Bringing the Institutional Context Back In: A Cross-National Comparison of Alliance Partner Selection and Knowledge Acquisition

References

• Adler P, Kwon S. (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27 (1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45 (3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C. (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22((6/7) :521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC. (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80((1) :123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittelman M. (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88 (4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B. (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45 (7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Song J, Grant R. (2002) Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organ. Sci. 13 (2):147–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Amable B. (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism Oxford (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M. (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35 (4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avadikyan A, Cohendet P, Héraud J. (2003) The Economic Dynamics of Fuel Cell Technologies (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartholomew S. (1997) National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in global system. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 28 (2):241–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Oliver C. (1991) Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36 (2):187–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B. (2000) Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21 (3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday Anchor, New York).Google Scholar
• Busenitz L, Gómez C, Spencer J. (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad. Management J. 43 (5):994–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Guillén M. (2009) National corporate governance institutions and post-acquisition target reorganization. Strategic Management J. 30 (8):803–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casper S, Whitley R. (2004) Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: A comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden, and the UK. Res. Policy 33 (1):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawson A. (1985) Organized Interests and the State (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R. (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46 (2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on knowledge spillovers and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35 (1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossland C, Hambrick D. (2007) How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management J. 28 (8):767–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crouch C, Streeck W. (1997) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March J. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dacin MT. (1997) Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Acad. Management J. 40 (1):46–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Oliver C, Roy JP. (2007) The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management J. 28 (2):169–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL. (1996) Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad. Management J. 39 (4):1024–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48 (2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, von Hippel E. (2008) Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organ. Sci. 19 (2):187–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. (1985) The spread of multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 50 (3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-first Century Capitalist Societies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1 (3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Karnøe P. (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 32 (2):277–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golub G, Van Loan C. (1996) Matrix Computations, 3rd ed. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe AB. (2005) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. 80 (1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H, Baum J, Mitsuhashi H, Rowley T. (2010) Built to last but falling apart: Cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Acad. Management J. 53 (2):302–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffiths A, Zammuto RF, Klimoski RJ. (2005) Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: An integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. 30 (4):823–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104 (5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A. (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. 21 (3):203–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Guillén M, Macpherson J. (2002) Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47 (2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J, Narula R. (1996) Choosing organizational modes of strategic technology partnering: International and sectoral differences. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 27 (2):265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall PA, Soskice D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton B, Nickerson J. (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1 (1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall B, Griliches Z. (1984) Econometric models from count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica 52 (4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. (1993) Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38 (4):593–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I. (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15 (s1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart J, Larimo J. (1998) The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 29 (3):515–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks A, Kenworthy L. (1998) Cooperation and political economic performance in affluent democratic capitalism. Amer. J. Sociol. 103 (6):1631–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA. (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24 (4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Ahlstrom D, Dacin T, Levitas E, Svobodina L. (2004) The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organ. Sci. 15 (2):173–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Dacin MT, Levitas E, Arregle JL, Borza A. (2000) Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad. Management J. 43 (3):449–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28 (4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang K, Murray F. (2009) Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. Acad. Management J. 52 (6):1193–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Kilduff M, Tsai W. (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16 (4):359–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market values. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76 (5):984–1002.Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108 (3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jankowski R. (1989) Preference aggregation in firms and corporatist organizations: The enterprise group as a cellular encompassing organization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 33 (4):973–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S, Anderson E. (2003) Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. 49 (12):1684–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• Jap S, Anderson E. (2007) Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Management Sci. 53 (2):260–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Jepperson R. (2002) Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Soc. Theory 20 (1):61–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger J, Eisenhardt K. (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms, and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53 (2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katzenstein PJ. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Kenworthy L. (2003) Quantitative indicators of corporatism. Internat. J. Sociol. 33 (3):10–44.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N. (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19 (3):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. (1989) The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J. Indust. Econom. 38 (2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3 (3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Zaheer S. (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 24 (1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin M. (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Acad. Management Rev. 33 (4):994–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwok CY, Tadesse S. (2006) The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37 (6):767–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March JG. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14 (Winter special issue):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher J, Mowery D, Di Minin A. (2007) The “non-globalization” of innovation in the semiconductor industry. Calif. Management Rev. 50 (1):217–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. (1973) The Normative Structure of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83 (2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitsuhashi H, Greve H. (2009) A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Management J. 52 (5):975–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M, Stearn L, Marquis C. (2006) The conditional nature of embeddedness: A study of borrowing by large U.S. firms, 1973–1994. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71 (2):310–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molina O, Rhodes M. (2002) Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 5 (1):305–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS. (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17 (Winter special issue):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, O'Mahony S. (2007) Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organ. Sci. 18 (2):1006–1021.Link, Google Scholar
• Murtha TP, Lenway SA. (1994) Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations' strategies. Strategic Management J. 15 (S2):113–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science Board (2004) Science and engineering indicators. . Report NSB 04-01, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR. (1994) Evolutionary theorizing about economic change. , Smelser NJ, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 108–136.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Rosenberg N. (1993) Technical innovation and national systems. , Nelson RR, ed. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 3–22.Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Gulati R. (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. 39 (5):1245–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16 (1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. 18 (9):697–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orru M, Biggart NW, Hamilton GG. (1991). Organizational isomorphism in east Asia. , Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 361–389.Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Griliches Z. (1984) Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. , Griliches Z, ed. R&D, Patents and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 55–72.Google Scholar
• Park WG. (2008) International patent protection: 1960–2005. Res. Policy 37 (4):761–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Ungson GR. (1997) The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 40 (2):279–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J, Shaver JM. (2005) Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 26 (2):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Piore MJ, Sabel CF. (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Page KL. (1998) Network forms of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24 (1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock T, Gulati R. (2007) Standing out from the crowd: The visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organ. 5 (4):339–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41 (1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W, White D, Koput K, Owen-Smith J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110 (4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Procassini AA. (1995) Competitors in Alliance: Industry Associations, Global Rivalries and Business-Government Relations (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Rai AK. (1999) Regulating scientific research: Intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 94 (1):77–152.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P. (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49 (6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F, Boeker W. (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29 (1):47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Royo S. (2002) A New Century of Corporatism? Corporatism in Southern Europe–Spain and Portugal in Comparative Perspective (Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Sampson RC. (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50 (2):364–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps C. (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53 (7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmitter P. (1974) Still the century of corporatism? Rev. Politics. 36 (1):85–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitter P. (1981) Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary western Europe and North America. , Berger S, ed. Organizing Interests in Western Europe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 285–327.Google Scholar
• Schofer V, Fourcade-Gourinchas M. (2001) The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66 (6):806–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR. (1995) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Shonfield A. (1965) Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart T. (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53 (2):266–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Murtha TP, Lenway SA. (2005) How governments matter to new industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 30 (2):321–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE. (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21 (8):825–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman M. (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20 (3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42 (1): 35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64 (4):481–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vernon R. (1979) The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 41 (4):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley R. (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Whitley R. (2000) The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: Business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies. Organ. Stud. 21 (5): 855–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington K, Owen-Smith J, Powell W. (2009) Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54 (1):90–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windolf P. (2002) Corporate Networks in Europe and the United States (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S, George G. (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27 (2): 185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelner BA. (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30 (12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar