Contingency Fit, Institutional Fit, and Firm Performance: A Metafit Approach to Organization–Environment Relationships

References

• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. (1988) Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3) 411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schon D. A. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory in Action Perspective. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) .Google Scholar
• Ashby W. R. (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics. (Chapman & Hall, London) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3) 421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barreto I., Baden-Fuller C. W. F. (2006) To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. J. Management Stud. 43(7) 1559–1581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bate P. (1984) The impact of organizational culture on approaches to organizational problem-solving. Organ. Stud. 5(1) 43–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Oliver C. (1991) Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2) 187–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. 88(3) 588–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Nobel R., Ridderstråle J. (2002) Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organ. Sci. 13(3) 274–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. (1970) A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 35(2) 201–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boiral O. (2003) ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organ. Sci. 14(6) 720–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J. (1980) Performance and consensus. Strategic Management J. 1(3) 227–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briggs S. R., Cheek J. M. (1988) On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(4) 663–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M. (1961) The Management of Innovation. (Tavistock, London) .Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B. (2004) Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. (2002) Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. 48(11) 1461–1485.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. (2003) Erratum: Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. 49(8) 1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Erikson B. H., Håkonsson D. D., Knudsen T., Snow C. C. (2008) Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. (Springer, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Vepsalainen A. (1988) The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management J. 9(S1) 115–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R. (1993) A sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management J. 14(4) 237–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J., Chung L., Davies H. (2003) The performance of cross-border units in China: A test of natural selection, strategic choice and contingency theories. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(3) 242–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark E., Soulsby A. (1995) Transforming former state enterprises in the Czech Republic. Organ. Stud. 16(2) 215–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• D'Aunno T., Sutton R. I., Price R. H. (1991) Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Acad. Management J. 34(3) 636–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A. (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Davis J. P., Eisenhardt K. M., Bingham C. B. (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart 54(3) 413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. L. (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2) 147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Robinson R. B. (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. 5(3) 265–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dill W. R. (1958) Environments as an influence on managerial autonomy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 2(4) 409–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J. (1991) Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. , Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J., eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) , 267–292.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2) 147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev S. D., Carroll G. R. (2003) Size (and competition) among organizations: Modeling scale-based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. 24(6) 541–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (1987) Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: In defense of contingency theory. J. Management Stud. 24(1) 1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (2008a) Resolving the conflict between contingency and institutional theories of organizational design. , Burton R. M., Erikson B. H., Håkonsson D. D., Knudsen T., Snow C. C., eds. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. (Springer, New York) , 21–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (2008b) The conflict between contingency and institutional theories of organizational design. , Burton R. M., Erikson B. H., Håkonsson D. D., Knudsen T., Snow C. C., eds. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. (Springer, New York) , 3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. (1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(4) 514–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B. (1972) Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(3) 313–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emery F. E., Trist E. (1965) The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18(1) 21–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fines C. H. (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. (Perseus, Reading, MA) .Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1) 39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick W. H. (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3) 601–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greening D. W., Gray B. (1994) Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Acad. Management J. 37(3) 467–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4) 1022–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4) 501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta P. P., Dirsmith M. W., Fogarty T. J. (1994) Coordination and control in a government agency—Contingency and institutional theory perspectives on GAO audits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2) 264–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.) Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. (1983) Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Acad. Management J. 26(1) 5–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Miner A. S. (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3) 472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heugens P. M. A. R., Lander M. W. (2009) Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Acad. Management J. 52(1) 61–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hickson D. J., Pugh D. S., Pheysey D. C. (1969) Operations technology and organization structure: An empirical reappraisal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(3) 378–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill T. (1983) Production/Operations Management: Text and Cases. (Prentice Hall, New York) .Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Bierman L., Shimizu K., Kochhar R. (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1) 13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofer C. W. (1975) Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Acad. Management J. 18(4) 784–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G., Neuijen B., Ohayv D. D., Sanders G. (1990) Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2) 286–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hrebiniak L. G., Joyce W. F. (1985) Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(3) 336–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. (1993) rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2) 306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Kohli A. K. (1993) Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing 57(3) 53–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones A. P., Johnson L. A., Butler M. C., Main D. S. (1983) Apples and oranges: An empirical comparison of commonly used indices of interrater agreement. Acad. Management J. 26(3) 507–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kondra A. Z., Hinings C. R. (1998) Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organ. Stud. 19(5) 743–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. J. (1996) Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(5) 812–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. (1967) Organization and Environment. (Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston) .Google Scholar
• Lee J., Miller D. (1996) Strategy, environment and performance in two technological contexts: Contingency theory in Korea. Organ. Stud. 17(5) 729–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. (1991) Organizational adaptation and environmental selection—Interrelated processes of change. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 140–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Volberda H. W. (1999) Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5) 519–534.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindell M. K., Brandt C. J. (2000) Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3) 331–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. (1981) Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4) 563–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2) 340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S., Narayanan V. K. (2007) Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management J. 28(3) 243–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. (1967) Psychometric Theory. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
• Orru M., Biggart N. W., Hamilton G. G. (1991) Organizational isomorphism in East Asia. , Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J., eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) , 361–389.Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9) 833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker S. C., van Witteloostuijn A. (2010) A general framework for estimating multidimensional contingency fit. Organ. Sci. 21(2) 540–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Pennings J. M. (1987) Structural contingency theory: A multivariate test. Organ. Stud. 8(3) 223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(2) 194–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4) 531–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Priem R. L. (1994) Executive judgment, organizational congruence, and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 5(3) 421–437.Link, Google Scholar
• Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Macdonald K. M., Turner C., Lupton T. (1963) A conceptual scheme for organizational analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 8(3) 289–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth K., Morrison A. J. (1992) Business-level competitive strategy: A contingency link to internationalization. J. Management 18(3) 473–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. (2003) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. (2001) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1) 125–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Guthrie J. P., Chen M.-J. (1989) Strategy, size and performance. Organ. Stud. 10(1) 63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1) 22–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. (1996) The institutionalization of the institutional field. , Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Nord W. R., eds. Handbook of Organization Studies. (Sage, London) , 175–190.Google Scholar
• Tosi H. L., Slocum J. W. (1984) Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. J. Management 10(1) 9–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H. (1979) Review of Organizations and Environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2) 320–326.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Drazin R. (1985) The concept of fit in contingency theory. , Staw B. M., Cummings L. L., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 333–365.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L. (1980) Measuring and Assessing Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. (1989) Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci. 35(8) 942–962.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Prescott J. E. (1990) Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management J. 11(1) 1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W. (1996) Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. 7(4) 359–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W. (1998) Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W., Lewin A. Y. (2003) Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. J. Management Stud. 40(8) 2111–2136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W., Foss N. J., Lyles M. A. (2010) Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4) 931–951.Link, Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy L. (1951) General system theory: A new approach to unity of science. Human Biol. 23(4) 303–361.Google Scholar
• Washington M., Ventresca M. J. (2004) How organizations change: The role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organ. Sci. 15(1) 82–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Random House, New York) .Google Scholar
• Wicks D. (2001) Institutionalized mindsets of invulnerability: Differentiated institutional fields and the antecedents of organizational crisis. Organ. Stud. 22(4) 659–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams C. (2008) Comparing evolutionary and contingency theory approaches to organizational structure. , Burton R. M., Erikson B. H., Håkonsson D. D., Knudsen T., Snow C. C., eds. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. (Springer, New York) , 41–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodward J. (1965) Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. (Oxford University Press, London) .Google Scholar
• Zajac E. J., Kraatz M. S., Bresser R. K. F. (2000) Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. 21(4) 429–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml V. A., Varadarajan P. R., Zeithaml C. P. (1988) The contingency approach: Its foundations and relevance to theory building and research in marketing. Eur. J. Marketing 22(7) 37–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G. (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42(5) 726–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G. (1987) Institutional theories of organization. Annual Rev. Sociol. 13 443–464.Crossref, Google Scholar