Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0677

References

  • Argyris C., Schön D. A. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. (2003a) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3) 720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. (2003b) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3) 312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V. (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4) 350–372.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5) 875–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary object in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5) 555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9) 1180–1195.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D. N., Brown J. S. (2000) Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. 10(4) 381–400.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton C. D. (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3) 346–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cronin M. A., Weingart L. R. (2007) Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3) 761–773.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dammann O., Kieser A. (2010) Collaboration between specialists in chemical innovation projects: Mechanisms of knowledge integration. Paper presented at the 26th EGOS Colloquium, June, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  • Donnellon A., Gray B., Bougon M. G. (1986) Communication, meaning and organized action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1) 43–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2) 179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (2001) Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. 12(5) 612–631.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D., Tolboom J. N. (2008) Creative organizing to enable organizational creativity. , Zhou J., Shalley C. E., eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 237–262.Google Scholar
  • Drazin R., Kazanjian R. K., Glynn M. (2008) Creativity and sensemaking among professionals. , Zhou J., Shalley C. E., eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) , 263–282.Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2) 350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(2) 128–146.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Nembhard I. M. (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Product Innovation Management 26(2) 123–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4) 685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ewenstein B., Whyte J. (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as “epistemic objects”. Organ. Stud. 30(1) 7–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Xiao Y. (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8) 1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A. (1979) Central Problems of Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. (Macmillan, London) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1) 82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B., Bechky B. A. (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4) 484–500.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Klein K. J. (2007) What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4) 1199–1228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4) 741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karau S. J., Kelly J. R. (1992) The effects of time pressure and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 28(6) 542–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg K. C., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1) 22–44.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly J. R., Jackson J. W., Hutson-Comeaux S. L. (1997) The effects of time pressure and task differences on influence modes and accuracy in decision-making groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(1) 10–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law J., Singleton V. (2005) Object lessons. Organization 12(3) 331–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Lovelace K., Shapiro D. L., Weingart L. R. (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(4) 779–793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1) 14–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Bechky B. A. (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1) 463–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. (2002) Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 370–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Palincsar A. S., Brown A. L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition Instruction 1(2) 117–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer J. T., Milton L. P., Swann W. B. (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2) 296–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rico R., Sánchez-Manzanares M., Gil F., Gibson C. (2008) Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1) 163–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenshine B., Meister C. (1992) The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Ed. Leadership 49(7) 26–33.Google Scholar
  • Schmickl C., Kieser A. (2008) How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations? Res. Policy 37(6–7) 1148–1163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schön D. A. (1993) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. , Ortony A., ed. Metaphor and Thought. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) , 137–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheramata W. A. (2000) Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2) 389–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skilton P. F., Dooley K. J. (2010) The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1) 118–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sole D., Edmondson A. (2002) Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British J. Management 13(S2) S17–S34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3) 387–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6) 941–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker A. L., Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. (2007) Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Sci. 53(6) 894–907.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S. (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. 48(3) 532–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wixted J. T. (2004) The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annual Rev. Psych. 55 235–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood D. J., Bruner J. S., Ross G. (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 17(2) 89–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.