Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0688

References

  • Allen T. J., Cohen S. I. (1969) Information flow in research and development laboratories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(1) 12–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4) 634–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anjos F., Reagans R. (2012) Commitment, learning and alliance performance: A formal analysis using an agent-based network formation model. J. Math. Sociol. . Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Argote L. (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4) 571–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Liu C. C., Stuart T. E. (2011) Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. . HBS Working Paper 09-136, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., McEvily B., Rowley T. J. (2012) Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 529–546.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3) 312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Brandes U., Fleischer D. (2005) Centrality measures based on current flow. , Diekert V., Durand B., eds. Proc. 22nd Symp. Theoret. Aspects Comput. Sci. (STACS 2005), Vol. 3404 . Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) , 533–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5) 555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1) 128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement) S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Cross R., Nohria N., Parker A. (2002) Six myths about informal networks—And how to overcome them. Sloan Management Rev. 43(3) 67–76.Google Scholar
  • Crozier M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. (Tavistock Publications, London) .Google Scholar
  • Cummings J. L., Teng B.-S. (2003) Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 20(1–2) 39–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2) 179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Benassi M. (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11(2) 183–196.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Ertug G., Galunic C. (2009) The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2) 299–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. V. (1991) Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56(6) 716–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. V., Fernandez R. M. (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Soc. Methodol. 19 89–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6) 1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1) 82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4) 716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H., Kilduff M., Tsai W. (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 359–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1) 56–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Allen T. J. (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrom: A look at performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12(1) 7–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Tushman M. (1982) An investigation into the managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R&D facility. R&D Management 11(3) 103–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1987) QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Soc. Networks 9 171–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1988) Predicting with networks: A multiple regression approach to analyzing dyadic data. Soc. Networks 10 359–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. , Andrews S. B., Knoke D., eds. Networks In and Around Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 16. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 183–210.Google Scholar
  • Laumann E. O., Marsden P. V., Prensky D. (1983) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. , Burt R. S., Minor M. J., eds. Applied Network Analysis. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) , 18–34.Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Burton D. (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1) 91–103.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E. (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1) 85–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6) 1320–1350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R. (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4) 835–849.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. (2008) Contradictory or compatible? Reconsidering the “trade-off” between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing. , Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., eds. Network Strategy: Advances in Strategy Management, Vol. 25. (Emerald Publishing Group, Bingley, UK) , 275–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4) 502–517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R. E., Zuckerman E. W. (2008) All in the family: Reply to Burt, Podolny, and van de Rijt, Ban, and Sarkar. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5) 979–999.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reason J. (2008) The Human Condition: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. (Ashgate Publishing, Surrey, UK) .Google Scholar
  • Seidel V., O'Mahony S. (2010) Translating novel concepts to novel products: Coordination totems in practice. . Working paper, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  • Sgourev S. V, Zuckerman E. W. (2011) Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network. Rationality Soc. 23(1) 3–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 125–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simpson W. (2001) The quadratic assignment procedure (QAP). North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2001 , StataCorp, College Station, TX. . Paper 1.2. http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:asug01:1.2.Google Scholar
  • Smith S. S. (2005) “Don't put my name on it”: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1) 1–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith E. B., Menon T., Thompson L. (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1) 67–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stephenson K., Zelen M. (1989) Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Soc. Networks 11(1) 1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(1) 27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M., Krackhardt D. (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1) 167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Katz R. (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeeper. Management Sci. 26(11) 1071–1085.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Scanlan T. J. (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2) 289–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance or organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu L., Waber B., Aral S., Brynjolfsson E. (2011) Water cooler networks: Performance implications of informal face-to-face interaction structures in information intensive work. . Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.