The Coevolution of Industries and Important Features of Their Environments

References

• Aldrich HE. (1979). Organizations and Environments. (Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Andrews KR. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. (Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.) Google Scholar
• Baum JAC. (1999). Whole-part coevoutionary competition in organizations. , Baum JAC, McKelvey B, eds. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 113–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer JH. (1959). The Emergence of the German Dye Industry. (University of Illinois Press, Urbana).Google Scholar
• Boig FS, Howerton PW. (1952). History and development of organic chemistry: 1877–1949. Science 115(2976):25–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bud RF, Roberts GK. (1984). Science versus Practise: Chemistry in Victorian Britain. (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):325–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems 14(1):69–85.Google Scholar
• Campbell DT. (1974a). Evolutionary epistemology. , Schilpp PA, ed. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. (Open Court, La Salle, IL), 413–463.Google Scholar
• Campbell DT. (1974b). Unjustified variation and selective retention in scientific discovery. , Ayala FJ, Dobzhansky TG, eds. Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems. (University of California Press, Berkeley), 139–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT. (1987). Selection theory and the sociology of scientific validity. , Callebaut W, Pinxten R, eds. Evolutionary Epistemology: A Multiparadigm Program with a Complete Evolutionary Epistemology Bibliography. (Reidel, Boston), 139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Paller BT. (1989). Extending evolutionary epistemology to "justifying" scientific beliefs (a sociological rapprochement with a fallibilist perceptual foundationalism?). , Hahlweg K, Hooker CA, eds. Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology. SUNY Series in Philosophy and Biology. (State University of New York Press, Albany), 231–257.Google Scholar
• Cardwell DSL. (1957). The Organisation of Science in England: A Retrospect. (Heinemann, London).Google Scholar
• Chandler AD. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H. (1999). Arrested development: The experience of European hard disk drive firms in comparison with U.S. and Japanese firms. J. Evolutionary Econom. 9(3):287–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J. (1972). Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni RA, Dagnino GB, Smith KG. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1371–1385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Kogut B. (1993). National specificities and the context of change: The coevolution of organization and technology. , Kogut B, ed. Country Competitiveness: Technology and the Organization of Work. (Oxford University Press, New York), 249–262.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Galunic DC. (2000). Coevolving: At last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(1):91–101.Google Scholar
• Funk JL. (2009). The co-evolution of technology and methods of standard setting: The case of the mobile phone industry. J. Evolutionary Econom. 19(1):73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furter WF. , ed. (1982). A Century of Chemical Engineering. (Plenum Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman JH. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Stern I. (2004). Selection-based learning: The coevolution of internal and external selection in high-velocity environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):39–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Orsenigo L, Pisano GP. (1999). The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: Interactions among scientific, institutional, and organizational change. , Mowery DC, Nelson RR, eds. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. (Cambridge University Press, New York), 267–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann AW. (1873). Einleitung Amtlicher Katalog der Ausstellung des Deutschen Reiches [Official catalog of exhibit by the German empire]. Wiener Weltausstellung, Gruppe III: Chemische Industrie [Vienna World Exhibition, Group III. Chemical Industry]. (Berlin), 95–139.Google Scholar
• Hull DL. (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG. (2005). The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson J. (1989). Hierarchy and creativity in chemistry, 1871–1914. , Kathryn MO, ed. Science in Germany: The Intersection of Institutional and Intellectual Issues. Osiris Second Series, Vol. 5. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 214–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopp E. (1874). Bericht über Gruppe III, Chemische Industrie [Report on Group III, Chemical Industry]. (C. Baader Verl., Schaffhausen, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Langton J. (1984). The ecological theory of bureaucracy: The case of Josiah Wedgwood and the British pottery industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):330–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B, Woolgar S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Leblebici H, Salancik GR, Copay A, King T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):333–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leprieur F, Papon P. (1979). Synthetic dyestuffs: The relations between academic chemistry and the chemical industry in nineteenth-century France. Minerva 17(2):197–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Volberda HW. (1999). Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5):519–534.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Long CP, Carroll TN. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5):535–550.Link, Google Scholar
• Martius CA. (1918). . August Wilhelm Hofmann: Chemische erinnerungen an die berliner vergangenheit. [August Wilhelm Hofmann: Reminiscences on history of the chemical community in the Berlin]. Deutsche Chemische Gesellschaft zu Berlin, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Maruyama M. (1968). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. , Buckley WF, ed. Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist: A Sourcebook. (Aldine, Chicago), 304–316.Google Scholar
• McGrath RG, Cliffe S. (2011). When your business model is in trouble. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(January–February):96–98.Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. (1982). Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution and Classification. (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. (1997). Quasi-natural organization science. Organ. Sci. 8(4):352–380.Link, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B. (2002). Managing coevolutionary dynamics. . Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• McKelvey B, Boisot M. (2009). Redefining strategic foresight: "Fast" and "far" sight via complexity science. , Costanzo L, MacKay B, eds. Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 15–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, McHugh A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):160–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP. (2003). Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Homburg E. (2001). Comparing evolutionary dynamics across different national settings: The case of the synthetic dye industry, 1857–1914. J. Evolutionary Econom. 11 177–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institution. Indust. Corporate Change 3(1):47–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR. (1995). Co-evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institution, and the making of comparative advantage. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 2(2):171–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nye MJ. (1993). National styles? French and English chemistry in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Osiris Second Ser. 8 30–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qualls W, Olshavsky RW, Michaels RE. (1981). Shortening of the PLC: An empirical test. J. Marketing 45(4):76–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative strategies. (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. (1998). Technological change in chemicals: The role of the university-industry interface. , Arora A, Landau R, Rosenberg N, eds. Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth: Insights from the Chemical Industry. (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 193–230.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A. (1999). On the complexity of technological evolution: Exploring coevolution within and across hierarchical levels in optical disc technology. , Baum JAC, McKelvey B, eds. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 169–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Tushman ML. (1994). On the co-evolution of technology and organization. , Baum J, Singh J, eds. The Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. (Oxford University Press, New York), 403–424.Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Thursby M. (2007). The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Res. Policy 36(6):832–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schacter DL. (1996). Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past, 1st ed. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon C. (1997). Chemie in der Schweiz: Dimension eines Themas [Chemistry in Switzerland: Dimensions of a topic]. , Busset T, Rosenbusch A, Simon C, eds. Chemie in der Schweiz: Geschichte der Forschung und der Industrie [Chemistry in Switzerland: History of Chemical Research and the Industry]. (Christoph Merian Verlag, Basel, Switzerland), 25–57.Google Scholar
• Société de Chimique. (1873). Bulletin de la Société chimique de Paris. (L. Hachette, Paris).Google Scholar
• Société de Chimique. (1895). Bulletin de la Société chimique de Paris. (L. Hachette, Paris).Google Scholar
• Société de Chimique. (1914). Bulletin de la Société chimique de France. (G. Masson, Paris).Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL. (1978). Theoretical Methods in Social History. (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Teltschik W. (1992). Geschichte der Deutschen Grosschemie: Entwicklung und Einfluss in Staat und Gesellschaft [History of the Large-Scale German Chemical Industry: Development and Impact on State and Society]. (VCH, Weinheim, Germany).Google Scholar
• Thackray A, Sturchio JL, Carroll PT, Bud RF. (1985). Chemistry in America, 1876–1976. (Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Thissen F. (1922). Die Stellung der deutschen Teerfarbenindustrie in der Weltwirtschaft (vor, in, und nach dem Kriege) [The position of the German tar color industry in the global economy before, during, and after the war]. . Doctoral dissertation. University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.Google Scholar
• Tilly C. (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Toulmin SE. (1972). Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Travis AS. (1993). The Rainbow Makers: The Origins of the Synthetic Dyestuffs Industry in Western Europe. (Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem, PA).Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Belt H, Gremmen B, Homburg E, Hornix W. (1984). De Ontwikkeling van de Kleurstofindustrie [The development of the synthetic dye industry]. . Report, Faculteit der Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Van De Ven A, Grazman DN. (1999). Evolution in a nested hierarchy: A genealogy of Twin Cities health care organizations, 1853–1995. , Baum JAC, McKelvey B, eds. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 185–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weeks J, Galunic DC. (2003). A theory of the cultural evolution of the firm: The intra-organizational ecology of memes. J. Management Stud. 24(8):1309–1352.Google Scholar
• Weick KE. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Wiggins RR, Ruefli TW. (2005). Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. 26(10):887–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wurtz A. (1876). Progrés de l'industrie des matières colorantes artificielles [The Progress of the Synthetic Dye Industry]. (G. Masson, Paris).Google Scholar
• Yates JA. (1993). Co-evolution of information-processing technology and use: Interaction between the life insurance and tabulating industries. Bus. History Rev. 67(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L, Darby M, Furner J, Liu RC, Ma H. (2007). Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Res. Policy 36(6):850–863.Crossref, Google Scholar