Institutions, Capabilities, and Contracts: Make or Buy in the Electric Utility Industry

References

• Argyres N. (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. 17(2):129–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Mayer KJ. (2007) Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1060–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Zenger T. (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries: A dynamic perspective and integration. Organ. Sci. . ePub ahead of print July 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0736.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigelow LS, Argyres N. (2008) Transaction costs, industry experience and make-or-buy decisions in the population of early U.S. auto firms. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(3–4):791–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH. (1937) The nature of the firm. Econometrica 4(16):386–405.Google Scholar
• Coase R. (1998) The new institutional economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):72–74.Google Scholar
• Conner KR, Prahalad CK. (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7(5):477–501.Link, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Han S.-K. (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. 25(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delios A, Henisz WJ. (2000) Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economics. Acad. Management J. 43(3):305–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H. (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
• Energy Information Association (EIA). (1993) The changing structure of the electric power industry, 1970–1991. . DOE/EIA-0562 (report), Energy Information Association, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Energy Information Association (EIA). (2000) The changing structure of the electric power industry 2000: An update. . Report DOE/EIA-0562(00) (report), Energy Information Association, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Energy Information Association (EIA). (2008) Electric power annual—State data tables. . Report, Energy Information Association, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Fabrizio K. (2005) Electric power. , Nelson RR, ed. The Limits of Market Organization. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 27–47.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE. (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40(12):1720–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ. (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 16(2):334–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Williamson OE. (1999) Comparative economic organization—Within and between countries. Bus. Politics 1(3):261–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirst E, Kirby B. (1999) What is system control? Proc. Amer. Power Conf. , Chicago.Google Scholar
• Holburn GLF, Zelner BA. (2010) Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management J. 31(12):1290–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt S. (2002) Making Competition Work in Electricity. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG. (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow PL. (1988) Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: Empirical evidence. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 4(1):95–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow PL. (1991) The role of transaction cost economics in antitrust and public utility regulatory policies. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 7(Special issue):53–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow PL. (1996) Introducing competition into regulated network industries: From hierarchies to markets in electricity. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):341–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow PL. (2005a) Markets for power in the United States: An interim assessment. . Working Paper 05-20, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Joskow PL. (2005b) Transmission policy in the United States. Utilities Policy 13(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Dyer JH, Singh H. (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. 23(8):747–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U. (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN. (1992) Transaction cost economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change 1(1):99–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ. (2003) An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy B, Spiller PT. (1994) The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 10(2):201–246.Google Scholar
• Lyon TP, Hackett SC. (1993) Bottlenecks and governance structures: Open access and long-term contracting in natural gas. J. Law Econom. Organ. 9(2):380–398.Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Richman BD. (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1). . Article 1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhok A. (2002) Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the new institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 23 535–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Salomon RM. (2006) Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: Integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management J. 49(5):942–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Bigelow L. (2008) New institutional economics, organization, and strategy. , Brousseau E, Glachant JM, eds. New Institutional Economics: A Guidebook. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• North D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE. (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(3):283–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA. (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14 179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MV. (1992) Power plays: Regulation, diversification, and backward integration in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management J. 13(1):13–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sampson RC. (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Shelanki HA, Klein PG. (1995) Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 11(2):335–361.Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1978) Rationality as process and as product of thought. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(2):268–278.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingast BR. (1995) The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 11(1):1–31.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. (1995) The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management J. 16(3):171–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1991) Comparative economics organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (1999) Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1087–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. (2000) The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econom. Literature 38(3):595–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar