Hedging Your Bets: Explaining Executives' Market Labeling Strategies in Nanotechnology

References

• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM. (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry construction. Acad. Management Rev. 19 (4): 645–670.Google Scholar
• Alvesson M. (1990) Organization: From substance to image? Organ. Stud. 113 (3):373–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M. (2010) Markets, morals, and practices of trade: Jurisdictional disputes in the U.S. commerce in cadavers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55 (4):606–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW. (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organ. Sci. 1 (2):177–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH. (1997) The ubiquity and potency of labeling in organizations. Organ. Sci. 8 (1):43–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR. (1983) Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28 (3):393–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA. (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14 (3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker HS. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Berube DM. (2006) Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY).Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier MK, Nagel S. (2004) Hedge funds and the technology bubble. J. Finance 59 (5):2013–2040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13 (4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. (1983) The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. , Emerson R, ed. Contemporary Field Research (Little Brown, Boston), 109–126.Google Scholar
• Chen K, O'Mahony S. (2009) Differentiating organizational boundaries. , King BG, Fellin T, Whetten DA, eds. Research in Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 26 (JAI Press, Bingley, UK), 183–220.Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM. (1991) Keeping an eye on the mirror. Acad. Management J. 34 (3):517–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EM. (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Comm. Monogr. 51 (September):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. (1989a) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14 (4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. (1989b) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32 (3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD. (1994) Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39 (1):57–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD. (2006) Organizational Perception Management (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Bhattacharya CB. (2001) Defining who you are by who you are not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organ. Sci. 12 (4):393–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Etzion D, Ferraro F. (2010) The role of analogy in institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organ. Sci. 20 (5):1092–1107.Link, Google Scholar
• Evans J, Barley SR, Kunda G. (2004) Beach time, bridge time, and billable hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49 (1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ. (2004) The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49 (4):501–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ. (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49 (6):1173–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. (1996) Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61 (4):656–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garfinkel H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Polity Press, London).Google Scholar
• Garud R, Gehman J, Karnøe P. (2010) Categorization by association: Nuclear technology and emission-free electricity. , Sine W, David R, eds. Institutions and Entrepreneurship: Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 21 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 51–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginzel LE, Kramer RM, Sutton RI. (1993) Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. , Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 227–266.Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine de Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Abzug R. (2002) Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Acad. Management J. 45 (1):267–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Marquis C. (2004) When good names go bad: Symbolic illegitimacy in organizations. , Johnson C, ed. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 22 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 147–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Laurila J. (2011) Rage against self-replicating machines: Framing science and fiction in the US nanotechnology field. Organ. Stud. 32 (2):253–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Thoma G. (2013) Cross-pollination in science and technology: Concept mobility in the nanobiotechnology field. Ann. d'Economie Statistique. . Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR. (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y. (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46 (3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ. (1999) Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Management J. 42 (4):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G. (2006) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15 (3):467–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT. (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16 (5):474–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Hudson BA, Okhuysen GA. (2009) Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men's bathhouses. Organ. Sci. 20 (1):134–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Isenberg AC. (2001) The California gold rush, the West, and the nation. Rev. Amer. Hist. 29 (1):62–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackall R. (1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jones C, Maoret M, Massa FG, Svejenova S. (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1870–1975. Organ. Sci. 23 (6):1523–1545.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M. (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37 (5): 790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT. (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73 (April):270–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz M, Block E. (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. , Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin-Andersson K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 243–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Molnár V. (2002) The study of boundaries across the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28 (3):167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AS. (1991) Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organ. Sci. 2 (4):342–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee PM. (2001) What's in a name.com? The effects of “.com” name changes on stock prices and trading activity. Strategic Management J. 21 (8):793–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lofland J, Lofland LH. (1995) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA. (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22((6/7) :545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch PM. (2003) Social movements, field frames, and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Econom. Rev. 1 (1):71–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendrick DG, Jaffee J, Carroll GR, Khessina OM. (2003) In the bud? Disk array producers as a possibly emergent organizational form. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48 (1):60–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan M, Frost PJ, Pondy LR. (1983) Organizational symbolism. , Pondy LR, Fronst PJ, Morgan G, Dandridge TC, eds. Organizational Symbolism (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 3–35.Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Council (2000) National nanotechnology initiative: The initiative and its implementation plan. . Report, National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA. (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55 (3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16 (1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S, Bechky BA. (2006) Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Acad. Management J. 49 (5):918–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S, Bechky BA. (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53 (3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK. (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98 (6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS. (1931) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Petrilli S, Ponzio A. (2005) Semiotics Unbounded: Interpretive Routes Through the Open Network of Signs (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. (1978) The External Control of Organizations (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Kim Y. (2009) Why pseudonyms? Deception as identity preservation among jazz record companies, 1920–1929. Organ. Sci. 20 (3):481–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C. (2004) Discourse and institutions. Acad. Management Rev. 29 (4):635–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pólos L, Hannan MT, Carroll GR. (2002) Foundations of a theory of social forms. Indust. Corporate Change 11 (1):85–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JR, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A. (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40 (2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H. (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15 (S1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JR. (2002) Categorization bases and their influence on consumer/producer knowledge structures. Psych. Marketing 19 (6):503–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS. (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63 (Special issue):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K. (2009) Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54 (2):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos F, Eisenhardt K. (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: A model of entrepreneurial action in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52 (4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman D. (2007) From Hire to Liar: The Role of Deception in the Workplace (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Smircich L, Stubbart C. (1985) Strategic management in an enacted world. Acad. Management Rev. 10 (4):724–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Griesemer JR. (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19 (3):387–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Lanzolla G. (2008) Considerations for a stronger first mover advantage theory. Acad. Management Rev. 33 (1): 269–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson PC. (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31 (3): 439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS. (1987) Thought and Language (Plenum Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze K, DeSoucey M. (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes for the market for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53 (3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ. (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43 (1):127–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley JL. (2007) Understanding organizational community creation: The nanotechnology community. . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, Irvine.Google Scholar
• Woolley JL, Rottner R. (2008) Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 32 (5):791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R. (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD. (1995) Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation: Substance and symbolism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40 (2):283–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ. (1998) The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43 (3):602–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zerubaval E. (1997) Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN. (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52 (1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Furner J, Liu RC, Ma HY. (2007) Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Res. Policy 36 (6):850–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW. (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104 (4): 1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW. (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45 (3): 591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, von Rittmann J. (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108 (5):1018–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar