The Effect of Going Public on Innovative Productivity and Exploratory Search

References

• Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B. (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4) 678–690.Google Scholar
• AdvaMed (2004) The medical technology industry at a glance 2004. . Report, Advanced Medical Technology Association, Washington, DC. http://advamed.org/NR/rdonlyres/0A261055-827C-4CC6-80B6-CC2D8FA04A33/0/Chartbook-Sept2004.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Lampert C. M. (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6/7) 521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J., Gittelman M. (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4) 774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J., Gittelman M., Sampat B. (2009) Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy 38(2) 415–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison J. R., Lemley M. A., Moore K. A., Trunkey R. D. (2004) Valuable patents. Georgetown Law J. 92(3) 435–479.Google Scholar
• Arora A., Ceccagnoli M., Cohen W. M. (2008) R&D and the patent premium. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(5) 1153–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asker J., Farre-Mensa J., Ljungqvist A. (2011) Does the stock market distort investment incentives?. . Finance Working Paper 282/2010, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P., Ding W., Stuart T. (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4) 637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber J. S., Murphy S. A., Verbitsky N. (2004) Adjusting for time-varying confounding in survival analysis. Sociol. Methodol. 34(1) 163–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J. N., Hannan M. T., Burton M. D. (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4) 960–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J. (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and Internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1) 42–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4) 676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodnar L. M., Davidian M., Siega-Riz A. M., Tsiatis A. A. (2004) Marginal structural models for analyzing causal effects of time-dependent treatments: An application in perinatal epidemiology. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 159(10) 926–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boot A. W. A., Gopalan R., Thakor A. V. (2006) The entrepreneur's choice between private and public ownership. J. Finance 61(2) 803–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brau J. C., Fawcett S. E. (2006) Initial public offerings: An analysis of theory and practice. J. Finance 61(1) 399–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee B. J. (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. 73(3) 305–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee B. J. (2001) Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Res. 18(2) 207–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter R. E., Petersen B. C. (2002) Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. Econom. J. 112(477) F54–F72.Google Scholar
• Certo S. T., Holcomb T. R., Holmes Jr R. M. (2009) IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: Moving the agenda forward. J. Management 35(6) 1340–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T. J., He S., Nandy D. K. (2010) The going-public decision and the product market. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(5) 1855–1908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly B. L., Tiyanhi L., Certo S. T., Hitt M. A. (2010) Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional owners on competitive actions. Acad. Management J. 53(4) 723–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2) 147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G., Lenox M. J. (2005) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5) 615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fewell Z., Hernán M. A., Wolfe F., Tilling K., Choi H., Sterne J. A. C. (2004) Controlling for time-dependent confounding using marginal structural models. Stata J. 4(4) 402–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer H. M., Pollock T. G. (2004) Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 47(4) 463–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M., Kogut B. (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4) 366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Google Inc. (2004) Form 424B4. . Final prospectus, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312504143377/d424b4.htm.Google Scholar
• Gourieroux C., Monfort A., Trognon A. (1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Applications to poisson models. Econometrica 52(3) 701–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves S. B. (1988) Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry. Acad. Management J. 31(2) 417–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. (2007) Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Indust. Corporate Change 16(5) 945–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Lerner J. (2010) The financing of R&D and innovation. , Hall B. H., Rosenberg N., eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1. (North-Holland, Amsterdam) , 609–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. . Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1) 16–38.Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2) 149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen G. S., Hill C. W. L. (1991) Are institutional investors myopic? A time-series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic Management J. 12(1) 1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J., Hall B. H., Griliches Z. (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4) 909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1) 9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernán M. A., Brumback B., Robins J. M. (2001) Marginal structural models to estimate the joint causal effect of nonrandomized treatments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96(454) 440–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu D. H. (2006) Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Sci. 52(2) 204–219.Link, Google Scholar
• International Trade Administration (2010) Medical devices industry assessment. . Report, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/health/Medical%20Device%20Industry%20Assessment%20FINAL%20II%203-24-10.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Fogarty M. S. (2000) Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2) 215–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain B. A., Kini O. (1994) The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. J. Finance 49(5) 1699–1726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain B. A., Kini O. (2000) Does the presence of venture capitalists improve the survival profile of IPO firms? J. Bus. Finance Accounting 27(9/10) 1139–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11) 1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4) 305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6) 1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3) 383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lavie D., Stettner U., Tushman M. L. (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1) 109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2) 95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Mavrinac S. C., Blitz A. (1998) Managing the success of the IPO transformation process. . Working paper, Ernst & Young, London.Google Scholar
• Medical Device Register (2005) Medical Device Register: The Official Directory of Medical Manufacturers. (Canon Communications, Los Angeles, CA) .Google Scholar
• Mikkelson W. H., Partch M. M., Shah K. (1997) Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public. J. Financial Econom. 44(3) 281–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Nerkar A. (2003) Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Sci. 49(2) 211–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Gulati R. (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. 39(5) 1245–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagano M., Panetta F., Zingales L. (1998) Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. J. Finance 53(1) 27–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke L. E., Wooldridge J. M. (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6) 619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Harper & Row, New York) .Google Scholar
• Platzer M. (2007) Patient capital: How venture capital investment drives revolutionary medical innovation. . Report, National Venture Capital Association, Arlington, VA. http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=268&Itemid=103.Google Scholar
• Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5) 631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock T. G., Gulati R. (2007) Standing out from the crowd: The visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organ. 5(4) 339–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins J. M., Hernán M. A., Brumback B. (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11(5) 550–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6) 751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Santos Silva J. M. C., Tenreyro S. (2006) The log of gravity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4) 641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Shane S., Stuart T. (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. 48(1) 154–170.Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T. (2007) XTPQML: Stata module to estimate fixed-effects Poisson (quasi-ML) regression with robust standard errors. . Program code, Boston College, Boston. http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/x/xtpqml.ado.Google Scholar
• Singh J. V. (1986) Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. 29(3) 562–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4) 351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen J. B., Stuart T. E. (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1) 81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E. (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8) 791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1) 21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Sorenson O. (2003) Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2) 315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trostel A. O., Nichols M. L. (1982) Privately-held and publicly-held companies: A comparison of strategic choices and management processes. Acad. Management J. 25(1) 47–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. . Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Section 201 [21 U.S.C. 321]: Chapter II. Accessed June 15, 2007, http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/FDCActChaptersIandIIShortTitleandDefinitions/ucm086297.htm.Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2010) General information concerning patents. . Accessed July 6, 2011, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html.Google Scholar
• von Nordenflycht A. (2007) Is public ownership bad for professional service firms? Ad agency ownership, performance, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 50(2) 429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wadhwa A., Kotha S. (2006) Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Acad. Management J. 49(4) 819–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L. (2009) Ownership, size, and the formal structure of organizations: Evidence from U.S. public and private firms, 1992–2002. Indust. Corporate Change 18(4) 595–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. (1997) Quasi-likelihood methods for count data. , Pesaran M. H., Schmidt P., eds. Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Volume II: Microeconomics. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) , 352–406.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. (1999) Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. J. Econometrics 90(1) 77–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A. (1996) Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Acad. Management J. 39(6) 1713–1735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y., Gimeno J. (2010) Earnings pressure and competitive behavior: Evidence from the U.S. electricity industry. Acad. Management J. 53(4) 743–768.Crossref, Google Scholar