Digital Science and Knowledge Boundaries in Complex Innovation

References

• Barley SR. (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry A. (2005) Pharmaceutical matters: The invention of informed materials. Theory, Culture Soc. 22(1):51–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA. (2003) Sharing meaning across organizational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Boisot M, McKelvey B. (2010) Integrating modernist and post-modernist perspectives in organizations: A complexity science bridge. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):415–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns LR. ed. (2005) The Business of Healthcare Innovation. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J. (2011) The human genome, a decade later. Tech. Rev. 114(1):40–56.Google Scholar
• Cooper RG. (1998) Product Leadership: Creating and Launching Superior New Products. (Perseus Books, Reading MA).Google Scholar
• Dodgson M, Gann DM, Salter A. (2007) “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ. Sci. 18(5):849–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. (2002) Grounded theory research methods. , Baum JAC, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. (Blackwell, London), 849–866.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D. (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandori A. (2010) A rational heuristic model of economic decision making. Rationality Soc. 22(4):477–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana A, Rosenthal SR. (1997) Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 38(2):103–120.Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E. (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luther M. (2009) Opportunities at the public-private interface. Presentation, 5th Annual BioSciences Forum, October 30 , North Carolina State University, Research Triangle Park.Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Logan D, McCurdy R, Kirchmer M. (2006) Four keys to managing emergence. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 27(2):14–18.Google Scholar
• March JG. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Ng R. (2004) Drugs: From Discovery to Approval. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nightingale P. (1998) A cognitive model of innovation. Res. Policy 27(7):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northrup J. (2005) The pharmaceutical sector. , Burns LR, ed. The Business of Healthcare Innovation. (Cambridge University Press, New York), 27–102.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ. (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Patwardhan B, Vaidya ADB, Chorghade M, Joshi SP. (2008) Reverse pharmacology and systems approaches for drug discovery and development. Curr. Bioactive Compounds 4(4):201–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickering A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peirce C. (1935) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5. Edited by , Hartshorne C, Weiss P. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pisano GP. (2006) Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sammut SM. (2005) Biotechnology business and revenue models: The dynamic of technological evolution and capital market ingenuity. , Burns LR, ed. The Business of Healthcare Innovation. (Cambridge University Press, New York), 190–222.Google Scholar
• Sennett R. (2008) The Craftsman. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1977) Models of Discovery and Other Topics in the Methods of Science. (D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, Holland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Singer E. (2009) Interpreting the genome. Tech. Rev. 112(1):48–53.Google Scholar
• Snowden DJ, Boone ME. (2007) A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(11):68–76.Google Scholar
• Southan C, Cameron G. (2009) Beyond the tsunami: Developing the infrastructure to deal with life sciences data. , Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K, eds. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. (Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA), 117–123.Google Scholar
• Strauss AL. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Suchman L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Turro NJ. (1986) Geometric and topological thinking in organic chemistry. Angew. Chem. Internat. Ed. 25(10):882–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD. (2000) Product Design and Development. (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2004) Innovation or stagnation: Challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products. . Report, U.S. Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S. (1999) The Innovation Journey. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wishart DS. (2008) Applications of metabolomics in drug discovery and development. Drug R&D 9(5):307–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang DJ, Kim EE. (2008) Imaging science and technology in drug discovery. Current Medical Imaging Rev. 4(1):1–1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. (2010a) The new organizing logics of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Lyytinen KJ, Boland RJ, Berente N. (2010b) The next wave of digital innovation: Opportunities and challenges, A report on the research workshop "Digital challenges in innovation research.". . Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1622170.Google Scholar