Status Conflict in Groups

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0734

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Amason A. (1996) Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Acad. Management J. 39(1) 123–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C., Berdahl J. L. (2002) The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(6) 1362–1377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C., Kilduff G. J. (2009) Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(2) 491–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C., John O. P., Keltner D., Kring A. M. (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1) 116–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bales R. (1958) Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. , Maccoby E., Newcomb T., Hartley E., eds. Social Psychology, 3rd ed. (Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York) , 437–447.Google Scholar
  • Baumgartner T., Buckley W., Burns T. (1975) Relational control: The human structure of cooperation and conflict. J. Conflict Resolution 19(3) 417–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3) 720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin B. A., Poldony J. M. (1999) Status, quality and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3) 563–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Cohen B. P., Zelditch M. (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3) 241–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6 479–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Fisek M. H., Norman R. Z. (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 379–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Webster M., Ridgeway C. L., Rosenholtz S. J. (1986) Status cues, expectations, and behavior. , Lawler E. J., ed. Advances in Group Process. (JAI Press, New York) , 1–22.Google Scholar
  • Black D. (1990) The elementary forms of conflict management. , Lerner M. J., ed. New Directions in the Study of Justice, Law, and Social Control. (Plenum, New York) , 43–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Bliese P. (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , Klein K., Kozlowski S., eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) , 349–381.Google Scholar
  • Brett J. M., Olekalns M., Friedman R., Goates N., Anderson C., Lisco C. C. (2007) Sticks and stones: Language, face, and online dispute resolution. Acad. Management J. 50(1) 85–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale P. J., Probst T. M. (1998) Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(5) 1300–1309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnevale P. J., Pruitt D. G., Britton S. D. (1979) Looking tough: The negotiator under constituent surveillance. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 5(1) 118–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Carnevale P. J. (2003) Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. , Berkowitz L., Zanna M. P., eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. (Academic Press, San Diego) , 235–291.Google Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. (2003a) A contingency theory of task conflict and performance in groups and organizational teams. , West M., Tjosvold D., Smith K., eds. International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) , 151–165.Google Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. (2003b) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4) 741–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., West M. (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6) 1191–1201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Harinck F., Van Vianen A. E. M. (1999) Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. , Cooper C. I., Robertson I., eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) , 369–414.Google Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Nijstad B. A., van Knippenberg D. (2008) Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 12(1) 22–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Beersma B., Stroebe K., Euwema M. C. (2006) Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(6) 927–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J. (2003) How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. 46(5) 539–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foschi M. (2000) Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26 21–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fragale A. R. (2006) The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2) 243–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedkin N. E. (1999) Choice shift and group polarization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(6) 856–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. V. (1999) Collective violence and group solidarity: Evidence from a feuding society. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(3) 356–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. V. (2003) Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity About Social Rank Breeds Conflict. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greer L. L., Jehn K. A. (2007) The pivotal role of emotion in intragroup process conflict. , Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Anderson C. P., eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 10. (Elsevier, New York) , 23–45.Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Polzer J. T., Elfenbein H. A. (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3) 722–737.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Morris C. G. (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. , Berkowitz L., ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. (Academic Press, San Diego) , 45–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallett T. (2003) Symbolic power and organizational culture. Sociol. Theory 21(2) 128–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Cannella A. A. (1993) Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Acad. Management J. 36(4) 733–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy C. L., Van Vugt M. (2006) Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(10) 1402–1413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P. J., Mortensen M. (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3) 290–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Sego D. J., Hedlund J., Major D. A., Phillips J. (1995) Multilevel theory of team decision-making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. J. Appl. Psych. 80(2) 292–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C. (1950) The Human Group. (Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Homans G. C. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Huberman B. A., Loch C. H., Onculer A. (2004) Status as a valued resource. Soc. Psych. Quart. 67(1) 103–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 67(2) 219–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1) 85–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janis I. (1982) Victims of Groupthink. (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Jehn K. A. (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2) 256–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A. (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3) 530–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Bendersky C. (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. , Kramer R., Staw B., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25. (Elsevier, Amsterdam) , 189–244.Google Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44(2) 238–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4) 741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge T. A., Bono J. E., Ilies R., Gerhardt M. W. (2002) Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4) 765–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalkhoff W. (2005) Collective validation in multi-actor task groups: The effects of status differentiation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 68(1) 57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kapferer B. (1969) Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. , Mitchell J. C., ed. Social Networks in Urban Situations. (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK) , 181–244.Google Scholar
  • Klein K., Bliese P., Kozlowski S., Dansereau F., Gavin M., Griffin M., Hoffman D. A., James L., Yammarino F. J., Bligh M. C. (2000) Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. , Klein K., Kozlowski S., eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) , 512–553.Google Scholar
  • Lester S. W., Meglino B. M., Korsgaard M. A. (2002) The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Acad. Management J. 45(2) 352–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R., Saunders D., Minton J. (1999) Negotiation, 3rd ed. (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston) .Google Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Huberman B. A., Stout S. (2000) Status competition and performance in work groups. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(1) 35–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lord R. G. (1985) An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. , Cummings L. L., Staw B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 87–128.Google Scholar
