The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0695

References

  • Ahuja G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3) 425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. (2007) Three reviews: Network resources, social capital, and digital utopianism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3) 476–481.Google Scholar
  • Ahuja G., Polidoro F. , Mitchell W. (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management J. 30(9) 941–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Van Alstyne M. W. (2011) Networks, information and brokerage: The diversity-bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. . Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J. (2008) Introduction: Evolving webs in network economies. Network Strategy: Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , xiii–xxxii.Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., McEvily B., Rowley T. J. (2012) Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 529–546.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell G. G., Zaheer A. (2007) Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organ. Sci. 18(6) 955–972.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1994) Structural Contexts of Opportunities. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks 21(4) 375–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 795–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breiger R. L. (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53(2) 181–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2002) Bridge decay. Soc. Networks 24(4) 333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buskens V., van de Rijt A. (2008) Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(2) 371–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement) S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Dixit A. (2009) Governance institutions and economic activity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1) 5–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M., Goodwin J. (1994) Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6) 1411–1454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M., Mische A. (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4) 962–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld S. L. (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5) 1015–1035.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld S. L. (1997) Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Soc. Networks 19(1) 91–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L., Schachter S., Back K. (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaskiewicz J. (1985) Interorganizational relations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 11 281–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. (University of California Press, Berkeley) .Google Scholar
  • Gomes-Casseres B. (1994) Group vs. group: How alliance networks compete. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(4) 62–74.Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6) 1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1995) Social structure and alliance formation pattern: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4) 619–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439–1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M., Tatarynowicz A. (2012) The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 449–471.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4) 716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider F. (1946) Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psych. 21 107–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson M. O. (2008) Social and Economic Networks. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson M. O., Rogers B. W. (2007) Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks? Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3) 890–915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Dyer J. H., Singh H. (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. 23(8) 747–767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Singh H., Perlmutter H. (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 217–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Brass D. J. (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4 317–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim T.-Y., Oh H., Swaminathan A. (2006) Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3) 704–720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. , Nohria N., Eccles R. G., eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) , 216–239.Google Scholar
  • Leik R. K., Chalkley M. A. (1997) On the stability of network relations under stress. Soc. Networks 19(1) 63–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S. X., Rowley T. J. (2002) Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. 45(6) 1104–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N. (1999) Building a theory of social capital. Connections 22(1) 28–51.Google Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Hanada M., Olson J. (1981) Cultural orientation and individual reactions to organizations: A study of employees of japanese-owned firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(1) 93–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madhavan R., Koka B. R., Prescott J. E. (1998) Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management J. 19(5) 439–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mariotti F., Delbridge R. (2012) Overcoming network overload and redundancy in interorganizational networks: The roles of potential and latent ties. Organ Sci. 23(2) 511–528.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Jaffee J., Tortoriello M. (2012) Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 547–563.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27 415–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. J. (2001) The social networks of high and low self- monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1) 121–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S. (1989) Similarity of political behavior among large american corporations. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(2) 401–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mouw T. (2006) Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of recent research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32 79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2) 242–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N., Eccles R. G. (1992) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Oliver C. (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2) 241–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Harper & Row, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4) 829–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polidoro F., Ahuja G., Mitchell W. G. (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1) 203–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic social action. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6) 1320–1350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Packalen K., Whittington K. (2012) Organizational and institutional genesis: The emergence of high-tech clusters in the life sciences. , Padgett J., Powell W. W., eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, . Chapter 13. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) .Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., White D. R., Owen-Smith J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4) 1132–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4) 502–517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivera M. T., Soderstrom S. B., Uzzi B. (2010) Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36 91–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. (2000) Redundant governance structure: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salancik G. R. (1995) WANTED: A good network theory of organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2) 345–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. (2005) A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Res. J. 17(2–3) 131–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7) 1113–1126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schulte M., Cohen N. A., Klein K. J. (2012) The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 564–581.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell W. H. (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1) 1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A. V., Li S. X. (2012) The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 472–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soda G., Usai A. (1999) The dark side of dense networks: From embeddedness to indebtedness. , Grandori A., ed. Interfirm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness. (Routledge, London) , 276–302.Google Scholar
  • Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 893–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suitor J. J., Keeton S. (1997) Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women's support networks across a decade. Soc. Networks 19(1) 51–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sydow J., Windeler A. (1998) Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 9(3) 265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Guimera R., Spiro J. (2005) Emergence: The dynamics of network formation. . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Varella P., Javidan M., Waldman D. A. (2012) A model of instrumental networks: The roles of socialized charismatic leadership and group behavior. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 582–595.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B. (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs' networking style and initiation of economic change. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 492–510.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ. Sci. 8(2) 109–125.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J. (2004) The “new” science of networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 30 243–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684) 440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. (1992) Agency as control in formal networks. , Nohria N., Eccles R. G., eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) , 92–117.Google Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Soda G. (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1) 1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Usai A. (2004) The social network approach in strategy research: Theoretical challenges and methodological issues. , Ketchen D. J., Bergh D. D., eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 1. (Elsevier, Amsterdam) , 67–86.Google Scholar
  • Zaheer S., Albert S., Zaheer A. (1999) Time scales and organizational theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4) 725–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Gözübüyük R., Milanov H. (2010) It's the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(1) 62–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.