The Lure of the Virtual

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0703

References

  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Chong J. (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR. (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(3):404–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black M. (1962) Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boh WF, Ren Y, Kiesler S, Bussjaeger R. (2007) Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organization. Organ. Sci. 18(4):595–612.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaminade C, Vang J. (2008) Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation policy: Supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Res. Policy 37(10):1684–1696.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooley M. (1980) Architect or Bee? The Human/Technology Relationship. (South End Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Cramton CD. (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csordas TJ. (2001) Computerized cadavers: Shades of representation and being in virtual reality. , Brodwin PP, ed. Biotechnology and Culture: Bodies, Anxieties, Ethics. (Indiana University Press, Bloomington), 173–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunningham J. (2007) Simulation makes big savings. Professional Engrg. 20(21):39–40.Google Scholar
  • Dodgson M, Gann DM, Salter A. (2007) “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ. Sci. 18(5):849–864.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drew C. (2009) Drones are weapons of choice in fighting Qaeda. New York Times (March 17):A1.Google Scholar
  • Eco U. (1979) A Theory of Semiotics. (University of Indiana Press, Bloomington).Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Sproull L. (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frege G. (1892/1980) On sense and reference. , Geach P, Black M, eds. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 25–50.Google Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Gibbs JL. (2006) Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):451–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith TL, Sawyer JE, Neale MA. (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. 27(2):265–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handy C. (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(3):40–50.Google Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Bailey DE. (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschhorn L. (1984) Beyond Mechanization. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Iacono S, Weisband S. (1997) Developing trust in virtual teams. Proc. 30th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA), 412–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE. (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10(6):791–815.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y. (2002) Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 11(3–4):187–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kincaid JP, Donovan J, Pettitt B. (2003) Simulation techniques for training emergency response. Internat. J. Emergency Management 1(3):238–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurowski PM. (2008) Expecting too much from FEA. Machine Design (July 10):89–93.Google Scholar
  • Levina N, Vaast E. (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longridge T, Bürki-Cohen J, Go TH, Kendra AJ. (2001) Simulator fidelity considerations for training and evaluation of today's airline pilots. Proc. 11th Internat. Sympos. Aviation Psych., (Ohio State University, Columbus).Google Scholar
  • Macedonia M. (2002) Games soldiers play. IEEE Spectrum 39(3):32–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie D. (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Marescaux J, Rubino F. (2004) Robot-assisted remote surgery: Technological advances, potential complications, and solutions. Surgery Tech. Internat. 12 23–26.Google Scholar
  • Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM. (2000) Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5):473–492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Metiu A. (2006) Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organ. Sci. 17(4):418–435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB. (1979) Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):590–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
  • Noble DE. (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Peirce CS. (1932) Elements of Logic: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2. Edited by , Hartshorne C, Weiss P (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Perrow C. (1983) The organizational context of human factors engineering. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(4):521–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. (1999) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, revised ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Prentice R. (2005) The anatomy of a surgical simulation: The mutual articulation of bodies in and through the machine. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35(6):837–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quine WVO. (1961) From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Satava RM. (1995) Virtual reality and telepresence for military medicine. Comput. Biol. Medicine 25(2):229–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saussure Fd. (1916/1966) Course in General Linguistics. Edited by , Bally C, Sechehaye A. . Translated by R. Harris. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  • Shackley S, Wynne B. (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci. Tech. Human Values 21(3):275–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaiken H. (1984) Work Transformed: Automation and Labor in the Computer Age. (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sole D, Edmondson A. (2002) Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British J. Management 13(S2):S17–S34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L, Kiesler S. (1991) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Susman GI, Chase RB. (1986) A sociotechnical analysis of the integrated factory. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 22(3):257–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke SH. (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Thompson JD. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Thornton J. (2010) The question of credibility. Mech. Engrg. 132(5):40–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tschang FT. (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turkle S. (2009) Simulation and Its Discontents. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vallas SP, Beck JP. (1996) The transformation of work revisited: The limits of flexibility in American manufacturing. Soc. Problems 43(3):339–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R. (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):145–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K. (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organ. Sci. 17(2):215–229.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S. (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.