  • Lord R. G., Devader C. L., Alliger G. M. (1986) A metaanalysis of the relation between personality-traits and leadership perceptions—An application of validity generalization procedures. J. Appl. Psych. 71(3) 402–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovelace K., Shapiro D. L., Weingart L. R. (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(4) 779–793.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maclay G., Knipe H. (1972) The Dominant Man: The Pecking Order in Human Society. (Delacorte Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1) 351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mannix E., Neale M. (1993) Power imbalance and the pattern of exchange in dyadic negotiation. Group Decision Negotiation 2(2) 119–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mannix E. A., Sauer S. (2006) Status and power in organizational group research: Acknowledging the pervasiveness of hierarchy. , Thye S. R., Lawler E. J., eds. Social Psychology of the Workplace Advances in Group Processes. (Elsevier Science/JAI Press, New York) , 149–182.Google Scholar
  • Miles M., Huberman A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Morrill C. (1991) Conflict management, honor and organizational change. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(3) 585–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrill C. (1995) The Executive Way: Conflict Management in Corporations. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Wasserman W. (1996) Applied Linear Regression Models, 3rd ed. (Irwin, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Overbeck J. R., Correll J., Park B. (2005) Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. , Thomas-Hunt M. C., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. (Elsevier, Oxford, UK) , 169–199.Google Scholar
  • Owens D. A., Sutton R. I. (2001) Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. , Turner M. E., ed. Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) , 299–316.Google Scholar
  • Perlow L. A. (2003) When You Say Yes But Mean No: How Silencing Conflict Wrecks Relationships and Companies…and What You Can Do About it. (Crown Business, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Fong C. T. (2004) The business school “business”: Some lessons from the US experience. J. Management Stud. 41(8) 1501–1520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Phillips D. J. (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2) 453–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer J., Caruso H. (2008) Identity negotiation processes amidst diversity. , Brief A. P., ed. Diversity at Work. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) , 89–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer J., Mannix E., Neale M. (1998) Interest alignment and coalitions in multi-party negotiation. Acad. Management J. 41(4) 42–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pondy L. R. (1967) Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(2) 296–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porath C. L., Overbeck J. R., Pearson C. M. (2008) Picking up the gauntlet: How individuals respond to status challenges. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 38(7) 1945–1980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pruitt D. (1983) Achieving integrative agreements. , Bazerman M., Lewicki R., eds. Negotiating in Organizations. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) , 35–50.Google Scholar
  • Pruitt D., Rubin J. (1986) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement. (Random House, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Correll S. J. (2006) Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Soc. Forces 85(1) 431–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Erickson K. G. (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3) 579–615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Walker H. A. (1995) Status structures. , Cook K., Fine G., House J., eds. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. (Allyn & Bacon, Newton, MA) , 281–310.Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Boyle E. H., Kuipers K. J., Robinson D. T. (1998) How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 331–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy D. F. (1959) Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4) 158–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin J. Z., Brown B. R. (1975) The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. (Academic Press, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Schein V. F. (1977) Individual power and political behavior in organization: An inadequately explored reality. Acad. Management Rev. 2(1) 64–71.Google Scholar
  • Schmidt S. M., Kochan T. A. (1972) Conflict: Towards conceptual clarity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(3) 359–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwenk C. (1990) Conflict in organizational decision making: An exploratory study. Management Sci. 36(4) 436–449.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sell J., Lovaglia M. J., Mannix E. A., Samuelson C. D., Wilson R. K. (2004) Investigating conflict, power, and status within and among groups. Small Group Res. 35(1) 44–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah P., Jehn K. A. (1993) Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict and task. Group Decision Negotiation 2(2) 149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simons T. L., Peterson R. S. (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. 85(1) 102–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava A., Bartol K. M., Locke E. A. (2006) Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(6) 1239–1251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart D. (2005) Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(5) 823–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A., Schatzman L., Ehrlich D., Bucher R., Sabshin M. (1963) The hospital and its negotiated order. , Freidson E., ed. The Hospital in Modern Society. (Free Press, New York) , 147–169.Google Scholar
  • Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4) 685–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson L. (1991) Information exchange in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 27(2) 161–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson L. (2001) The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.) Google Scholar
  • Thompson L. L., Mannix E. A., Bazerman M. H. (1988) Group negotiation: Effects of decision rule, agenda, and aspiration. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(1) 86–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiedens L. Z., Fragale A. R. (2003) Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(3) 558–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiedens L. Z., Unzueta M. M., Young M. J. (2007) An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(3) 402–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tinsley C. H., O'Connor K. M., Sullivan B. A. (2002) Tough guys finish last: The perils of a distributive reputation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(2) 621–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toma C., Butera F. (2009) Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35(6) 793–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Beest I., Van Dijk E. (2007) Self-interest and fairness in coalition formation: A social utility approach to understanding partner selection and payoff allocations in groups. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 18(1) 132–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Beest I., Van Dijk E., Wilke H. (2004) Resources and alternatives in coalition formation: The effects on payoff, self-serving behaviour, and bargaining length. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 34(6) 713–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Vegt G. S., de Jong S. B., Bunderson J. S., Molleman E. (2010) Power asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organ. Sci. 21(2) 347–361.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Kleef G. A., De Dreu C. K. W., Pietroni D., Manstead A. S. R. (2006) Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4) 557–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Vugt M. (2006) Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(4) 354–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R., Hackman J. R., Lehman E. (2005) Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 41(4) 1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wald A. (1943) Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 54(3) 426–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton R. E., McKersie R. B. (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. (McGraw-Hill, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Whyte W. F. (1943) Street Corner Society. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
  • Willer R. (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1) 23–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X. G. (2005) The institutional logic of occupational prestige ranking: Reconceptualization and reanalyses. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1) 90–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.