Tribunal Specialization and Institutional Targeting in Patent Enforcement

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0669

References

  • American Bar Association (ABA) (1996) Concept paper on specialized courts. . Retrieved April 23, 2009, http://www.abanet.org/ceeli/publications/conceptpapers/speccourts/spc.html.Google Scholar
  • Argyres N., Mayer K. J. (2007) Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4) 1060–1077.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1) 99–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron D. P. (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. Calif. Management Rev. 37(2) 47–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron D. P. (1997a) Integrated strategy and international trade disputes: The Kodak-Fujifilm case. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(1) 291–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron D. P. (1997b) Integrated strategy, trade policy, and global competition. Calif. Management Rev. 39(2) 145–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron D. P. (1999) Integrated market and nonmarket strategies in client and interest group politics. Bus. Politics 1(1) 7–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum L. (1977) Judicial specialization, litigant influence, and substantive policy: The court of customs and patent appeals. Law Soc. Rev. 11(5) 823–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum L. (1994) Specialization and authority acceptance: The Supreme Court and lower federal courts. Political Res. Quart. 47(3) 693–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk L. A. (2000) Suits with negative expected value. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Vol. 3. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) , 551–554.Google Scholar
  • Beck L. E. (1987) Specialized courts and judicial review of administrative action: An analysis for future consideration. . Working paper, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Boddewyn J. J., Brewer T. L. (1994) International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1) 119–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonardi J.-P. (2004) Global and political strategies in deregulated industries: The asymmetric behaviors of former monopolies. Strategic Management J. 25(2) 101–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonardi J.-P., Keim G. D. (2005) Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3) 555–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz L. W., Gómez C., Spencer J. W. (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad. Management J. 43(5) 994–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J. (1995) International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. Acad. Management J. 38(2) 383–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarkson G., Toh P. K. (2010) “Keep out” signs: The role of deterrence in the competition for resources. Strategic Management J. 31(11) 1202–1225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooter R. D., Rubinfeld D. L. (1989) Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution. J. Econom. Literature 27(3) 1067–1097.Google Scholar
  • Cramton P. C. (1992) Strategic delay in bargaining with two-sided uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(1) 205–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currie D. P., Goodman F. I. (1975) Judicial review of federal administrative action: Quest for the optimum forum. Columbia Law Rev. 75(1) 1–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Figueiredo J., de Figueiredo R. (2002) The allocation of resources by interest groups: Lobbying, litigation and administrative regulation. Bus. Politics 4(2) . Article 4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delios A., Henisz W. J. (2000) Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economies. Acad. Management J. 43(3) 305–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dezalay Y., Garth B. G. (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4) 660–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10–11) 1105–1121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fink C., Maskus K. E. (2005) Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. (World Bank and Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Ginarte J. C., Park W. G. (1997) Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Res. Policy 26(3) 283–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen W. L., Johnson R. J., Unah I. (1995) Specialized courts, bureaucratic agencies, and the politics of U.S. trade policy. Amer. J. Political Sci. 39(3) 529–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. (1974) Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica 42(4) 679–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henisz W. J. (2003) The power of the Buckley and Casson thesis: The ability to manage institutional idiosyncrasies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(2) 173–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman A. J. (2003) Determinants of political strategies in U.S. multinationals. Bus. Soc. 42(4) 455–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman A. J., Hitt M. A. (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4) 825–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman A. J., Keim G. D., Schuler D. (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6) 837–857.Google Scholar
  • Hoetker G. (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4) 331–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G. (1980) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Holburn G., Vanden Bergh R. (2004) Influencing agencies through pivotal political institutions. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 20(2) 458–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holburn G. L. F., Vanden Bergh R. G. (2008) Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategies in regulated industries. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2) 521–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krupka R. G., Swain P. C., Levine R. E. (1993) Section 337 and the GATT: The problem or the solution? Amer. Univ. Law Rev. 42(Spring) 779–867.Google Scholar
