Task Bubbles, Artifacts, Shared Emotion, and Mutual Focus of Attention: A Comparative Study of the Microprocesses of Group Engagement

References

• Bales RF. (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bales RF, Strodtbeck FL. (1951) Phases in group problem-solving. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 46 (4):485–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Barley SR. (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31 (1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG. (2002) The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47 (4):644–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA. (2003a) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14 (3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA. (2003b) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109 (3): 720–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli LL. (1994) Designing Engineers (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chen G, Kanfer R, DeShon RP, Mathieu JE, Kozlowski SWJ. (2009) The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer's (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 110 (1):45–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins R. (1990) Stratification, emotional energy, and the transient emotions. , Kemper TD, ed. Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions (SUNY Press, Albany, NY), 27–57.Google Scholar
• Collins R. (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M. (1973) The Resolution of Conflicts (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Drazin R, Glynn MA, Kazanjian RK. (1999) Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24 (2):286–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durkheim E. ([1912] 1965) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gersick C. (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31 (1):9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C. (1989) Making time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32 (2):274–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Glass RL. (1995) Software Creativity (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Goffman E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Goffman E. (1969) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Allen Lane, London).Google Scholar
• Hackman JR. (1987) The design of work teams. , Lorsch JW, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR. (1976) Motivation through the design of work. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 16 (2):250–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J. (2000) The positive emotion of elevation. Prevention Treatment 3: . Article 3.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA. (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17 (4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson K. (1999) On Line and on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hertel G, Kerr NL, Messe LA. (2000) Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79 (4):580–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G, Deter C, Konradt U. (2003) Motivation gains in computer-supported groups. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33 (10):2080–2105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33 (4): 692–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. (1992) To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations 45 (4):321–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köhler O. (1926) Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenarbeit [Physical performance in individual and group situations]. Industrielle Psychotechnik 3 :274–282.Google Scholar
• Köhler O. (1927) Über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperarbeit und die Bedingung optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion [On group efficiency of physical labor and the conditions of optimal collective performance]. Industrielle Psychotechnik 4 :209–226.Google Scholar
• Kunda G. (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, von Hippel E. (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32 (6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B, Woolgar S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Piccolo RF, Jackson CL, Mathieu JE, Saul JR. (2008) A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psych. 61 (2):273–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang D, Moreland R, Argote L. (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21 (4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks SR. (1977) Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42 (6): 921–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26 (3):355–376.Google Scholar
• Metiu A. (2006) Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organ. Sci. 17 (4):418–435.Link, Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Conlon DE. (1991) The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36 (2):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA. (2001) Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem solving groups. Acad. Management J. 44 (4):794–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Eisenhardt KM. (2002) Integrating knowledge in groups: How simple formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. 13 (4):370–386.Link, Google Scholar
• O'Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley AW. (2011) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of productivity and learning effects for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36 (3): 461–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S, Bechky BA. (2006) Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Acad. Management J. 49 (5):918–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow LA. (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44 (1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER. (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Management J. 53 (3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringelmann M. (1913) Recherches sur les moteurs animes: Travail de l'homme [Research on animate sources of power: The work of man]. Annales de I'lnstitut National Agronomique 12 (1):1–40.Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP. (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46 (4): 655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Patil S. (2012) Being there: Work engagement and positive organizational scholarship. , Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 56–69.Google Scholar
• Saavedra R, Earley PC, Van Dyne L. (1993) Complex interdependence in task performing groups. J. Appl. Psych. 78 (1):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schaufeli W, Bakker A. (2003) Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. . Working paper, Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 25 (5):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamir B. (1990) Calculations, values, and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations 43 (4):313–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Harvey OJ, White BJ, Hood WR, Sherif CW. (1961) Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers' Cave Experiment (Oklahoma Book Exchange, Norman, OK).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Suchman LA. (1988) Representing practice in cognitive science. Human Stud. 11((2–3) :305–325.Google Scholar
• Thayer RE. (1989) The Biopsychology of Mood and Arousal (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Totterdell P. (1999) Mood scores: Mood and performance in professional cricketers. British J. Psych. 90 (3):317–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Totterdell P. (2000) Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sports teams. J. Appl. Psych. 85 (6):848–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ullman E. (1997) Close to the Machine: Technophilia and Its Discontents (City Lights Books, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Wageman R. (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40 (1):145–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Giuliano T, Hertel P. (1985) Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. , Ickes WJ, ed. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (Springer-Verlag, New York), 253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38 (3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingart LR. (1997) How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. , Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 19 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 189–239.Google Scholar
• Weingart LR. (2012) Studying dynamics within groups. , Neale MA, Mannix EA, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 15 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–25.Google Scholar