Supply Portfolio Concentration in Outsourced Knowledge-Based Services

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0725

References

  • Afuah A. (2001). Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of technological change? Acad. Management J. 44(6):1211–1228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
  • Anderson E, Schmittlein D. (1984). Integration of the sales forces: An empirical examination. RAND J. Econom. 15(3):385–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. (1996). Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management J. 17(2):129–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP. (1999). Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N, Zenger T. (2012). Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ. (1974). The Limits of Organization. (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bakos JY, Brynjolfsson E. (1993). Information technology, incentives, and the optimal number of suppliers. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):37–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan S, Wernerfelt B. (1986). Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management J. 7(5):347–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barzel Y. (1982). Measurement cost and the organization of markets. J. Law Econom. 25(1):27–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social science network analysis. (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA).Google Scholar
  • Carbone J. (2006). Supply chain manager of the year: Steve Darendinger, champion of change. Purchasing (September 21):42.Google Scholar
  • Clemons EK, Reddi SP, Row MC. (1993). The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):9–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coff RW. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-base view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. 10(2):119–133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I, Cool K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JH, Singh H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P, del Sol P. (1998). Commitment versus flexibility? Calif. Management Rev. 40(4):26–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granger CWJ. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. (2004). Fixed effects and bias due to the incidental parameters problem in the Tobit model. Econometric Rev. 23(2):125–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. (2002). A note on the bias in the Herfindahl-type measures based on count data. , Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, eds. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 454–459.Google Scholar
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Harrigan KR. (1986). Matching vertical integration strategies to competitive conditions. Strategic Management J. 7(6):535–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch NW, Mowery DC. (1998). Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11):1461–1477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman JA. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. (1994). Firm-specificity in corporate applied R&D. Organ. Sci. 5(2):173–184.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G. (2005). How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management J. 26(1):75–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G. (2006). Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management J. 27(6):501–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G, Mellewigt T. (2009). Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe AB. (1998). The importance of “spillovers” in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. J. Tech. Transfer 23(2):11–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Fogarty MS, Banks BA. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):183–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones GR. (1984). Task visibility, free riding and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 9(4):684–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kang MP, Mahoney JT, Tan DC. (2009). Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: The case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management J. 30(2):117–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim SM, Mahoney JT. (2006). Mutual commitment to support exchange: Relation-specific IT system as a substitute for managerial hierarchy. Strategic Management J. 27(5):401–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B, Leffler KB. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. 89(4):615–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lajili K, Mahoney JT. (2006). Revisiting agency and transaction costs theory predictions on vertical financial ownership and contracting: Electronic integration as an organizational form choice. Managerial Decision Econom. 27(7):573–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lajili K, Madunic M, Mahoney JT. (2007). Testing organizational economics theories of vertical integration. Res. Methodol. Strategy Management 4(1):343–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ. (2003). An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. (1995). Patenting in the shadow of competitors. J. Law Econom. 38(2):463–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macneil IR. (1980). The New Social Contract. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Madsen TL, Mosakowski E, Zaheer S. (2003). Knowledge retention and personnel mobility: The non-disruptive effects of inflows of experience. Organ. Sci. 14(2):173–191.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahoney JT. (1992). The choice of organizational form—Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Management J. 13(8):559–584.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matyas L, Sevestre P. , eds. (2008). The Econometrics of Panel Data. (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer KJ. (2006). Spillovers and governance: An analysis of knowledge and reputational spillovers in information technology. Acad. Management J. 49(1):69–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer KJ, Argyres NS. (2004). Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15(4):394–410.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer KJ, Salomon RM. (2006). Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: Integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management J. 49(5):942–959.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer KJ, Somaya D, Williamson IO. (2012). Firm-specific, industry-specific, and occupational human capital and the sourcing of knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1311–1329.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J. (1995). Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2):179–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management J. 12(S2):61–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S, Stern S. (2009). Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. 55(2):311–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oddi AS. (2004). Patent attorney malpractice: An oxymoron no more. J. Law, Tech. Policy 1 1–72.Google Scholar
  • Ouchi WG. (1979). Conceptual-framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parmigiani A. (2007). Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategic Management J. 28(3):285–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parmigiani A, Mitchell W. (2009). Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: The impact of within-firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1065–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L, Zenger TR. (1998). Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L, Zenger TR. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn JB. (2000). Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management Rev. 41(4):13–28.Google Scholar
  • Rangan VK, Bell M. (1999). Dell online. . HBS Case 9-598-116, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Rothaermel FT, Hitt MA, Jobe LA. (2006). Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing: Effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1033–1056.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R, Mahoney JT. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter special issue):63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shao M, Lee H. (2009). Cisco Systems, Inc.: Collaborating on new product introduction. . Stanford Graduate School of Business Case GS-66, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N. (2002). Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. 48(7):900–916.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Somaya D. (2003). Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management J. 24(1):17–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan R, Brush TH. (2006). Supplier performance in vertical alliances: The effects of self-enforcing agreements and enforceable contracts. Organ. Sci. 17(4):436–452.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(3):223–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Telser LG. (1980). Theory of self-enforcing agreements. J. Bus. 53(1):27–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tobin J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent-variables. Econometrica 26(1):24–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Nordenflycht A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G, Weber D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):373–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H, Chen WR. (2010). Firm-specificity in technological innovation and rent appropriation: The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity. Res. Policy 39(1):141–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H, He J, Mahoney JT. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic- and relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1265–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1087–1108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN. (2004). Size matters: The standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. J. Socio-Econom. 33(5):331–344.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.