Changing Organizational Designs and Performance Frontiers

References

• Adler P. S., Borys B. (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1) 61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aigner D., Lovell C. A. K., Schmidt P. (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econom. 6(1) 21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Meyer A., Eisenhardt K., Carley K., Pettigrew A. (1999) Introduction to the special issue: Applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organ. Sci. 10(3) 233–236.Link, Google Scholar
• Astley W. G., Van de Ven A. H. (1983) Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2) 245–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Charnes A., Cooper W. W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. 30(9) 1078–1092.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Swarts J., Thomas D. A. (1989) An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses. , Chan J. L., Patton J. M., eds. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 5. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 125–163.Google Scholar
• Barnett W. P., Sorenson O. (2002) The red queen in organizational creation and development. Indust. Corporate Change 11(2) 289–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J. (2008) Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. , Rugman A. M., Brewer T. L., eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Business, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) , 380–401.Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D. (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J., eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) , 349–381.Google Scholar
• Bluedorn A. C. (1993) Pilgrim's progress: Trends and convergence in research on organization size and environments. J. Management 19(2) 163–191.Google Scholar
• Bryce C. L., Engberg J. B., Wholey D. R. (2000) Comparing the agreement among alternative models in evaluating HMO efficiency. Health Services Res. 35(2) 509–528.Google Scholar
• Camisón-Zornoza C., Lapiedra-Alcamí R., Segarra-Ciprés M., Boronat-Navarro M. (2004) A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organ. Stud. 25(3) 331–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W. (1962) Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 9(3–4) 181–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6) 429–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. M. (1994) Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J. (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1) 1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J. (1975) Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance—Part II. A contingency analysis. J. Management Stud. 12(1–2) 12–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J. (2005) Organization: Contemporary Principles and Practice. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
• Chilingerian J. A. (1995) Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: A multivariate analysis of best practices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80(3) 548–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chilingerian J. A., Sherman H. D. (1996) Benchmarking physician practice patterns with DEA: A multi-stage approach for cost containment. Ann. Oper. Res. 67(1) 83–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper W. W., Sinha K. K., Sullivan R. S. (1996) Evaluating the information content of a measure of plant output: An application to high technology manufacturing. Ann. Oper. Res. 68(3) 329–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cullen J. B., Baker D. D. (1984) Administrative size and organization size: An examination of the lag structure. Acad. Management J. 27(3) 644–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf R. (1979) Life Chances: Approaches to Social and Political Theory. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
• Derfus P., Maggitti P., Grimm C. M., Smith K. G. (2008) The red queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 51(1) 61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (1999) Performance-Driven Organizational Change: The Organizational Portfolio. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dooms E., van Oijen A. A. (2008) The balance between tailoring and standardizing control. Eur. Management Rev. 5(4) 245–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. (1993) Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. 36(6) 1196–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz Y. L., Prahalad C. K. (1991) Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management J. 12(S1) 145–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. (1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(4) 514–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durkheim E. (1964) The Division of Labor in Society. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Egelhoff W. G. (1988) Organizing the Multinational Enterprise: An Information-Processing Perspective. (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Elton E. J., Gruber M. J. (1997) Modern portfolio theory, 1950 to date. J. Banking Finance 21(11–12) 1743–1759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R., Grosskopf S., Norris M., Zhang Z. (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(1) 66–83.Google Scholar
• Filley A. C., House R. J., Kerr S. (1976) Managerial Process and Organizational Behavior. (Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL) .Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R. (1977) Organization Design. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) .Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Nohria N. (1989) Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 10(4) 323–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) .Google Scholar
• Gollier C. (2001) The Economics of Risk and Time. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouldner A. W. (1954) Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Gupta A., Govindarajan V. (1991) Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(4) 768–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5) 929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. (1989) Organizational Ecology. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans G. C. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York) .Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1) 85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayanthi S., Kocha B., Sinha K. K. (1999) Competitive analysis of manufacturing plants: An application to the U.S. processed food industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 118(2) 217–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson P. E., Veazie P. J., O'Connor P. J., Potthoff S. J., Kochevar L., Verma D., Dutta P. (2002) Understanding variation in chronic disease outcomes. Health Care Management Sci. 5(3) 175–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A. (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khandwalla P. N. (1973) The effect of competition on the structure of top management control. Acad. Management J. 16(2) 285–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R. (1976) Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(4) 571–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1) 1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7) 934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., Warglien M. (1999) Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. 10(3) 342–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Minton J. W. (1986) Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Sci. 32(5) 514–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin J. (1992) Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. (1993) Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. 36(6) 1175–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. (1999) Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: Strategies for rugged landscapes. Organ. Sci. 10(3) 294–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1995) Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2/3) 179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. (1993) Some organizational consequences of CEO succession. Acad. Management J. 36(3) 644–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L. (1999) The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organ. Dynam. 28(1) 45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. (2008) What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Res. Policy 37(1) 1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Sampat B. N. (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 44(1) 31–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Ghoshal S. (1994) Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management J. 15(6) 491–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norman D. A. (1988) The Design of Everyday Things. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Harper & Row, New York) .Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Doz Y. L. (1987) The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Pratten C. F. (1976) Labor Productivity Differentials Within International Companies. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .Google Scholar
• Salinas-Jiménez J., Smith P. (1996) Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care. Ann. Oper. Res. 67(1) 141–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4) 838–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G. (1955) Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations. (Free Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Sinha K. K. (1996) Moving frontier analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis for competitive analysis of a high-technology manufacturing plant. Ann. Oper. Res. 66(3) 197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha K. K., Van de Ven A. H. (2005) Designing work within and between organizations. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 389–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. L. (1965) Social structure and organizations. , March J. G., ed. Handbook of Organizations. (Rand-McNally, Chicago) , 153–193.Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis E. (2001) Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
• Tosi H., Patt H. (1967) Administrative ratios and organizational size. Acad. Management J. 10(2) 161–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L. (1980) Measuring and Assessing Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Polley D. E., Garud R., Venkataraman V. (1999) The Innovation Journey. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Virany B., Tushman M. L., Romanelli E. (1992) Executive succession and organizational outcomes in turbulent environments: An organizational learning approach. Organ. Sci. 3(1) 72–91.Link, Google Scholar
• Walker A. H., Lorsch J. W. (1968) Organizational choice: Product vs. function. Harvard Bus. Rev. 46(6) 129–138.Google Scholar
• Whittington R., Pettigrew A. M. (2003) Complementarities thinking. , Pettigrew A. M., Whittington R., Melin L., Sanchez-Runde C., van den Bosch F. A. J., Ruigrok W., Numagomi T., eds. Innovative Forms of Organizing. (Sage, London) , 125–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wholey D. R., Bryce C. L. (1997) The evolution of HMO efficiency, 1985–1994. Presentation, INFORMS Annual Meeting, May 6, (INFORMS, Hanover, MD) .Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn M., Gibson C. (2006) Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(3) 501–518.Crossref, Google Scholar