Golfing Alone? Corporations, Elites, and Nonprofit Growth in 100 American Communities

References

• Abzug R. (2007). Wishful thinking about nonprofits. Society 44(3):45–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abzug R, Simonoff JS. (2004). Nonprofit Trusteeship in Different Contexts. (Ashgate, Hants, UK).Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Freeman JH, Reynolds PD. (2006). Organizational foundings in community context: Instruments manufacturers and their interrelationship with other organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):381–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avi-Yonah RS. (2005). The cyclical transformations of the corporate form: A historical perspective on corporate social responsibility. Delaware J. Corporate Law 30(3):767–818.Google Scholar
• Barman E. (2007). An institutional approach to donor control: From dyadic ties to a field-level analysis. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1416–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle AA. (1931). Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Rev. 44(7):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielefeld W, Corbin JJ. (1996). The institutionalization of nonprofit human service delivery: The role of political culture. Admin. Soc. 28(3):362–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boris ET, Steuerle CE. (2006). Scope and dimensions of the nonprofit sector. , Powell WW, Steinberg R, eds. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), 66–88.Google Scholar
• Burris V. (1987). The political partisanship of American business: A study of corporate political action committees. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(6):732–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy. (2008). Giving in Numbers: 2008 Edition. (CECP, New York).Google Scholar
• Corbin JJ. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 28(3):296–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF. (2010). Do theories of organizations progress? Organ. Res. Methods 13(4):690–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Greve HR. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Diekmann KA, Tinsley CH. (1994). The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 59(4):547–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodd EM. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Rev. 45(7):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. (1986). Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. , Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 267–292.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Anheier HK. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16 137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48 147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domhoff GW. (1967). Who Rules America? (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Elazar DJ. (1984). American Federalism: A View from the States, 3rd ed. (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Elkington J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. (New Society Publishers, Stony Creek, CT).Google Scholar
• Florida RL. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Freeman JH, Audia PG. (2006). Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32 145–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frumkin P. (2002). On Being Nonprofit: A Conceptual and Policy Primer. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J. (1985). Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy: A Study of Business Philanthropy and Nonprofit Organizations. (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J. (1991). Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. , Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 293–310.Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J, Bielefeld W, Dowell M. (2006). Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):337–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA. (2008). Configuring the field of play: How hosting the olympic games impacts civic community. J. Management Stud. 45(6):1117–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Guthrie D. (2003). Codebook for Corporate-Community Relations Study: 2001–2002 survey of Corporate Involvement. (Social Science Research Council, New York).Google Scholar
• Hall PD. (1987). An overview of the nonprofit sector: A historical overview of the private nonprofit sector. , Powell WW, ed. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), 3–26.Google Scholar
• Hall PD. (1992). Cultures of trusteeship. , Hall PD, ed. Inventing the Nonprofit Sector and Other Essays on Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Nonprofit Organizations. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore), 135–206.Google Scholar
• Heilbrun J, Gray CM. (2001). The Economics of Art and Culture, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings CR, Greenwood R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):411–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch PM. (1987). Pack Your Own Parachute: How to Survive Mergers, Takeovers, and Other Corporate Disasters. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Hoffman A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management Rev. 42(4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter F. (1953). Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision-Makers. (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill).Google Scholar
• Jensen MC. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Bus. Ethics Quart. 12(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaysen C. (1957). The social significance of the modern corporation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 47(2):311–319.Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, Greenberg DF. (1981). Linear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change. (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kono C, Palmer D, Friedland R, Zafonte M. (1998). Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):863–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laumann EO, Galaskiewicz J, Marsden PV. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Rev. Sociol. 4 455–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litwak E, Hylton LF. (1962). Interorganizational analysis: A hypothesis on co-ordinating agencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 6(4):395–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C. (2003). The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):655–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Battilana J. (2009). Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29 283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M. (2007). Vive la resistance: Consolidation and community-level professional counter-mobilization in U.S. banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R. , eds. (2011). Communities and Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 33. (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElroy KM, Siegfried JJ. (1986). The community influence on corporate contributions. Public Finance Rev. 14(4):394–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM, Ramirez FO. (1997). World society and the nation-state. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1):144–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michels R. (1962). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. (Collier Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Mills CW. (1956). The Power Elite. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS. (1989). Similarity of political behavior among large american corporations. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Rev. Sociol. 22 271–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nader L. (1991). Review: Charity begins at home: Generosity and self-interest among the philanthropic elite. Amer. Anthropol. 93(2):483–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nocera J. (2007). Emerald City of giving does exist. New York Times (December 22). . http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/22/business/22nocera.html.Google Scholar
• Odendahl TJ. (1990). Charity Begins at Home: Generosity and Self-Interest Among the Philanthropic Elite. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Ostrander SA. (1984). Women of the Upper Class. (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Ostrower F. (1995). Why the Wealthy Give: The Culture of Elite Philanthropy. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ostrower F. (2002). Trustees of Culture: Power, Wealth, and Status on Elite Arts Boards. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Plaut VC, Markus HR, Lachman ME. (2002). Place matters: Consensual features and regional variation in American well-being and self. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(1):160–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Steinberg R. (2006). The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of the American Community. (Simon & Schuster, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robertson R, Khondker HH. (1998). Discourses of globalization: Preliminary considerations. Internat. Sociol. 13(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salamon LM. (1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. , Powell WW, ed. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), 99–117.Google Scholar
• Salamon LM, Sokolowski SW. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: New insights from QCEW data. Monthly Labor Rev. 128(9):19–26.Google Scholar
• Saxenian AL. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR, Ruef M, Mendel PJ, Caronna CA. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Smith SR, Lipsky M. (1993). Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Audia PG. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorge A. (2005). The Global and the Local: Understanding the Dialectics of Business Systems. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern RN, Barley SR. (1996). Organizations and social systems: Organization theory's neglected mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):146–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talcott S. (2005). Gillette merger opens wounds, possibilities. Boston Globe (January 30). . http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2005/01/30/gillette_merger_opens_wounds_possibilities/.Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1906). Census of Manufactures: 1905. Edited by Steuart WM, eds. (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. . Retrieved November 23, 2007, http://www.census.gov/population/metro/.Google Scholar
• Useem M. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions. Calif. Management Rev. 30(2):77–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogus T, Davis GF. (2005). Elite mobilizations for antitakeover legislation, 1982–1990. , Davis GF, McAdam D, Scott WR, Zald M, eds. Social Movements and Organizational Theory. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 208–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren RL. (1967). The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(3):396–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, 1st paperback ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Weisbrod BA. (1998). The nonprofit mission and its financing: Growing links between nonprofits and the rest of the economy. , Weisbrod BA, ed. To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar