Family Firm Governance, Strategic Conformity, and Performance: Institutional vs. Strategic Perspectives

References

• Anderson RC, Reeb DM. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance 58(3):1301–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrègle J.-L., Hitt MA, Sirmon DG, Véry P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. J. Management Stud. 44(1):73–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW. (1990). The double edge of organizational legitimation. Organ. Sci. 1(2):177–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Mezias SJ. (1992). Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):580–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Oliver C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):187–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Powell WW. (1995). Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations: Comment on Hannan, Carroll, Dundon, and Torres. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 60(4):529–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Nielson K, Pérez-González F, Wolfenzon D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quart. J. Econom. 122(2):647–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía L, Larraza-Kintana M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):82–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. J. Econom. Perspect. 20(2):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K, Lennox R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement. Psych. Bull. 110(2):305–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caeldries F. (1996). The institutional embeddedness of strategy: Predation through legislation. , Shrivastava P, Huff A, Dutton J, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 13. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 215–246.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT. (1995). An introduction to organizational ecology. , Carroll GR, Hannan MT, eds. Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure and Selection. (Oxford University Press, New York), 17–31.Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Hambrick DC. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Acad. Management J. 38(2):453–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi YR, Shepherd DA. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. J. Management 31(4):573–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Kellermanns F. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks and performance in family and non-family companies. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 33(3):739–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(5):555–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claessens S, Djankov S, Fan JPH, Lang LHP. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. J. Finance 57(6):2741–2771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen B, Dean T. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management J. 26(7):683–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad. Management J. 39(4):1024–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Suchman MC. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. , Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 49–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer H. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):501–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. (2002). The twenty-first century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(4):1114–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gersick KE, Davis JA, Hampton MM, Lansberg I. (1997). Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Makri M, Larraza-Kintana M. (2010a). Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. J. Management Stud. 47(2):223–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Cruz C, Berrone P, De Castro J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):653–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes K, Nuñez-Nickel M, Jacobson K, Moyano-Fuentes J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):106–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Makri M, Hoskisson R, Sirmon D, Campbell J. (2010b). Innovation and the preservation of socioemotional wealth. . Working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Diaz AM, Li SX, Lorente JC. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci. 21(2):521–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Habbershon T, Williams M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Bus. Rev. 12(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habbershon T, Williams M, MacMillan I. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. J. Bus. Venturing 18(4):451–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, D'Aveni RA. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Sci. 38(10):1445–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizations. , Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 369–406.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Cho TS, Jackson EM. (2004). Isomorphism in reverse: Institutional theory as an explanation for recent increases in intraindustry heterogeneity and managerial discretion. , Kramer RM, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 307–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris R, Martinez JI, Ward JL. (1994). Is strategy different for the family-owned business? Family Bus. Rev. 7(2):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heugens PMAR, Lander MW. (2009). Structure! Agency! (And other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Acad. Management J. 52(1):61–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management J. 27(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James HS. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 6(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James HS. (2006). Family Capitalism: Wendels, Haniels, Falcks, and the Continental European Model. (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Dowd TJ, Ridgeway CL. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32(1):53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein SB, Astrachan JH, Smyrnios KX. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construct validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 29(3):321–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landes D. (2006). Dynasties: Fortunes and Misfortunes of the World's Great Family Businesses. (Viking, New York).Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller I, Miller D. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 33(6):1169–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller I, Miller D, Lester RH. (2011). Stewardship or agency: A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organ. Sci. 22(3):704–721.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang K, Zeger SL. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehrotra V, Morck RK, Shim J, Wiwattanakang Y. (2010). Adoptive expectations: Rising son tournaments in Japanese family firms. . Working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Sci. 29(7):770–791.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Bromiley P. (1990). Strategic risk and corporate performance: An analysis of alternative risk measures. Acad. Management J. 33(4):756–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Chen M.-J. (1996). Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Soc. Forces 74(4):1209–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I. (2005). Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Miller D, Shamsie J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad. Management J. 39(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester RH. (2010). Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly-traded companies. Strategic Management J. 31(2):201–223.Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester R. (2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behavior: Social context, identity and institutional logics. J. Management Stud. 48(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholnick B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. J. Management Stud. 45(1):50–78.Google Scholar
• Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester RH, Cannella AA. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? J. Corporate Finance 13(5):829–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Lee J, Chang S, Le Breton-Miller I. (2009). Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family versus non-family technology firms in emerging markets. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(5):802–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morck RK, Yeung B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 27(4):367–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morck RK, Wolfenzon D, Yeung B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. J. Econom. Literature 43(3):655–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murtha TP, Spencer JW, Lenway SA. (1996). Moving targets: national industrial strategies and embedded innovation in the global flat panel display industry. , Shrivastava P, Huff A, Dutton J, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 13. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 245–279.Google Scholar
• Peterson MA. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Prentice-Hall, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME. (1980). Competitive Analysis: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Scott WR. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):877–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. J. Bus. Venturing 18(4):473–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN, Buchholtz A. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(2):99–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Scott WR. (2007). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sirmon D, Arrègle J.-L., Hitt MA, Very P. (2008). The role of family influence in firms' strategic response to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 32(6):979–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Soule S. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24 265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Greenwood R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W. (2008). Institutional logics. , Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 99–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villalonga B, Amit R. (2006). How do family ownership, management, and control affect firm value? J. Financial Econom. 80(2):385–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volpin PF. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. J. Financial Econom. 64(1):61–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward JL. (2004). Perpetuating the Family Business: 50 Lessons Learned from Long-Lasting, Successful Families in Business. (Family Enterprise Publishers, Marietta, GA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfeldt B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ. (1998). The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):127–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Gulati R, Shortell SM. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):366–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD. (2004). The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):433–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang K, Albert PS. (1988). Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44(4):1049–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellweger T. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital and generic investment strategies of family firms. Family Bus. Rev. 20(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar