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 54(1) 79–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C., Walker H. A. (1995) Status structures. , Cook K. S., Fine G. A., House J. S., eds. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. (Allyn & Bacon, New York) , 281–310.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Backor K., Li Y. E., Tinkler J. E., Erickson K. G. (2009) How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1) 44–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachdev I., Bourhis R. Y. (1985) Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(4) 415–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapolsky R. M. (2005) Monkeyluv: And Other Essays on Our Lives as Animals. (Scribner, New York) .Google Scholar
• Saunder M. (2006) Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory Soc. 35(3) 299–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Ding W. W. (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1) 97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. , Worchel S., Austin W. G., eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago) , 7–24.Google Scholar
• Thye S. R. (2000) A status value theory of power in exchange relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(3) 407–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens L. Z. (2001) Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(1) 86–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilly C. (1998) The Power of Identity by Manuel Castells. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(6) 1730–1732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tormala Z. L., Briñol P., Petty R. E. (2007) Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It's all in the timing. Soc. Cognition 25(4) 536–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes P. J., Reicher S. D., Wetherell M. S. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. (2003) The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(4) 349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. , Zanna M. P., ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25. (Academic Press, San Diego) , 115–195.Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S., Oosterhof A. (2006) Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad. Management J. 49(5) 877–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D., Schippers M. C. (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58 515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Rueden C., Gurven M., Kaplan H. (2008) The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evol. Human Behav. 29(6) 402–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner D. G., Berger J. (1985) Do sociological theories grow? Amer. J. Sociol. 90(4) 697–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner D. G., Berger J. (1993) Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. , Berger J., Zelditch M., eds. Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in Theory Growth. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) , 23–63.Google Scholar
• Willer R. (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1) 23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar