The Microevolution of Routines: How Problem Solving and Social Preferences Interact

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0719

References

  • Argote L, Todorova G. (2007). Organizational learning. , Hodgkinson GP, Ford KJ, eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 22. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 193–234.Google Scholar
  • Bales RF. (1999). Social Interaction Systems: Theory and Measurement. (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Barkow JH. (1975). Strategies for self esteem and prestige in Maradi, Niger Republic. , Williams TR, ed. Psychological Anthropology. (Mouton, The Hague, The Netherlands), 373–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkow JH. (1989). Darwin, Sex and Status. (Toronto University Press, Toronto).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger JM, Cohen BP, Zelditch M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3):241–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger JM, Fisek H, Norman RZ, Zelditch M. (1977). Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bester H, Güth W. (1998). Is altruism evolutionarily stable? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 34(2):193–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettenhausen KL, Murnighan JK. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(3):350–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohn RE. (1995). Noise and learning in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 41(1):31–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton GE, Ockenfels A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ. (2005). The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brehmer B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica 45(1–3):223–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. (1999). Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96(19):10575–10577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caruso HM, Woolley AW. (2008). Harnessing the power of emergent interdependence to promote diverse team collaboration. , Phillips KW, ed. Diversity and Groups. (JAI Press, Stamford, CT), 245–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooksey R. (1996). Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
  • Cosmides L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31(3):187–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cosmides L, Tooby J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. , Lewis M, Havilland-Jones JM, eds. Handbook of the Emotions, 2nd ed. (Guilford, New York), 91–113.Google Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Devos T, Silver LA, Mackie DM, Smith ER. (2002). Experiencing intergroup emotions. , Mackie DM, Smith ER, eds. From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups. (Psychology Press, New York), 111–134.Google Scholar
  • de Waal F. (1989). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  • Efferson C, Lalive R, Fehr E. (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science 321(5897):1844–1849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM. (1962). Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature 425(23):785–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske AP. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: A framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. 99(4):689–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank RH. (1985). Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Frank RH. (1988). Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of Emotions. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gersick CJG, Hackman JR. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths P. (1997). What Emotions Really Are. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinsz VB. (1999). Group decision making with responses of a quantitative nature: The theory of social decision schemes for quantities. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 80(1):28–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth RM. (2001). Educating Intuition. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hollingshead AB. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Comm. Res. 23(2):193–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman BA, Loch CH, Önçüler A. (2004). Status as a valued resource. Soc. Psych. Quart. 67(1):103–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs RC, Campbell DT. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 62(3):649–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karelaia N, Hogarth R. (2008). Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psych. Bull. 134(3):404–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(1):81–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kemper TD, Collins R. (1990). Dimensions of microinteraction. Amer. J. Sociol. 96(1):32–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurzban R, Tooby J, Cosmides L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(26):15387–15392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EJ. (2005). Role of status in group processes. , Thomas-Hunt MC, ed. Research on Managing Groups and Teams Status and Groups, Vol. 7. (Elsevier, New York), 315–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EJ, Thye SR. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25 217–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch CH, Galunic DC, Schneider S. (2006). Balancing cooperation and competition in human groups: The role of emotional algorithms and evolution. Managerial Decision Econom. 27(2–3):217–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch CH, Wu Y. (2008). Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Sci. 54(11):1835–1849.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Olsen JP. (1975). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. (Universitetsförlaget, Bergen, Norway).Google Scholar
  • Massey DS. (2002). A brief history of human society: The origin and role of emotion in social life. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 67(2):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath JE. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289(5485):1773–1775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(4):497–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning NP, Sterman JD. (2002). Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C, Walker HA. (1995). Status structures. , Cook K, Fine G, House J, eds. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. (Allyn & Bacon, Boston), 281–310.Google Scholar
  • Schein EH. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Scherer KR. (2000). Emotion. , Hewstone M, Stroebe W, eds. Introduction to Social Psychology: A European Perspective. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 151–191.Google Scholar
  • Sessa VI, London M. , eds. (2008). Group Learning. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Sherif M. (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms. (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sherif M. (1966). In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Stasser G, Stewart DD, Wittenbaum GM. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(3):244–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Amer. 223(5):96–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. , Worchel S, Austin WG, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
  • Thomas-Hunt MC, Ogden TY, Neale MA. (2003). Who's really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. 49(4):464–477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thye SR. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(3):407–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trivers RL. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46(1):35–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trivers R. (1985). Social Evolution. (Benjamin/Cummins Publishing, Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veblen T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weber M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (Free Press, New York). . [Orig. pub. as Wirtschaft und Gessellschaft.] Google Scholar
  • Weber RA, Camerer CF. (2003). Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Gilfillan DP. (1971). Fate of arbitrary traditions in a laboratory microculture. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 17(2):179–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum GM, Bowman JM. (2005). Member status and information exchange in decision-making groups. , Thomas-Hunt MC, ed. Research on Managing Groups and Teams Status and Groups, Vol. 7. (Elsevier, New York), 143–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn M, Gibson C. (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(3):501–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.