Dealing with Complexity: Integrated vs. Chunky Search Processes

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB. (2000). Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B. (2004). Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA. (2004). From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA. (2004). Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Frensch PA, Funke J. (1995). Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW. (2005). Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. (1999). ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, MacCormack A. (1996). Team New Zealand (C). . HBS Case 697-041, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA. (1993). Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA, Lobo J, Macready WG. (2000). Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(2):141–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA. (2007). Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY. (2006). Interdependency, competition, and the distribution of firm and industry profits. Management Sci. 52(5):757–772.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounamaa PH, March JG. (1987). Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY. (2006). Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA. (1958). Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch CH, Huchzermeier A. (2003). Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. 49(6):733–750.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch CH, Wilkinson D, Huberman BA. (2010). Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Management Sci. 56(5):831–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller GA. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Frenken K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35(7):925–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA. (1972). Human Problem Solving. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N. (2003). Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N. (2007). Patterned interaction in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. 63(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Podolny JM. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(7):21–38.Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback JM. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. 16(6):415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH. (1999). Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development. J. Product Innovation Management 16(2):160–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S, von Hippel E, Franke R. (1998). Modes of experimentation: An innovation process—and competitive—variable. Res. Policy 27(3):315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD. (1967). Organizations in Action. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD. (2007). Product Design and Development. (McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Cattani G, Dorsch A. (2007). The value of moderate obsession: Insight from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18(3):403–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Wright S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proc. 6th Internat. Congress Genetics , Ithaca, NY, 355–366.Google Scholar