The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0673

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Allen T. J. (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Amabile T. M. (1982) Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(5) 997–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4) 634–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Dholakia U. M. (2006) Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Sci. 52(7) 1099–1115.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Kunda G. (2001) Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. 12(1) 76–95.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3) 312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benkler Y. (2004) “Sharing nicely”: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law J. 114(2) 273–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks 21(4) 375–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. (2002) UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. (User's manual, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 40–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2) 349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5) 555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G., Ferriani S. (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6) 824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement 20(1) 37–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2) 119–135.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crane D. (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Csikszentmihalyi M. (1996) Creativity: Flow and Psychology of Discovery and Invention. (HarperCollins, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Dahlander L., O'Mahony S. (2011) Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organ. Sci. 22(4) 961–979.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doty H. D., Glick W. H. (1998) Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organ. Res. Methods 1(4) 374–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas M. (1986) How Institutions Think. (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY) .Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2) 179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (2002) Grounded theory research methods. , Baum J. A. C., ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) , 849–866.Google Scholar
  • Fauchart E., von Hippel E. (2008) Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organ. Sci. 19(2) 187–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleck L. (1935) Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. (Schwabe und Co., Verlagsbuchhandlung, Basel, Switzerland) .Google Scholar
  • Fleming L., Waguespack D. M. (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2) 165–180.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garton L., Haythornthwaite C., Wellman B. (1997) Studying online social networks. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 3(1). . http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/garton.html.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gouldner A. W. (1958) Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 2(3) 281–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gourieroux C., Monfort A., Trognon A. (1984) Pseudo maximum-likelihood methods: Applications to Poisson models. Econometrica 52(3) 701–720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H. (1997) Econometric Analysis. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B. (2005) Bridging old worlds and building new ones: Towards a microsociology of creativity. , Thompson L., Choi H.-S., eds. Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 199–216.Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B., Sutton R. I. (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4) 716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1) 153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. (2003) Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy 32(7) 1159–1177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen L. B., Frederiksen L. (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1) 45–63.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen L. B., Lakhani K. R. (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5) 1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen L. B., Laursen K. (2009) The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Res. Policy 38(10) 1582–1589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jetten J., Branscombe N. R., Spears R., McKimmie B. M. (2003) Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1) 130–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jick T. D. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4) 602–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Allen T. J. (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12(1) 7–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinbaum A., Stuart T., Tushman M. (2009) Communication (and coordination?) in a modern, complex organization. . HBS Working Paper 09-004, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Kline S. J., Rosenberg N. (1986) An overview of innovation. , Landau R., Rosenberg N., eds. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) , 275–305.Google Scholar
  • Kollock P. (1999) The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. , Smith M. A., Kollock P., eds. Communities in Cyberspace. (Routledge, London) , 219–239.Google Scholar
  • Koput K. W. (1997) A chaotic model of innovative search: Some answers, many questions. Organ. Sci. 8(5) 528–542.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6) 923–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J. C., Wenger E. C. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (Cambridge University Press, New York) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee G. K., Cole R. E. (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6) 633–649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2) 197–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G. L., Morrison P. D., Searls K., Sonnack M., von Hippel E. (2002) Performance assessment of the lead user generation process for new product development. Management Sci. 48(8) 1042–1059.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2 351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLaughlin N. (2001) Optimal marginality: Innovation and orthodoxy in Fromm's revision of psychoanalysis. Sociol. Quart. 42(2) 271–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menon T., Pfeffer J. (2003) Valuing internal versus external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Sci. 49(4) 497–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. K. (1949) Social Theory and Social Structure. (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) .Google Scholar
  • Merton R. K. (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(1) 9–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Moon J. Y., Sproull L. S. (2008) The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer work force. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4) 494–515.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison P. D., Roberts J. H., Midgley D. F. (2000) Opinion leadership amongst leading edge users. Australian Marketing J. 8(1) 5–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nambisan S., Baron R. A. (2010) Different roles, different strokes: Organizing virtual customer environments to promote two types of customer contributions. Organ. Sci. 21(2) 554–572.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1) 100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1) 187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Mahony S., Bechky B. A. (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration between unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3) 422–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E. (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1) 85–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1) 89–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1) 33–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4) 531–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. (2001) Beyond local research: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4) 287–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. (2005) A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Res. J. 17(2–3) 131–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Shah S. K. (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7) 1000–1014.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shalley C. E., Zhou J., Oldham G. R. (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6) 933–958.Google Scholar
  • Simmel G. (1950) The stranger. , Wolff K. H., ed. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. (Free Press, New York) , 402–408.Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. (1971) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. , Greenberger M., ed. Computers, Communications and the Public Interest. (John Hopkins Press, Baltimore) , 38–52.Google Scholar
  • Tortoriello M., Krackhardt D. (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1) 167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Scanlan T. J. (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2) 289–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., von Hippel E. (1988) Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Sci. 34(5) 569–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Spiro J. (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2) 447–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H. (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sci. 32(5) 590–607.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Maanen J., Barley S. (1984) Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. , Staw B. M., Cummings L. L., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 287–365.Google Scholar
  • von Hippel E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • von Hippel E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G. (2006) Customers demand their slice of IP. Harvard Bus. Rev. (February) 45–46.Google Scholar
  • Wasko M. M., Faraj S. (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1) 35–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber R. P. (1990) Basic Content Analysis. (Sage, London) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B., Salaff J., Dimitrova D., Garton L., Gulia M., Haythornthwaite C. (1996) Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Rev. Sociol. 22 213–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittington K. B., Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. (2009) Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1) 90–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams R. L., Cothrel J. (2000) Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Rev. 41(4) 81–91.Google Scholar
  • Wolfe A. W. (2006) Network perspectives on communities. Structure Dynam.: eJournal Anthropol. Related Sci. 1(4). . http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8184j9bq.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.