  • Lanjouw J. O., Lerner J. (1998) The enforcement of intellectual property rights: A survey of the empirical literature. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique (49/50) 223–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lanjouw J. O., Schankerman M. (2001) Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND J. Econom. 32(1) 129–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Legomsky S. H. (1990) Specialized Justice: Courts, Administrative Tribunals, and a Cross-National Theory of Specialization. (Oxford University Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenway S. A., Rehbein K. (1991) Leaders, followers, and free riders: An empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement. Acad. Management J. 34(4) 893–905.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma C.-T. A., Manove M. (1993) Bargaining with deadlines and imperfect player control. Econometrica 61(6) 1313–1339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D. (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econom. 3(4) 303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McMillan G. S., Hamilton R. D. (2000) Using bibliometrics to measure firm knowledge: An analysis of the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 12(4) 465–475.Google Scholar
  • Murtha T. P., Lenway S. A. (1994) Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations' strategies. Strategic Management J. 15(S2) 113–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • North D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. (W. W. Norton, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oxley J. E. (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(3) 283–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parmigiani A. (2007) Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategic Management J. 28(3) 285–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pegram J. B. (2006) Improving federal court adjudication of patent cases. . Statement before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Accessed April 23, 2009, http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/pegram100605.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Peng M. W. (2002a) Cultures, institutions, and strategic choices: Toward an institutional perspective on business strategy. , Gannon M. J., Newman K. I., eds. The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) , 52–66.Google Scholar
  • Peng M. W. (2002b) Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific J. Management 19(2–3) 251–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A. (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3) 179–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Priest G. L., Klein B. (1984) The selection of disputes for litigation. J. Legal Stud. 13(1) 1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Revesz R. L. (1997) Environmental regulation, ideology, and the D.C. Circuit. Virginia Law Rev. 83(8) 1717–1772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A. E., Murnighan J. K., Schoumaker F. (1988) The deadline effect in bargaining: Some experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4) 806–823.Google Scholar
  • Rubin P. H., Curran C., Curran J. F. (2001) Litigation versus legislation: Forum shopping by rent seekers. Public Choice 107(3–4) 295–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sartori A. E. (2003) An estimator for some binary-outcome selection models without exclusion restrictions. Political Anal. 11(2) 111–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuler D. A. (1996) Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Acad. Management J. 39(3) 720–737.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuler D. A., Rehbein K., Cramer R. D. (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4) 659–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Shaffer B. (1995) Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. J. Management 21(3) 495–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shriver E. P. (1996) Separate but equal: Intellectual property importation and the recent amendments to Section 337. Minnesota J. Global Trade 5(Summer) 441–465.Google Scholar
  • Somaya D. (2003) Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management J. 24(1) 17–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Somaya D. (2004) Firm strategies and trends in patent litigation in the United States. , Libecap G., ed. Innovation in New Markets: The Impact of Deregulation on Airlines, Financial Markets, and Telecommunications. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, Vol. 2. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 103–148.Google Scholar
  • Somaya D., Williamson I. O., Zhang X. (2007) Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance. Organ. Sci. 18(6) 922–937.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spier K. E. (1992) The dynamics of pretrial negotiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(1) 93–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spier K. E. (2007) Litigation. , Polinsky A. M., Shavell S., eds. The Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 1. (Elsevier, Amsterdam) , 259–342.Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L. (1965) Social structure and organizations. , March J. G., ed. Handbook of Organizations. (Rand McNally, Chicago) , 142–193.Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7) 509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner S. F., Mitchell W., Bettis R. A. (2010) Responding to rivals and complements: How market concentration shapes generational product innovation strategy. Organ. Sci. 21(4) 854–872.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Unah I. (1997) Specialized courts of appeals' review of bureaucratic actions and the politics of protectionism. Political Res. Quart. 50(4) 851–878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unah I. (1998) The Courts of International Trade: Judicial Specialization, Expertise, and Bureaucratic Policy-Making. (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vanden Bergh R. G., Holburn G. L. F. (2007) Targeting corporate political strategy: Theory and evidence from the U.S. accounting industry. Bus. Politics 9(2) . Article 1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wald P. M. (1982) Judicial review of complex administrative agency decisions. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 462(July) 72–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2) 171–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G. (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10) 991–995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoffie D. (1987) Corporate strategy for political action: A rational model. , Marcus A. A., Kaufman A. M., Beam D. R., eds. Business Strategy and Public Policy: Perspectives from Industry and Academia. (Quorum Books, New York) , 92–111.Google Scholar
  • Zaheer S. (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. 38(2) 341–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer S. (2002) The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. J. Internat. Management 8(3) 351–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ziedonis R. H. (2004) Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. 50(6) 804–820.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.